User talk:The Nerdy science

November 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of top 1000 universities in the world, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 15:45, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to ThePrint—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Andethyst (talk) 16:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to ThePrint. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andethyst (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

now that i have completely read and understand the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia. and being banned from it from many days. I kindly request you to remove my indefinite ban.

Respectively The Nerdy Science The Nerdy science (talk) 22:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Nerdy science (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now that i have completely read and understand the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia. and being banned from it from many days. I kindly request you to remove my indefinite ban. although i have made edits with proper sources on al jazeera english from their own sites, i have been banned from making edits. Moderators have misunderstood that edit as vandalism. please have a look at my edits and if you find them as vandalism then i promise to try to never make such edits again. I pledge to make my edit be constructive to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

What nonsense. Your edits were clear vandalism and you did not use proper sources. For example, this edit does not cite any sources at all. Yamla (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

“Yamala” recently reviewed my last unblock request and edits of mine.pointed out this edit and said it was poorly cited. so, i want to clarify that i was new at Wikipedia at that time. then after some time i learnt about citing and stuff. Although I definitely did those edits on some basis, i kindly apologize for that mistake. I was mainly blocked for this edit is mentioning truth with sources of their own website Vandalism??? if yes then please tell me how it is. and if not then please tell how to make these. Thank you for your time and please unblock me. thanks The Nerdy science (talk) 20:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Nerdy science (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the moderator namely “Yamala” recently reviewed my last unblock request and edits of mine.pointed out this edit and said it was poorly cited. so, i want to clarify that i was new at Wikipedia at that time. then after some time i learnt about citing and stuff. Although I definitely did those edits on some basis, i kindly apologize for that mistake. I was mainly blocked for this edit is mentioning truth with sources of their own website Vandalism??? if yes then please tell me how it is. and if not then please tell how to make these. Thank you for your time and please unblock me. thanks

Decline reason:

Your purpose in being here seems to be to tell how bad Al-Jazerra is. There are places you are free to do that, Wikipedia isn't one of them. If you want to help us build this encyclopedia of human knowledge, please agree to not edit about A-J and tell what you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will not edit about Al Jazeera, but instead edit in what i have knowledge in. Hinduism, principles of hinduism, deities, scientific topics, chemistry (my mastery subject) and physics. The Nerdy science (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Nerdy science (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not edit about Al Jazeera, but instead edit in what i have knowledge in. Hinduism, principles of hinduism, deities, scientific topics, chemistry (my mastery subject) and physics.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia editors don't rely on personal knowledge of topics to edit articles about them. Editors summarize and paraphrase material that has been previously published by reliable and independent sources. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]