User talk:The Thing That Should Not Be/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Until It Sleeps/Menu

Welcome Vandal Fighter

Thank you for your efforts in keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism. You might want to check out this page, as it contains a wealth of information concerning vandal fighting - including some powerful tools to make your work more productive. Once again, welcome aboard! Dust Filter 03:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

thank you. also is there a way for me to make or have a template that lists all of the user talk warning templates on my user page?--Vandalism destroyer 03:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

All the templates that I know of are located here. You can preview the warnings interactively on that page and, if you want them on your user-page, the relevant code is available for easy cut-and-paste. Hope this helps. Dust Filter 03:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I saw your message on the RC patrol talk page, just wanted to recommend that you install WP:TWINKLE. It will make your life a lot easier. It virtually automates reverting, warning, and reporting of vandalism. Easy to install and use too. - Crockspot 21:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Cat w red-eye

Hi. Would you move Image:Cat with red-eye effect.JPG to Commons? I would like to create a derivative (cropped) version and that would be easier to do with cross-referencing if your image is already on Commons. Thanks! --Una Smith (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Um, ok how exactly do i do that? Vandalism destroyer (talk) 20:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Revert

If you had actually checked my edit, instead of just reverting it, you would have seen that I had deleted gibberish, and that I had, in fact, given a reason. 66.188.254.197 (talk) 05:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I see now, my bad. Thank you for contacting me about that. It just seemed like you deleted most of the article. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 07:35, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


No worries mate. Sorry for my snarly response. I was just kind of upset at being shot down for contributing. 66.188.254.197 (talk) 08:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Musician article

I'm trying to delete the page you have sent me a warning about, as I am "brand new" to using the Wikipedia and am only trying to help a Musician create a Wikipedia reference and as you can tell stumbling through. So please, if you would delete what I've done I'd greatly appreciate it. I've printed out information on creating on the site but if you can give me any more directive's I'd appreciate it. Sam1957

Well, I don't remember sending you a warning. There isn't even a warning from me on your talk page, although there are warnings from other editors on the same subject. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


your RfA

I've removed it from the RfA page; the code is all messed up, you haven't finished the questions and it hasn't been properly transcluded. I'd advise not moving it to the RfA page until you answer Q3. Ironholds 10:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I'll work on it some more, but I'm afraid I won't be able to re-submit it 'till tomorrow. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 10:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

That's fine; like I said it isn't really meant to be moved to the main page until it's finished. May I suggest, with all due respect, that you don't submit the RfA in the forseeable future? I think it's unlikely (read: impossible given the circumstances) that you will pass. You've got 500-odd edits, you don't tend to use edit summaries that much and all of your edits seem to be anti-vandal work; nothing in other sections of the wiki that would give the impression you know policy regarding anything other than vandalism. In addition you seem to have vanished for a large chunk of time; as an editor you've effectively been here for about a month. I'd advise submitting it in 3-4 months or so, and spending that time working on things other than anti-vandal work. Ironholds 11:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Ah, yes I see. I suppose I should wait a while, and build up my stats as an editor. Thank you for the advice. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 20:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
No problem :). If you need any help with editing or policy, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Remember: adminship is not the be-all and end-all; admins are equal to other users, just slightly more "trusted". You can still be a good editor without the banhammer (says a man who's failed RfA's 3 times). Ironholds 22:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Booty Call (film)=

Hi, I did not mean to vandalize that but booty call is in fact under the sex comedy genre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by King scooter 123 (talkcontribs) 09:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

That was quick

I was still editing the page and had planned on providing a summary when finished. First edit, any other advice? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stupid user (talkcontribs) 05:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

article "Bottom Girl" needs attention, not reverts

Hi Vandal Destroyer,


First, thanks for your efforts. I contribute randomly and anonymously (not yet set up an account), so I respect anyone who does the down and dirty work of keeping wikipedia running.

You caught my attention because you reverted an edit I made which was just -- not vandalism -- on the page 'Bottom Girl.' I tried to annotate my changes, but it could easily have looked like vandalism. So, since you reverted me (I reverted you too, but you get seniority: so...), I'm gonna try to drop this project in your lap. Here's the problem with the article, hopefully you can handle it more elegantly than I was trying to (I'm not super-familiar with Wikipedia best-practices): a link in the article, in fact the only live weblink, was to a site that my browser warned me has been distributing malware. I have no idea if the link is valid -- I suspect the citation is valid, but not properly linked (that is, the document it sites may be correct, but the link may or may not be the actual file -- the link is broken, regardless.

