User talk:TheIrishWarden/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Info about me

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Summa Metaphysica (2)

Hello Warden, I removed your CSD on this page. The author requested me to delete the other page and move this one in its place. Another editor decided it was not a problem to have 2 versions and removed my CSD. So, I will try it again. --  :- ) Don 15:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Adoption

Hey TIW! What would you like to learn next? Electric Catfish 23:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

What ever you think I'd be good at! I'm sort of off and on Wiki at the moment as I have been on holiday and I am going on holiday. Just leave a note and I should get back relatively soon. Thanks! Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 09:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Brian Leveson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brian Leveson.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 19:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your post on ElecticCatfish2's talk page

Hi TheIrishWarden, I'm concerned about your post on User talk:Electriccatfish2, and two parts of it particularly. The first is your comment about that everyone has sockpuppets, whilst I certainly can't comment for everyone I think it's safe to assure you that everyone does not have sockpuppets and if they do have alternate accounts that they are not being used for sockpuppetry. My other concern is your comment about "fun", whilst you make think that blatant breaches of Wikipedia's policies are fun, especially in a way which is very distrustful and disprutive, I can assure you that a great majority of Wikipedia's other editors would certainly not agree, at all, with that comment. I would ask that if you have been engaged in sockpuppetry, that you stop immediately (and consider disclosing those accounts, either here to to ArbCom and make a decision as to whether you are here to build an encyclopedia or have fun at other's expense. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Irish Warden. I, like Callanecc, was a bit concerned by the above as well -- dishonest sockpuppetry is never okay, and Wikipedia is not a game. —Theopolisme 21:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

I have blocked this account for self-admitted sock puppetry. A SPI has been filed in the meantime by Legoktm at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheIrishWarden. Snowolf How can I help? 18:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I have also removed your rollback userright, and I'd like to note for the record that there's not just self-admitted sockpuppetry but also vandalism. Snowolf How can I help? 18:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheIrishWarden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet operator and claimed this in protest and anger over electric catfish's blocking. If you look at my edit history I did do anti vandalism etc. my purpose to come back is to do good. I would appreciate if you understood my request. Thanks TIW

Decline reason:

There's no evidence that the editor's self-professed sockpuppet abuse isn't true. Beyond this, I see no reason in the unblock request to consider overturning the reasonable block already imposed. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not sure how that sits with your previous statements. Snowolf How can I help? 19:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
I understand your concerns about this comment, but I can assure you this is untrue. TIW Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 19:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Care to explain your confessions, then? Max Semenik (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheIrishWarden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fully understand the reluctancy of fellow wikipedians to unblock following my frankly outrageous comments. Please, I was not thinking and claimed this in anger of electric catfish being banned. What proof is there? None. Have any sockpuppet s been found? No. I was blocked without justice and with no evidence. If I do get unblocked I pledge to use this safely and nicely. Kind regards Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 22:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Electriccatfish2 was blocked (not banned) for one week some three weeks before your admission re sockpuppetry; I do not accept therefore that your explanation is reasonable, and your attitude as to sockpuppetry - fun, as you say - does not lead me to feel that you would be a useful editor here. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would also like to say that snowolf acted to quickly and dramatically and has made false accusations about vandalism above. I would like to report him for these two offences. Please advise how to. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 22:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

It's not part of what I usually ask while considering an unblock request, but since you claimed that you have sockpuppets: what's your original account on Wikipedia? Max Semenik (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

This is my original account on wiki. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 21:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TheIrishWarden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just stupid saying that sock puppetry was common and fun. I know from being on this account it is not and is harmful as I have experienced the effects of it before I was blocked. Electric catfish was a good friend on here to me and he helped me out a lot. I just released my anger without even thinking about what he had done. My words were stupid and really do not reflect my view on Wikipedia and sock puppetry at this present time. You may ask why I want to be unblocked? Well I want to come back stopping vandalism and verifying new pages as I did SO EFFECTIVELY before this ban was issue. I repeat myself that I now understand the extent of electrics offences on here. At the end of the day where is your proof that I ever had a sockpuppets, if you going to refuse this explain WHAT evidence you have. In a court of law I am not guilty without evidence. Whoever is reading this I ask for your word and I truly repent for my stupid words. Of course youvhave to be wary of potential dangerous accounts, but I'm not one and just want to come back and edit peacefully and without trouble. Also the incident was 3 months ago.. Thank you, Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 21:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

