User talk:TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki

April 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon (Southeast Asia), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at DreamWorks Channel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Disney Channel (Israel), you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at DreamWorks Channel, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 20:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon (Southeast Asia). Please see WP:BURDEN, please stop adding unsourced content to articles Waxworker (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Public holidays in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Official Gazette. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Ram1751. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Laddu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ram1751 (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 07:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Despite being warned about it last August, you have continued to add unsourced content, to articles such as the Snuggle page. You have been unresponsive to messages left here. This is highly disruptive. Graham87 (talk) 07:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, ho! @Graham87:The block notification says temporary, but the block log shows indefinite.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #87377 is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I'm not sure how I feel about any potential unblock. Graham87 (talk) 16:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello and good day to you Wikipedia administrators, please unblock me because the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and also, it is no longer necessary because I understand the reason why I was blocked for. I promise that I will not continue to cause damage or disruption through adding unsourced content, and also, I will make useful contributions instead. I'm sorry for adding unsourced content to articles such as the Snuggle Page I did a few days ago, and I promise I will not do it again.

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please — Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (talk) 11:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (talk) 07:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia administrators, please unblock me because the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and also, it is no longer necessary because I understand the reason why I was blocked for. I promise that I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and also, I will make useful contributions instead. I'm sorry for adding unsourced content to articles such as the Snuggle Page I did a few days ago, and I promise I will not do it again.

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello and good day to you Wikipedia administrators, I deeply apologize for adding unsourced content to articles such as the Snuggle page which made it highly disruptive, leading the block ot be imposed on me. I promise not to do that again and I will add useful contributions on any article from now on, as long as it's not causing damage or disruption to Wikipedia.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello and good day to you Wikipedia administrators, I deeply apologize for adding unsourced content to articles such as the Snuggle page which made it highly disruptive, leading the block ot be imposed on me. I promise not to do that again and I will add useful contributions on any article from now on, as long as it's not causing damage or disruption to Wikipedia. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello and good day to you Wikipedia administrators, I deeply apologize for adding unsourced content to articles such as the Snuggle page which made it highly disruptive, leading the block ot be imposed on me. I promise not to do that again and I will add useful contributions on any article from now on, as long as it's not causing damage or disruption to Wikipedia. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello and good day to you Wikipedia administrators, I deeply apologize for adding unsourced content to articles such as the Snuggle page which made it highly disruptive, leading the block ot be imposed on me. I promise not to do that again and I will add useful contributions on any article from now on, as long as it's not causing damage or disruption to Wikipedia. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Sincerely yours,

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (talk) 12:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to edit TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (talk) 08:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheOfficialPinkieTodoroki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I understand the reason why I was blocked for. I promise that I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and also, I will make useful contributions instead.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Your request is vague. Please explain clearly what edits led to the block imposed on you, what you will do differently to not make the same mistake again and what useful contributions you will make instead. ~ SG5536B (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #87438[edit]

is declined. STOP making UTRS requests while simultaneously contesting your block here. You already know this is inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 11:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]