User talk:TheSandDoctor/Archives/2020/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
Technical news
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Readers who were not logged in briefly saw the interface in a language decided by their browser. It should normally be in the language of the wiki. This happened for a short period of time last week. This was because of a bug. [1]
Changes later this week
- If you forget your password you can ask for a new one to be sent to your email address. You need to know your email address or your username. You will now be able to choose that you need to enter both your email address and your username. This will be a preference. This is to get fewer password reset emails someone else asked for. [2]
- When you asked for a new password you could see if the username didn't exist on Special:PasswordReset. Now the page will show the username you entered and tell you an email has been sent if the username exists. This is for better security. [3]
- On Special:WhatLinksHere you can see what other pages link to a page. You can see if the link is from a redirect. You can now see which section the redirect links to. [4]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 3 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 4 March. It will be on all wikis from 5 March (calendar).
Future changes
- The developers are working on a new interface to solve edit conflicts on talk pages. You can give feedback. [5]
- There is a vote on the creation of a new user group called abuse filter manager. The vote runs from March 1 to March 31 on Meta.
wgMFSpecialCaseMainPagewas used for the mobile site. It was deprecated in 2017. It will stop working in April. Wikis should see if they use it. If they do they should fix it. You can read more and ask for help. This affects 183 wikis. There is a list. [6]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
00:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
tb
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a new search word called
articletopic. You can use it to search for articles on a specific topic. It is available on the Arabic, Czech, English and Vietnamese Wikipedias. It will come to more Wikipedias soon. [7][8][9]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 10 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 11 March. It will be on all wikis from 12 March (calendar).
Future changes
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- The Wikipedia Android app will do push notifications if users want them. This could help you see for example when someone wrote on your talk page or your edit was reverted. This will come later this year. [10]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a new API module for changing the content model of existing pages. Use
action=changecontentmodelto specify the new model. You can read the documentation on mediawiki.org. [11]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 March. It will be on all wikis from 19 March (calendar).
Future changes
- If you edit a page at the same time as someone else you can get an edit conflict. There is a new two-column interface to make it easier to solve this. It will soon be active by default on the German, Arabic, and Farsi Wikipedias. It will be on by default on more wikis within the next months. You will be able to opt out of the new interface. [12][13]
- You can see a proposed design for replying to comments in an easier way.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are doing well. I just sent you an email, would you please take a look at it? Also, you can respond here :D —usernamekiran (talk) 06:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Usernamekiran: Replied. --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Just saw your second reply. I have already emailed the suppresser team. See you around
—usernamekiran (talk) 07:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Just saw your second reply. I have already emailed the suppresser team. See you around
Draft:Ninja Warrior: Le Parcours des héros
Did I need to add what to submit the draft? --197.253.238.115 (talk) 09:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Please read the comments on the draft, including this comment I left last October. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Not sure if this comes under BAG
...but can you take a look at User talk:Hydrargyrum#Please (and the thread just above it) and have a quiet word? EEng 18:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @EEng: Automated editing as described would. Thank you for bringing to my attention. I have not raised this angle at the moment, preferring to back up what has been said about fixing scripts (especially when concerns raised) and pointing to WP:ANI for any WP:HOUNDING reports/making it clear that these are serious accusations. I will bring up the WP:BAG aspect if necessary. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @EEng: On second thought, I expanded to cover. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Some development will be slower than planned. This is because of the current pandemic. You can see the new deployment guidelines. This is to avoid risks when some persons could be unavailable.
- There was a problem when adding interwiki links. The tool you use to add interwiki links could suggest the wrong project to link to. This has now been fixed. [14][15]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 March. It will be on all wikis from 26 March (calendar).