I'd invite you to see the changes I made -- documented in an untutored and probably non-standard fashion -- but it's all there. For what it's worth, the link itself is, at the very least, dead. The domain is probably created for the sake of hosting malware -- the domain name seems to have little to do with the content of the citation, and the 'whois' turns up something in Thailand (the link cites a NGO in Hawaii, for what it's worth).

Sorry for the long-winded follow-up, but I wanted to give you as much information as I had.


Cheers,


Ryan. 69.107.8.123 (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I see now. I just tried the link and FireFox blocked it as an "Attack site". Thank you for taking the time to point this out to me. I apologize, it just looked like vandalism, since in the history I saw "MALWARE IS HOSTED AT THIS SITE" or something along those lines. To me it appeared as if a malware link was being posted on the article.

Well thank you for pointing that out. This may have very well protected someone from clicking that link in an unprotected browser (Although I have no idea why someone would want to click that.) Vandalism destroyer (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

New section

Did you read the article ?This is a fictional article there is no such player.He is not mentioned anywhere except on a "blog" and in a youtube video.READ IT , look what kind of syntax this uses.http://sizandinho.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.27.216 (talk) 22:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk to me

Before reverting my edit , talk to me. I'm serious about the article being fictional and I know for fact it is. Letting it be as is jeopardizes wikipedia's status of a serious encyclopedia.

HERES a good reference for sizan read this blog. http://sizandinho.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.html

http://sizandinho.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.html THIS IS A FICTIONAL article can't you see??just read the blog and it would become obvious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.27.216 (talk) 22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Please, talk to an administrator like: User:J.delanoy. I am not an administrator, so I really cannot do anything about this matter. J.Delanoy, however is. so talk to him, please. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 22:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Could you look at this vandalism please

[1] The diffs are 1, 2, 3, 4 and the user is User:203.35.175.217. I'm patrolling recent changes and found this, but I can't undo that far back. I don't know how to undo this and don't have rollbacker. Thanks Fr33kmantalk APW 00:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Never mind I received rollback and did it my self. Thanks! Fr33kmantalk APW 05:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Did nothing wrong

Read comments regarding modifications before spamming and threatening user, kplzthnx. BristollovesLevi (talk) 02:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

According to your talk page, you were warned several times about reverting that particular article. --Vandalism destroyer (talk) 02:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
That is a lie. There was only one warning and no opportunity for clarification before you decided to act like a know-it-all admin. If you read *any* of my commentary you would know that I cited what was asked for!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!! BristollovesLevi (talk) 03:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

A new BS!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
It's really unusual and satisfying to see someone who, even before he created an account, decided to dedicate his skill to protecting the integrity of the Wiki from vandalism. Good work!  Marlith (Talk)  03:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey, no problem. Just keep up the excellent suppression of vandalism while keeping a rational mind toward innocent edits. Good luck.  Marlith (Talk)  03:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Piedmont, Ca

Why have you marked my changes as vandalism? I have cited sources such as http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ror/assembly_09_03_04.pdf . Also, any search on the internet shows that Piedmont is registered republican under 11%. Maybe I should write "In contrast with the rest of the United States, ..." Other neighboring areas such as Pleasanton, Fremont, and the Stockton metro area are much more conservative. Please take my argument seriously, as I can provide other sources also, but I consider this one reputable enough. 76.102.193.102 (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Because your edit was rather harsh, plus you have been reverted before. You should have added the text to the article in a more "Friendly" way, instead of replacing text in the article.

Can you help me rephrase it? I have that source above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.193.102 (talk) 05:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Try putting "Mostly liberal" after "Extremely affleunt", in a way so that it says something like:

"Piedmont is a small, extremely affluent city in Alameda County, California, United States, which has been described as mostly liberal."

This will give the edit an appearance of being constructive with the source.

Vandalism destroyer (talk) 05:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

How can I cite the source? Should I just put it in the edit space as before?

