Hello The Damaja! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukini 15:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McPhail 00:59, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not capitalise moves that are not proper nouns, e.g. "Jumping cutter" rather than "Jumping Cutter". Also, please do not remove notes from articles, as you did with "Stone Cold" Steve Austin. McPhail 19:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McPhail 21:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not change the title format... the format used in the lashley page is the new format being introduced into wrestling articles where avaliable... please do not change this again it will be considered vandalism. --- Paulley 18:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to WrestleMania 23. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --3bulletproof16 02:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted it, as I said in the edit history for my edit: he was NEVER known as that on WWE shows. The page lists people by their WWE name (or names) only. RobJ1981 23:12, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:PW before editing any more wrestler articles. The way you edit specific sections is not how was agreed and could be construed as vandalism. SteveLamacq43 00:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SteveLamacq43 13:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- THLCCD 06:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you refuse to read the WP:PW guidelines? You've been asked, and told, and you're still making bad edits. So This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SteveLamacq43 23:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop editing wrestler articles, it's obvious you've been advised to read the guidelines, advice which you have ignored. Your edits (adding unoffical move names, changing Championship format...) are not helpful, and go against the agreed guidelines. You've been warned numerous times, and now I add a final one:
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BertieBasset 00:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DavyJonesLocker 23:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jลмєs Mลxx™ Msg me My contribs 00:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Damaja. I know that you are actually trying to make good edits, and we all appreciate the effort. However, there are many guidelines that have been laid out which must be followed. Please read everything following Style Guide on the page WP:PW. These are the guidelines that must be followed, and the reason so many of your edits have been undone. This is also the reason that you have been given so many warnings. Please read this over and follow the guidelines. Failure to do so may result in you being blocked. Please do this, as these guidelines aren't going to change anytime soon. Thank you for your cooperation. -- THL 04:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you may ask any questions that you have on the talk page of WP:PW. Cheers, -- THL 04:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Damaja, here is a direct link to Style Guide, in case you are too lazy to go there yourself. Please, me and The Hybrid highly recommend your review this before continuing to edit articles. I cannot stress enough that if you fail to comply, your edits will be reverted, and you will be blocked from editing all articles on wikipedia. I think that you have the potential to be a good editor, you just need to learn more before going on. If you need any help with anything related to articles (as in what should be deleted or modified), go to the talk page of WP:PW, or contact me or The Hybrid. Once again, thank you for your cooperation. --Jลмєs Mลxx™ Msg me My contribs 04:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- THL 09:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Guysperanza.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
License tagging for Image:Originalpanteralogo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Originalpanteralogo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Guysperanza.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 04:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Originalpanteralogo.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Originalpanteralogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello The Damaja! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondarysources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Please provide a reliable source about his full name and middle initial. The article is a Good Article which means it has passed a review that all of the content is cited by a reliable source. Royalbroil 14:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Death to False Metal is considered an official studio album. There have been reliable sources, e.g. personal quotes from the band, that have confirmed the fact. It doesn't matter what WE consider the album to be; if the BAND considers the album their ninth, then it is. Please, don't remove this information again. Thank you. WereWolf (talk) 23:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to the page Big K.R.I.T. appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. STATicmessage me! 19:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find a source that supported the jersey number you added for LeBron James, so I removed it. If this is verifiable, feel free to add it back with a url to a reliable source in the edit summary. Thanks.—Bagumba (talk) 08:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Pettigrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 23:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychoschizophrenia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, The Damaja. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading Image:Originalpanteralogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello The Damaja! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Your recent edit to the page Big K.R.I.T. appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. STATic message me! 19:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
