User talk:TheDragonFire300/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Csi: Miami: 4: Talk Page
I thought “Talk Page” could B about “Talking about Anything”?(2601:646:8501:9E60:F57E:F549:FED4:24B9 (talk) 06:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)).
- Sorry, but no. I already linked the relevant guideline you need to read. Here it is again: WP:NOTFORUM. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 06:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- In addition, I am not obligated to answer any question related to this issue, and I am free to remove any such question from this talk page. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 06:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
"Are you trolling" isn't much of a PA--please leave it be. And same with their talk page: I am looking into it. Drmies (talk) 22:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Drmies: I would believe that it would still be a violation of WP:AGF, as it assumes that, rather than simply trying to ask for sources for their opinion, it simply assumes that I am here just to troll him. But I'm not going to edit war over it; same with the talk page too, which I left behind after the ANI notice. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 22:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is not the kind of thing we usually redact, or block for. But I've already blocked the editor for their other violations. Thank you. If there is an ANI thread, you can close that. Drmies (talk) 22:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Drmies: There was an ANI thread, indeed. If there are no objections, I or another editor will close it. The NPA "vio" was on top of the main vio, which was the FORUM posts and advocacy of original research. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 22:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- That entire section was some complete BS, from the original editor and the IP. Sgerbic, things might not have gone this far if you had simply removed the post when you saw it. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not following this conversation at all. Is this about the Private Investigator post? I'm not the "remover" type of person, I'm more of a let's talk about this and hope that they will understand the rules of Wikipedia and help the improve it.Sgerbic (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Sgerbic: I understand that approach. After all, it's always possible that they'll eventually understand our policies and guidelines, and will be welcomed here. However, the user suffered from a huge case of WP:IDHT. Had I realised earlier and been more stringent about it, I might also have blanked it without discussion when it became apparent. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 02:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not following this conversation at all. Is this about the Private Investigator post? I'm not the "remover" type of person, I'm more of a let's talk about this and hope that they will understand the rules of Wikipedia and help the improve it.Sgerbic (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- That entire section was some complete BS, from the original editor and the IP. Sgerbic, things might not have gone this far if you had simply removed the post when you saw it. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Drmies: There was an ANI thread, indeed. If there are no objections, I or another editor will close it. The NPA "vio" was on top of the main vio, which was the FORUM posts and advocacy of original research. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 22:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is not the kind of thing we usually redact, or block for. But I've already blocked the editor for their other violations. Thank you. If there is an ANI thread, you can close that. Drmies (talk) 22:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)