Howbout I talk to you tomorrow about this, my laptop battery is getting low. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 05:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.193.102 (talk) 05:58, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

hai

I totally saw you on #wikipedia. I r cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.60.87 (talk) 02:01, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

You are gay

You are gay!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.183.64 (talk) 21:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for that comment. I shall consider this statement you have given me, and respond accordingly. Uh, no I am not. But thanks for trying to do whatever it was you were trying to accomplish. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 21:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Hey vandalism destroyer, despite the unaccepatable comment from 69.249.183.64 calling them a dillweed is no way to respond. I'd post a proper warning, save for the fact that he started it and that you only said he was trying to be a dillweed, for all the diffrence it makes, please stay cool Theterribletwins1111 (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Changed. Vandalism destroyer (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou Theterribletwins1111 (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

your userpage

is now, messed up. Full reply is on my talk page, or look at my contribs. J.delanoygabsadds 16:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Do you want me to tweak it some more to make it even harder to vandalize, and/or semi-protect your real userpage? J.delanoygabsadds 16:15, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
OK, done. Check it out now... [evil laugh] J.delanoygabsadds 16:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

If the vandalism gets really bad, you can usually get it semi-protected for a few hours. Admins really don't like protecting user talk pages for long periods of time, because it removes the only way of contacting a user in a timely manner. So the most you can do usually is revert/warn/report and put up with it. If it gets out of hand, file a report on WP:RFPP. Cheers! J.delanoygabsadds 04:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

I just have to say that your userpage is the coolest ever! A vandal goes into the edit mode and finds nothing to vandalize. That is so awesome. Do you mind telling me how you did it? In order to keep the vandals out of the loop, it be best to e-mail me. We vandal hunters have got to help each other out.--Matt (talk) 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Never mind about telling me. I think I get it now. That is so cool! Thanks anyway!--Matt (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Bonjour, Je m'appelle Shimigawa!

こんにちは私はShinigawa Tsikiraである。を愛する 私はWikipediaをできるだけ破壊することを愛する本当にありがとう! ST だを愛するけ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shimigawa Tsikira (talkcontribs) 02:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Uhhhhhh......... what? Vandalism destroyer (talk) 03:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Huggle bug report

Hi there. Your bug report which has been added to this section has been read and dealt with. A new version of huggle(0.8.2) has just been released and I would be grateful If you could download it and test it to make sure that this bug has been fixed :). Thanks for the report and if you wish to reply to this message could you please use my talk page as I have sent this message to more people that just you. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 10:27, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

What is vandalism?

Here you did not revert vandalism, but personal commentary. You should've warned the editor about that instead of "vandalism". You might want to have a look at this. Just pointing that out. Have a nice day and happy editing! --Pwnage8 (talk) 01:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Just a note that this edit isn't vandalism. He actually did cancel events to go see his grandmother, it's just undue weight. GrszReview! 01:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Just felt like vandalizing your user talk page while I talk to you on IRC... lmao... - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 07:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

yea

completely unintentional...

i've never seen it either Wysprgr2005 (talk) 00:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Main Page redesign

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, PretzelsTalk! 10:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the message, I kinda like the new designs. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 13:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

help..

i'm not vandalising wikipedia's search pages.. somehow i keep getting messages that say i've done so.. help??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by INNOCENT0987 (talkcontribs) 06:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Wrong IP

Hello, I am referring that you sent me a message that I have edited a section on a person. I DO NOT remember that I had changed the biography of that to some explosive words. And I was banned from editing any page because of that. I was confused as I used wikipedia often and I do obey the rules, but I do not recall writing that explosive. I would like Wikipedia to check again, as my internet has been changed recently and is shared among 4 users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.7.136 (talk) 08:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Just like to say that I am a "Vandalism Destroyer Destroyer". Enjoy your hand. 81.156.189.5 (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

So, Willy on Wheels. We meet at last. I would just like to say that I hope you enjoy vandalising wikipedia, because I enjoy reverting it. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 20:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Not Me

Not vandalising. Wrong IP AGAIN.—Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Yeonie (talkcontribs) 08:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


Wikithanks! :D

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

Thank you
for reverting the vandalism on my page.