There are some problems with this request. To take your legal analogy, let's say you walked into a police station and confessed to 20 crimes. Do you think they would just say "I don't see any evidence of that get out of here" or do you think you might end up in the back with the detectives? I don't blame Snowolf one bit for blocking you after the way you were behaving, not only claiming to have all these other accounts but out-and-out trolling other user's talk pages about it. You did that, whether you really had all those socks or not. However, you seem to get how stupid it was and I hope I am correct in assuming we won't be seeing any more such outbursts from you in the future. We all make mistakes, I certainly have, but Wikipedians can be a surprisingly forgiving bunch if you own up to what you did, which you have. Welcome back. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I can assure you there will be no stupid behaviour in the future. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 07:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Stung Treng

Hi, would you mind taking another look at your reversion of an IP's edit on Stung Treng? Your message to the editor suggested that he or she did not explain the deletion of content, but the edit summary said 'Remove nonsense'. And frankly nonsense is what the material you restored seems to be. Mcewan (talk) 00:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

oh sorry, if I did that. I'll take a look now, I must be more careful. I've just come back from a block so I am just getting used to things again. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 07:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

Wifione Message 20:22, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Human impact on the environment

I restored your original reversion of the deletion by an IP user at the beginning of the article. I could not understand why you restored the deletion. Since you are a serious editor, I thought that perhaps I missed something here and I should ask you about it. Sorry for any annoyance. Donner60 (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

This was possibly an error on my behalf. Apologies. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 21:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I have undone a few of my own edits so I know about second thoughts and even about undoing the wrong one. Donner60 (talk) 21:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Lynda Shepherd

Why have you undone my edit? 90.223.153.5 (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC) IV Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Pope Francis I

Redirect pages should not contain anything below the redirect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.79.10.115 (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Prilog

Hi, I am issuing a problem with my village page Prilog. I can't find it when searching on wikipedia in english. I found Orasu-nou, which is the greater teritorial unit and I tried connecting the Prilog to Prilog, Satu Mare(romanian page) wich is the good page of this village. Do I have to create another page, with the same name in english? Or have we the possiblity to translate? Thanks!

(86.70.76.122 (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC))

go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk

216.62.217.90 is Prestonwood Baptist Church's IP address and is engaging in Conflict of Interest editing to remove references to a current controversy at the church. 76.4.38.53 (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Tip and apology

Hi there WARDEN, AL from Portugal here,

sorry for my manners in S.C. Olhanense (i have a bipolar disorder and have ZERO tolerance for vandalism), but my edits were 200% justified, the first was removing poor English - and an unsourced one! - and the second was reverting vandalism of the highest order OK?

Keep up the good work - --AL (talk) 19:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Reverted more vandalism in CURRENT SQUAD of the same article, David Silva plays for Manchester City F.C. so don't tell me that was not done on PURPOSE. I repeat, my summary in edit #2 was a bit aggressive i admit it, won't happen again --AL (talk) 19:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
ok, warning removed
Im the guy who was editing the article for brazil and i'm SO sorry, i'm new to wikipedia and i must have hit something on my computer. sorry and thank you for putting back the article.

Real name

Hey, I'm trying to omit my real name from some Google Search results. So I'm just replacing my past signature with my current one in some archives. Hopefully you don't object. Feedback ☎ 18:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC) No worries Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 18:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Messing up your User page

Sorry for messing up your User page! Sitethief~talk to me~ 20:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm reverting because that editor, 74.99.187.11, is writing something about a sequel that will never come to pass. --69.113.52.93 (talk) 20:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Duplication of flags

You duplicated the tricolour on your userpage (i.e. "Countries I've Visited"). I wonder if we ever crossed paths in your prior incarnations. Yours, Quis separabit? 20:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

been there for about 6 months with no problem Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 21:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I guess no one noticed. Yours, Quis separabit? 21:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer

Note that you do not need to create a header - read the small print at the top of the page for instructions! Warren (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Blocked indef

Looks like you just admitted yourself to be Hamish Ross (talk · contribs). In any case you were just joking, using an an open proxy to what it seems like to conceal your whereabouts to vandalize and attack users has earned yourself an indefinite block. Elockid (Talk) 22:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

I was coming here to warn you it was too early to run an RfA, but it looks like that won't be necessary. I hope Elockid is wrong about the socking, as although I've never seen you before you edited my talk page 2 weeks ago, you seem like a nice person and hopefully there is some explanation for the socking and/or use proxies. (This is how I knew you were planning a run.) At any rate even if this block had never happened I would have advised you not to run, and if you do get unblocked I recommend holding off on RfA for at least a year, as people will oppose, rightly or wrongly, for the now-recent blocks. But there are a lot of great things you can do on Wikipedia without being an admin and I hope you can be allowed back in. Please reply. —Soap— 00:10, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
This is a mistake, I never admitted to be anything to do with Hamish Ross. I wouldn't put in a FDA if I did that. What's your proof? Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 07:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheIrishWarden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that I have been wrongly accused, I never used proxy to conceal my identity and was editing through this account all last night. I've been editing responsibly for the last 2 months and am certainly nothing to do with IHamish Ross. I got one of his accounts blocked for god sake, last year! I come to wiki in order to edit nicely and revert vandalism and not to be an idiot cause harassment. From my honest mind I'm very confused and slightly upset that someone thinks I've done this. To me the user who has blocked me you have gone wrong somewhere along the line, is your proof I sent an email to CUTKD ( a confessed Hamish Ross sock) through wiki? He was a good friend on here up to when he started attacking. I have never and will never be anything to do with sockpuppetry and don't use proxy rubbish IPs. Plus I want an spi and not be blocked straight off unfairly, user acted too harshly and swiftly. Finally as Paula Abdul once said, “All my life, I have been taught to take the high road, and never to dignify salacious or false accusations. And I have been taught never, never to lie. Not only do I never lie, I never respond to lies, no matter how vicious, no matter how hurtful.” and that is true for me. Thank you Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 2:54 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

My CheckUser results are consistent with Elockid's - you used an open proxy to anonymously claim to be Hamish Ross. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:51, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Any admin can contact me privately if they want to learn more evidence about the block. @TheIrishWarden, like I say to other sockpuppeteers, you're not helping yourself by deliberately lying to us. I highly recommend that you retract your unblock request and explain your actions rather than saying that you didn't sock because it's quite evident that you did. In case you're wondering, the technical evidence is not the only piece of evidence that was the factor in this block. There are other pieces of evidence that I do not wish to share publicly. Elockid (Talk) 12:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

A sorry and Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheIrishWarden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been very silly and just plain stupid. I am deeply regretting my actions and do apologise to any users I have caused offence towards, I am certainly nothing to do with that toerag that goes by the name of Hamish Ross. I do have an excuse for this frankly inexcusable behaviour, yesterday I received some awful news about a close friend who is in a coma and I am greatly distressed and angry at what had happened, I am in deal shock and just needed to take my anger out on something. I stupidly chose wikipedia to direct my anger and unfortunately posted some harmful messages. I have now stopped and thought, I need to keep myself to myself and keep my distress private and not take it out on others. You must understand I am truly sorry and as from my edit history before I do constantly constructively edit for the counter vandalism cause. I do hope you understand my troubles and accept my excuse. If you want you can put me under a restriction to gain my trust although I can assure you I will make sure that happens. Also my deer fellow editors I am deepely sorry for lying about my involvement and I was just so distressed and simply could not believe that i had done what i had done. Furthermore last night this talk page was vandalised by another ip, this ip is nothing to do with me. There has been a clear effort somewhere to frame me with ip adresses, especially on Elockid's talk page, later last night someone was posting about turtles and chickens looking back at the edit history. I find it very odd that this has started happening as soon as I'm blocked although thats for the admins to solve. In this final sentence i really am truly sorry, the events outside wiki really caused me to cause harm and possibly upset to other users. Deepest regrets : I now really respect anyone who blocked me as they were in their right to do so, although I am really keen to improve the counter vandalism unit and re structure its current state. I just ask you to give me the benefit of the doubt and allow me a second chance. Wikipedia is now an important part of my life and I do love editing on it nicely and safely. These two days having it away really shows how I took granted of wikipedia and everyone on here. Best regards Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 09:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please appeal to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 13:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you were blocked based on CheckUser evidence, your block will not be overturned by a non-CheckUser admin. You may, however, make an appeal to ARBCOM's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh thanks a lot for telling me that. Regards Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 13:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
I have been so so so stupid to do this stuff, after my previous block for claiming I had sockpuppets (which was untrue) and then I go and use proxy IP's. I am so annoyed at myself and can't believe what I've done. This is an apology to anyone's talk page I vandalized using IP addresses. If I do get unblocked I will be making a substantial effort to say sorry to these users. Thanks Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 07:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