Future changes
- There is a project to make editing easier for newcomers. The developers are trying to understand what initiatives different Wikipedias have to welcome newcomers. They also want to know which templates are often used for maintenance activities. You can help this project by checking if your wiki's pages are listed on Wikidata.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, TheSandDoctor,
We typically block for username violations for editors who are actively editing. This editor made one edit 2 and 1/2 years ago and was not an active editor. You don't need to retroactively block inactive editors. If you review Wikipedia:Username policy#Dealing with inappropriate usernames, you'll see Also, except in extreme cases, it is probably not worth taking action unless the user has made at least one recent edit. I agree that this is an offensive username but I don't think it necessitated taking action now. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Liz: Per the top of the policy, usernames that are "offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, libelous, or disruptive" are examples of "[u]sernames...not allowed on Wikipedia and will be immediately blocked." That does not mention an expiry period. The section that you quoted states that your quoted text only applies "[i]f the name is not unambiguously problematic". While you are definitely correct in some borderline cases/minor violations it is usually useless to block a username, from my viewpoint this particular username is a violation worthy of an immediate block without warning. There is no perceivable positive gain for the encyclopedia in allowing such a username to potentially be used in the future, so I handled it as it should have been done years ago. In addition, even if your quote applied to blatant username violations, it is a suggested practice. It doesn't say they cannot be blocked after a certain length of time has elapsed, if you feel that it should I would be open to starting up a conversation/RfC on the policy talk page. But, as of now, such a measure would seem to contradict the documented community consensus requiring immediate blocks for blatant violations. --TheSandDoctor Talk 17:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- We deal with a lot of these cases at UAA—obviously disruptive usernames that have never edited. The UAA instructions say to not to even report these usernames and {{UAA}} gives us the option to decline these reports as "wait until the user edits". I still block them 100% of the time, because there's no benefit to the project in taking the same amount of time to decline the report without blocking them, and likewise no harm to the project in softblocking them since they are required to change their username if they want to edit anyway, and will at best be blocked if they try to edit and at worst they will start editing and fly under the radar. In saying
"it is probably not worth taking action"
, the intent of the policy guidance is clearly that we need not tie up valuable volunteer time and resources blocking every inactive username violation that will probably never pose a problem; it's not worth it. That's not to say these usernames shouldn't be blocked or that there is any problem in doing so. ~Swarm~ {sting} 00:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- We deal with a lot of these cases at UAA—obviously disruptive usernames that have never edited. The UAA instructions say to not to even report these usernames and {{UAA}} gives us the option to decline these reports as "wait until the user edits". I still block them 100% of the time, because there's no benefit to the project in taking the same amount of time to decline the report without blocking them, and likewise no harm to the project in softblocking them since they are required to change their username if they want to edit anyway, and will at best be blocked if they try to edit and at worst they will start editing and fly under the radar. In saying
Rollback request
I would l like to ask you to give me rollback rights. I have experience with reverting vandalism and I feel this tool will help me. I will not use this ability in ways it should not be used such as edit warring. Jcoolbro (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) Jcoolbro (talk) 21:36, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi SandDoctor,
I have just tried to make my first edits to Wikipedia. Unfortunately I didn't realise that it was a bad idea to edit a BLP that is of myself! Now it seems the BLP is to be deleted which seems wrong for the reasons I have listed on the deletion page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Guy_Fixsen
The thing is I can provide good sources if that's what is needed to stop the article being deleted, but I guess I'm not allowed to as it would be a COI?
Any advice much appreciated!
Guy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guyfixsen (talk • contribs) 17:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Guyfixsen: If you can provide good sources, then by all means present them at the deletion discussion. It is just generally discouraged that you edit articles about yourself and generally encouraged that you make suggested changes on the article's talk page. Please let me know if this helps any. --TheSandDoctor Talk 17:13, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks SandDoctor - I have put in a bunch of links to articles about me, books that contain quotes from me, IMDb page, discog page etc. in the deletion discussion - is that the right sort of thing you mean by good sources?
- Also, how does the deletion decision get resolved? Is there a time limit for comments or something?
- Thanks
- Guyfixsen (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Guyfixsen: I just commented on your talk page about the sourcing, actually. Deletion discussions typically last for 7 days, though that may vary. I would encourage you to read about the deletion process here. --TheSandDoctor Talk 17:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The beta version of the Wikipedia app for Android can now help users add tags on Commons. These tags are called depicts. [16]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 31 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 April. It will be on all wikis from 2 April (calendar).
Future changes
- The video player will change to be simpler and more modern. The current beta feature will become the video player for everyone. The old player will be removed. [17]
- There is a project to make templates easier to use. The next few weeks the developers will present ideas on the project page. You can watch that page if you are interested in giving feedback. [18]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Possible block evasion
Hi there. Thank you for blocking this editor. It's probably just an amazing coincidence but this totally brand-new editor has just redone one of WiredScore's edits, cloned very closely at the molecular level. If we are very lucky I suppose they will turn up with a load of new usernames and redo all the other ones too, because that's a great way to get your promotional stuff into Wikipedia. Or am I excessively cynical? You might want to have a look, though I will quite understand if you can't be bothered! :) Thanks and best wishes 82.39.96.55 (talk) 11:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. This was also noticed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WiredScore and they have been blocked. --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)