User talk:The Internet is for Porn
You seem to be here to do good but Im just alerting you that you may be asked to change your username. —Soap— 23:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- I understand if this is the policy. I took a look at the guidelines and was not sure if the name met your requirements. Is there someone I can ask about this? The Internet is for Porn (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Opening a Request for comment on your username might be the best way to find out. noisy jinx huh? 23:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Possible, but there is also a page specifically reserved for cases like this: Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/holding pen. Personally, I dont have a problem with the name, but if he wants to edit highly visible articles then there might be a problem with keeping up our "professionalism" appearance. —Soap— 00:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I see the problem. Maybe making a new name would be better. :-) The Internet is for Porn (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I apologize, as I blocked your account for ~2 seconds before I realized that others had initiated a conversation with you. FWIW, I tend to agree that a new username may be best. If I can help with anything (and again, I apologize for the brief block), please let me know. TNXMan 00:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- That's okay, I can see why my username was causing some problems. I went ahead and created a new account at User:Sheeana. The Internet is for Porn (talk) 00:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I apologize, as I blocked your account for ~2 seconds before I realized that others had initiated a conversation with you. FWIW, I tend to agree that a new username may be best. If I can help with anything (and again, I apologize for the brief block), please let me know. TNXMan 00:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I see the problem. Maybe making a new name would be better. :-) The Internet is for Porn (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Possible, but there is also a page specifically reserved for cases like this: Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/holding pen. Personally, I dont have a problem with the name, but if he wants to edit highly visible articles then there might be a problem with keeping up our "professionalism" appearance. —Soap— 00:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Opening a Request for comment on your username might be the best way to find out. noisy jinx huh? 23:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Shabir has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --GnoworTC 00:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- No, the word is spelled with 2 R's; ForPorn was correct in fixing the typo. —Soap— 00:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- No worries, it's a common misspelling; I do that myself all the time. The Internet is for Porn (talk) 00:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I just checked your contributions, and the edit to Shabir isn't the only edit of yours that was reverted. I added to your message on Gnowor's talk page, and I'll get started reverting the incorrect reverts. —LedgendGamer 00:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed. It's an error on my part. Sincere apologies. Further response on my talk page.--GnoworTC 02:32, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- I just checked your contributions, and the edit to Shabir isn't the only edit of yours that was reverted. I added to your message on Gnowor's talk page, and I'll get started reverting the incorrect reverts. —LedgendGamer 00:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- No worries, it's a common misspelling; I do that myself all the time. The Internet is for Porn (talk) 00:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- No, the word is spelled with 2 R's; ForPorn was correct in fixing the typo. —Soap— 00:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)