You really are a clot, aren't you? But, I have been in a bereavement situation and understand the need to lash out, however inaccurately; and I have been here a long time, and have seen a large number of your very responsible and sensible edits. If you do appeal to ArbCom let me know - here or via e-mail - and I will post a message of support. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:27, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Thankyou Anthony for understanding me, it's so hard to be in this situation and have people not supporting you. I have sent an appeal to Arbcom. Thanks Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 18:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have sent a request to arbcom 9 days ago and still have got no reply. I'm quite concerned and just want to get back editing constructively. Also with my arbcom is there like a page that has been created for my case?

To my knowledge ArbCom doesn't create pages to discuss block appeals; especially if CheckUser evidence is involved, that will be dealt with behind the scenes. You should receive a reply here at your talk page, but ArbCom may be busy and/or backlogged and thus may take some time to reply. Huon (talk) 18:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

BAD TRY

Just to let you know my previous account was FishingKing which I was blocked for sockpuppetry. I've already made a new account, but you won't find me. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:12, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Actually, I just found and blocked two accounts and the two open proxies you were using. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
I didn't even have 2 accounts Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 06:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

I've taken my Hat Off To You

Just for the fact you are Irish. I am a huge admirer of Irish people and culture...  Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello TheIrishWarden, Miss Bono has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!  Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

.

Thankyou for your support. I WILL continue to fight this war against fascism on Wikipedia and this campaign WILL continue and get nasty if I'm nit given justice soon. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 19:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Antifa_2.jpg

What seems to be the problem with you? Why are you fighting for?  Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
My problem is with Wikipedia. It is constitutionally based on a fascist state, we have a supreme leader whom can throw around their weight. Then their trusted generals (admins) who can be nice, but some are power hungry and bullying all the lower down users. IPs are seen as the scum of the earth, as well as new users. All I want is justics, the admin who blocked me was throwing around their weight and one of these fascist. North korea doesn't work and wiki doesn't, it's just fluffed up with propaganda of how wonderful it is. There is a true nasty underlying truth where the peasants (normal users) are oppressed and not aloud to do anything. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 19:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Can i help you?  Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Do you speak irish??  Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, bits and bobs. About you? Conas atá tú? Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

I wish i could speak irish. that's one of my dreams. do you like u2?? What's the Irish for Talk Page and User Page??? Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:26, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

like more traditional session music. Talk page= labhairt leathanach and user page= leathanach úsáideoir. I believe it is that, not fluent in it though. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
So, you are not a U2 fan. I've heard Irish people usually hate Bono. Is that true??  Miss Bono (zootalk) 12:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I don't mind U2 and I don't hate bono Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud 20:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkpage locked

I'm not sure what the heck you were thinking by using this talkpage as a soapbox while you're blocked (indeed, at any time at all), but your have forced me to remove talkpage access during the block. Such actions will also not help with becoming unblocked on this project. I'm truly shaking my head at these actions of yours - I expected better (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Unblocked

The Ban Appeals Subcommittee has voted to allow your appeal under the standard offer, and I have therefore unblocked your account. WormTT(talk) 12:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheIrishWarden/Archive2&oldid=1083968230"