User talk:Th302

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Th302, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PDCook (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Re-evaluation counselling

RC has been a controversial movement and it's right that the controversies should be reported here. The article also gives a fair view of RC theory and practice. We don't take sides and it is not the job of an encyclopaedia to decide whether criticisms are fair or not; if they're notable, we report them. RC has a long history, and the fact that some of these controversies are 30 years old is not a reason to omit them. RC's website is given as a source for many of the statements in the article, and anyone going to it can read the official RC position. Hope that helps. Pelarmian (talk) 10:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Th302. I received your email about this article and the Harvey Jackins article. It's best to discuss the content of articles on their talk page. If you feel the articles are inadequate, you should feel free to edit them. Wikipedia prefers secondary source citations, although both those articles at present have a lot of primary source citations from RC publications. If those were removed there wouldn't be much to write about as there are few mentions in secondary sources - and most of them appear to be critical or even hostile. Pelarmian (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ExxonMobil may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)