User talk:The Shrimps are stronger
July 2020[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bioshock. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- How is it Destructive because I'm editing as to what actually happens in the game The Shrimps are stronger (talk) 17:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- I mean disruptive The Shrimps are stronger (talk) 17:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- It's disruptive because your edits have been challenged by multiple editors and you are disrupting the encyclopedia itself. As it says above - take it to the article talk page and justify your inclusions there - before putting them back in. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- PS:The spelling and grammar is atrocious. Even if your edits were justified on content, they would be reverted on presentation grounds. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
How is it atrocious The Shrimps are stronger (talk) 17:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
The Shrimps are stronger, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi The Shrimps are stronger! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC) |
Edit warring[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Sergecross73 msg me 17:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:The Shrimps are stronger. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
How am i doing personal attacks on people The Shrimps are stronger (talk) 18:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- You called someone a “Karen”. I was about to give you a warning about that too but Chris Troutman beat me to it. Sergecross73 msg me 18:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)