User talk:TheCheeseManCan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, TheCheeseManCan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tali-Ihantala[edit]

Hi! And welcome. You reverted the Battle of Tali-Ihantala. I've had a discussion with SuperDeng about the reasons I'm doing these modifications. Please check User_talk:SuperDeng#Battle of Tali-Ihantala. Your opinions are valuable on the issue, so please participate. --Whiskey 21:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Nordwind[edit]

A source was cited which establishes that Operation Nordwind was the last major German offensive of the war. The same source "Riviera to the Rhine" makes it clear that the Battle of the Ardennes (Battle of the Bulge)was separate and distinct from the Battle of Alsace (Nordwind) so it is incorrect to place it within the chronology of the former. I also point out that the work of V.P. Charles von Luttichau supports "Riviera to the Rhine" as well as the Operational Histories of Seventh Army and 6th Army Group. Finally, "Riviera to the Rhine" is the official US Army history for Seventh Army, and is part of the US Army in WWII series. It was co-authored by the Chief Historian of the Army, Dr. Jeffrey Clarke. I also added a link to the combat history of the 14th Armored Division.14thArmored 2030 Hours 16 November 2006

Please see Earl F. Ziemke's "Stalingrad to Berlin: The German Defeat in the East." Ziemke makes it clear that Operation Frühlingserwachen was planned as a major counteroffensive, but that its execution, and the actual strength of the units involved did not fulfill that goal. Hitler may have thought it was a major counteroffensive too, but like you, he was looking at the Order of Battle on paper, not their actual combat strength. A major counteroffensive is determined by execution, not planning. 14thArmored 1100 Hours 17 November 2006

Alright I see now. Thanks for the new info. TheCheeseManCan 18:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 66.230.200.151 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Veinor (talk to me) 22:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's my school IP.

A WP:BLOCK is looming if you keep going on about this.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LEAVE GIGGSY ALONE!

June 2011[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phil Jones (footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. doomgaze (talk) 21:32, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah the old 2 strikes rule. You're Man United, you'll do what you want. TheCheeseManCan (talk) 21:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nah we're pretty lenient, four strikes normally then "out". I looked back at the page history and saw you received three previous ones (that you sneakily deleted). Not much to complain about really. doomgaze (talk) 21:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I knew I should have gotten a superinjunction so you wouldn't catch that. TheCheeseManCan (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Continuing the talk thread directly above, Religion. Please. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]