Pure pwnage in your username, btw. :D :D :D —La Pianista (TCS) 20:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 20:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Uhh, thanks. Lol. I only revert vandalism when im bored. And the last i reverted was about an hour ago? And breaks? Lol, sure, I would, if it gets dull or crap. ;) Well im only 13, so yeah. Just helping wiki out, you know. Thanks Again. II MusLiM HyBRiD II Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja 15:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 15:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Kamau Kambon

Please observe Wikipedia policies and adhere to an article's discussion page before making edits on your own that conflict with the conclusions of such discussion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kamau_Kambon#Racist_ethnocentric_should_be_added.2Fkept

68.46.139.114 (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Your warning + revert of User talk:85.18.227.219

User 85.18.227.219 is in the right. His edit was on a page where the words he used were appropriate (bidet). Please remove his warning. -- ScaldingHotSoup (talk) 13:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Administrator Coaching.

Alright, to get started, create a sub-page at User:Vandalism destroyer/Coaching, or User:Until It Sleeps/Admin coaching, or something similar. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

I will be able to as soon as I get home. Right now, either my school computers are being retarded, or MediaWiki is, but I find myself completely unable to log into either of my accounts. Sorry for the delay. User:V D on a public PC (Not logged in) 205.121.101.20 (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
I concur. Done. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 22:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Grammar

It's "vandalisms" not "vandalism's." I was going to change myself, but I couldn't... Lunakeet 15:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Bring Me The Horizon

This band fucking sucks and is not talented, therefore I have a right to vandalize their page.

So..., because the band sucks you have the right to vandalize their page huh? Well, I don't see whats stopping you right now. Go ahead, but prepare for the consequences. User:V D on a public PC (Not logged in) 205.121.101.20 (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for reverting this vandalism on my user page! Andrea (talk) 00:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. V D on a public PC (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I concur! VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 22:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Cheers =)

Thanks for checking the edit summary and removing the edit on my talk page. I had spoken with TenPoundHammer already before undertaking the changes, and he agreed it was a change he'd make, so I wanted to make the changes there before putting Kenny's album in (still red as you see it at this moment). I'm just about to go check Seger's discography to ensure the links are properly linked to the new page. Feel free to follow up in case I miss any if you wish. =)

CycloneGU (talk) 01:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 22:49, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

just trying to defend myself.

some guy created the user id cheryliscool based on my AIM sn, LJ account, etc. He's been harassing me and I'm sick of it. Sorry if it came across like vandalism, but really I was trying to get back at the weasel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadeflavis (talkcontribs) 02:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I understand. But, however, it is not appropriate on Wikipedia to attack another user. This is what is called a Personal attack. You should take this matter up wiht someone that you trust. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 02:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

true true. point taken. just wanted to let you know i'm not some crazy person who runs around attacking random peeps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadeflavis (talkcontribs) 02:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

RFA

Do you want to be an administrator of vandalism? Do you want to have a lot of deferences? Read it here! MHLUtalk 17:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but no thanks. I'm not quite ready to become an administrator quite yet. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 03:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

The Foxes (band)

Wow, thanks for your speedy 1 minute vandalism revert made by the user Jamie1130! I'm not sure how/if I can, but if I could, I would give you a badge. Thanks again - much appreciated! Blaze42 (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Well there is such a thing called a barnstar that you could give me. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 21:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, thanks! Blaze42 (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I award this Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your speedy efforts in protecting an article I created. Thanks! Blaze42 (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Careful, my friend. You reverted my vandalism-reversion and reintroduced nonsense into the page.    SIS  21:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah, you fixed it now. Thanks. Happy hunting :-)    SIS  21:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


I know. as soon as I saw that, I reverted my own edit. Huggle must have a glitch because it's not supposed to do that. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 22:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

Hey, how do you do this on huggle? The only way I know of for reverting edits by more than one user is to open it in external browser and use Twinkle. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 03:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

You have to go back to the most recent revision of vandalism in Huggle, by cliking the blue arrow until you get to he diff that compares the vandalism to a previous revision, and revert that. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 03:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Ah, thanks. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 18:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Blame Steve/Sakmeh

He dared me for that :D DentalHygenist (talk) 04:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

*Sigh* Samekh... VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 04:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Neutralhomer/Userboxes/Tibet‎

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to the userbox. Much appericated. - NeutralHomerTalk • November 18, 2008 @ 05:35

You're welcome. V D on a public PC (talk) 17:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

a shiny

The Huggle Barnstar
Thanks for helping me figure out why Huggle was screwing up on me. Cheers! J.delanoygabsadds 02:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

screamo

Hello , what i posted on the screamo page, it is true . Its not vandalism .

