User talk:TheBuilder456

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TheBuilder456, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 19:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Progress Wrestling has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Progress Wrestling was changed by TheBuilder456 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967468 on 2017-04-20T16:56:58+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Progress World Cup for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progress World Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progress World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 18:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Super Strong Style 16 Tournament for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super Strong Style 16 Tournament is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Strong Style 16 Tournament until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 18:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natural Progression Series Tournament for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natural Progression Series Tournament is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Progression Series Tournament until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 18:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NGW Undisputed Championship for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NGW Undisputed Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGW Undisputed Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 19:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NGW Tag Team Championship for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NGW Tag Team Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGW Tag Team Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 19:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NGW GenX Championship for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NGW GenX Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGW GenX Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 19:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New Generation Wrestling. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bea Priestley[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bea Priestley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Domdeparis (talk) 09:08, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Progress World Cup while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 12:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheBuilder456, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 213.252.244.38 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 12:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles and recent edits at AfD discussions[edit]

No one has a problem with you, and you are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia. We are merely discussing whether or not the articles you recently created fit the guidelines of inclusion on Wikipedia. If you want to save your articles please prove they are notable by providing evidence of significant independent coverage (please see WP:GNG). Please note that having a partnership with WWE does not prove notability because notability is not inherited. If you want to make more articles in the future, a better way to go about it is to write the articles up in your sandbox first. This is an area that you can create, edit, and expand an article until it is ready to be moved into Wikipedia mainspace. Read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you have questions about notability or sourcing, you can always ask. Nikki♥311 18:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to you on my talk page. Nikki♥311 20:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WCPWTagbelt.jpg[edit]

The file File:WCPWTagbelt.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The "article" this is intended for use in is a draft with almost no chance of becoming an article (and which has been deleted multiple times before) so there seems to be little chance that this will ever find a use in the article space. Also, the draft article is not even about the belt so the image can not serve to illustrate the subject. As it is non-free this seems to preclude any valid use. Also, the file is labelled as low resolution, which is pushing it a bit.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 17:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WCPWWomen's.jpg[edit]

The file File:WCPWWomen's.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The "article" this is intended for use in is a draft with almost no chance of becoming an article (and which has been deleted multiple times before) so there seems to be little chance that this will ever find a use in the article space. Also, the draft article is not even about the belt so the image can not serve to illustrate the subject. As it is non-free this seems to preclude any valid use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WCPW InterTitle.jpg[edit]

The file File:WCPW InterTitle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The "article" this is intended for use in is a draft with almost no chance of becoming an article (and which has been deleted multiple times before) so there seems to be little chance that this will ever find a use in the article space. Also, the draft article is not even about the belt so the image can not serve to illustrate the subject. As it is non-free this seems to preclude any valid use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Wcpwwc.jpg[edit]

The file File:Wcpwwc.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The "article" this is intended for use in is a draft with almost no chance of becoming an article (and which has been deleted multiple times before) so there seems to be little chance that this will ever find a use in the article space. Also, the draft article is not even about the belt so the image can not serve to illustrate the subject. As it is non-free this seems to preclude any valid use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:HendryWCPWWorld.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HendryWCPWWorld.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WCPWTagbelt.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WCPWTagbelt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WCPW InterTitle.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WCPW InterTitle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wcpwwc.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wcpwwc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WCPWWomen's.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WCPWWomen's.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheBuilder456 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18270 was submitted on May 12, 2017 22:54:06. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, User:Martimc123 claimed in the unblock IRC channel that this was actually their sockpuppet. So maybe we have gotten two different masters mixed up at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwdpuma. Huon (talk) 21:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]