User talk:The Lamb of God

Welcome!

Hello, The Lamb of God, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 22:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Content fork reverted[edit]

If you want to make Modulation transfer function as a content fork of Optical transfer function, start a split proposal at the latter. The way you wrote "The Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) is used to approximate the position of best focus of an infrared imaging system" represents a very narrow application article, not an article on MTF; that content might be more useful in article such Focusing an infrared optical system, though even that's too narrow, as there's nothing specific to IR, is there? Dicklyon (talk) 00:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generally one answers where the conversation started; I answered your answer on my talk page, in case you didn't notice (if you automatically put pages you edit on your watchlist, and check it, you'll notice when someone replies to your talk items). Dicklyon (talk) 03:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help Dick, (Concerning my being new to Wikipedia), it is welcome and appreciated. You would be welcome to move my MTF article onto your OTF article as an infrared imaging applications subarticle. It seems that that would probably make the most sense to combat its narrowness. Right now, as you have already noticed I am continuing with other pages and will be busy with those for awhile. Feel free to suggest anything else. The Lamb of God (talk) 15:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Field of view (image processing)[edit]

I have nominated Field of view (image processing), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Field of view (image processing). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dicklyon (talk) 04:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Dicklyon (talk) 04:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:ES cavity black body.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ES cavity black body.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signal_to_noise_ratio_(image_processing)#Net_signal.2C_signal.2C_and_background[edit]

you might be interested in helping clarify Talk:Signal_to_noise_ratio_(image_processing); thanks. Fgnievinski (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Extended Source Black Body.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Extended Source Black Body.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:1951 USAF Resolution Test Target.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1951 USAF Resolution Test Target.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dicklyon (talk) 00:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]