Well that seemed rather like vandalism to me. Even if it wasn't vandalism, It didn't have a concrete source to back it up, and it seemed to violate Wikipedia's Neutral point of view, which attempt to appeal to a worldwie audience. The reason for this is that what one community may think is true about something cannot always be said for a different community. It may be true that mainly homosexuals listen to the album in one community, but it may not be true for other communities. Also, I should suggest that you put talk page posts at the bottom of the talk page instead of the top which you did originally. And please sign your posts by typing four tildes (VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 04:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)) at the end of your post. Thank you. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 04:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For all your hard work reverting vandalism, hence your name ;-) Keep it up! Ashbey…whisper… 02:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Ashbey. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 02:59, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


Heh

Your name does not lie... :D —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 05:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

You got that too? :/ –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 05:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes I did. I've been seeing it in Huggle in various times of the day. This is specifically the reason the reason that I have a user talk queue set up in Huggle. Vandalism Destroyer 06:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. Pdfpdf (talk) 06:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
You're quite welcome. Vandalism Destroyer 22:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Blanking one's own talk pages isn't vandalism

WP talk page guidelines clearly state: "Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. This specifically includes both registered and anonymous users." So please stop harassing the dynamic IP 12.76.xx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.76.153.143 (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

But it is not appropriate to take warnings off of other IP talk pages, even if they are in your own IP range, because those IP addresses may be leased to somebody else. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 19:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi. I just wanted to say thanks for reverting the spam that someone posted on my talk page. It's much appreciated! - Masonpatriot 14:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. Vandalism Destroyer 22:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

You warned the user Jamespiecowye about this on his talkpage. You reverted the edit back to the full article and tagged with db-bio. The creator of the article blanked the page which makes it CSD G7, so the article should be deleted. Its useless to waste time and wait what he comes up with. I am quite sure there is nothing notable about the person. Cheers. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 09:03, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I realized that. I reverted before I noticed the similar names, and when I did, it was already reverted, so I decided to tag it with the bio tag instead of reverting my own edit. I'll take a closer look at these things when I RPP. Thank you. Vandalism Destroyer 13:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

thanks

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For reverting some jerk's vandalism to my userpage. shirulashem (talk) 02:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. My first barnstar under my new username. :D Until It Sleeps 04:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Merry christmas.

Thanks! Happy holidays to you, too. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

You're quite welcome. Until It Sleeps 22:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Fishmas from the otters and me. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 22:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Until It Sleeps 23:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

But but but...

But I like Vandalism Destroyer! Oh well, I'll get used to seeing this new name on Huggle I guess. :) Happy holidays. :) RainbowOfLight Talk 23:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hehehe. Oh well xD. Happy holidays to you too. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 19:28, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Your new username is much less aggressive... but then again it's a Metallica title isn't it? :D Anyways, hope you have a good winter holidays. I just finished my final exams earlier today.

Hi, Jameson. Yes, it should be. I would have much rather just changed my username, but this new one really sounded nice, and since the account was never used... yeah, anyways, you have a nice holiday too. And yes, it is a Metallica title... but then again so is Master of Puppets ;). Thanks for stopping by. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikilove from NL!

Afternoon VD,

Thanks and love from myself and mah boytoy Jacop. Wishing you a Merry Christmas as well, and hoping yo have a much less stressful holiday season than me! I work Christmas day after all! Enjoy the fact you don't have to sell! Hehe
Peace and Love!
NeuroLogic 19:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Ouch, that's gonna suck during christmas... Nobody will probably even come in. Happy holidays again to you too. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 19:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Heli Attack 2 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 03:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Edit conflict. :) Sorry! rootology (C)(T) 03:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

That's fine. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

More Wikilove

Great job vandal fighting!

:D Thanks Jake. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page :) Amzi (Talk To Me) 20:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

You're quite welcome Amzi. UntilItSleeps PublicPC (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Thanks Julian. UntilItSleeps PublicPC 15:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Arabic

this IP 212.107.116.240 is writing with Arabic language in this article [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucy cheung (talkcontribs) 00:35, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: Legal Threat

Rjd0060 (talk · contribs) blocked the IP for a week. Thanks for pointing that out. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 17:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

.

That stinks that you're semi-retired. Come back soon. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 14:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!!!!!!!

ray; background-color: #E6F2FF;" |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | |rowspan="2" | |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | Merry Christmas! |-

|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" |

The Thing That Should Not Be, here's hoping you're having a wonderful Christmas, and here's also hoping that all your family and friends are well. Lets all hope that the year coming will be a good one! If we've had disputes in the past, I hold no grudges, especially at such a time as this. If you don't know I am, I apologise, feel free to remove this from your page.
Come and say hi, I won't bite, I swear! It could even be good for me, you know - I'm feeling a little down at the moment with all of these snowmen giving me the cold shoulder :(
neur ho ho ho(talk) 00:14, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

|}

Merry Christmas!

Hello Until It Sleeps! I just wanted to wish you and your family a merry Christmas! May this Christmas be full of great cheer and holiday spirit. Again, merry Christmas! Ashbey 00:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

If you don't celebrate Christmas, then happy holidays!


Radin and Randi edits

Radin's work has been rebutted by the scientific community. This is established fact. The fact that he still believes in paranormal phenomena thus makes him a nutjob. Not opinion, established fact.

As for Randi, he has led us into a new era of reason. Perhaps it was inappropriate of me to label him the new messiah, but the rest of my edits should have stood.


I am sorry, but your edits appear to be disruptive, and on top of that, your username clearly violates policy. Also, please sign your posts when you post on talk pages. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 05:49, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Hi The Thing That Should Not Be, someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. Also, if it was you who created the request, you may also wish to the subscribe to the mailing list, which is used for internal discussions between the account creation team. If you use IRC, please join us on the Freenode Network, #wikipedia-en-accounts. Hope to hear from you soon! The Helpful One 11:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


Account Creation Interface

You have been approved to use the Internal Account Creation Interface! Some important notes before you get started:

  1. Abuse of the interface is not tolerated, and access can be revoked by an interface admin at a moment's notice
  2. You should ask an administrator for the "accountcreator" usergroup, which overrides the 6 account creations/day limit. However, this usergroup too can be removed by any Wiki admin at a moment's notice if abused.

Now that you have read the generic warnings, please read (or re-read if you have read it already) the tool's documentation page which includes a link to the tool's request-filling interface. If you ever need any help, I myself am an interface admin and developer, so feel free to drop me a line on my talk page if you need help, or would like a new welcome template added to the autowelcome feature!

IMPORTANT: If you did not request this account, please NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY.
--FastLizard4 (TalkIndexSign) 01:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/December 2008#Until It Sleeps. SoxBot X (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

I like how it says that right after archiving your request for account creator as not done, and leaving an edit summary saying it was done. [3] J.delanoygabsadds 16:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Rollback!? But I requested Account Creator... Until It Sleeps 21:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
It would appear the bot is malfunctioning... Stwalkerstertalk ] 21:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

A cat to ease all of your troubles
A cat to ease all of your troubles
Happy New Year!
Hey there, The Thing That Should Not Be! Happy new Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;)

Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh.

Best wishes, neuro(talk) 01:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Dear Until It Sleeps,
I just wanted to wish you and your family a happy new year, however you're celebrating it. Whether 2008 was a good year for you, or if it wasn't the greatest year, hopefully 2009 will be better. Cheers, and happy editing in 2009 :-),

 Ashbey  Ӝ  02:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Christmas was yesterday: Happy New Year!

Happy new Headcheese!-hexaChord2 06:57, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, I am irritated by calling the template i added to the page "pay-per-call" has been deleted. It was NOT an test! Greets, An irritated person 80.126.238.19 (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Coaching

I'll take a look. Also, I noticed that comment at the top of my talk page; I'm pretty sure the archival bot will get rid of it eventually. :) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, BTW. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Flagged Revs

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 07:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for you support on the flagged Revs Front   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 09:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Not Vandalizing, Please Eyeball Edits

The following edits to Wendy Northcutt are not vandalism. Several years ago a Wiki-nazi was trying to prove a negative point about the Darwin Awards and slanted the Interview section accordingly. The following edit, which is a rearrangement and minor rewording, is a more accurate reflection of the interviews cited. Also the birth date is completely unsourced, and the word "November" should be removed from the book ISBN section, to standardize the presentation.

"Interviews" section: My proposed edit (which has been twice reverted by, seemingly, a computer.)

Northcutt was interviewed by Mark Emmons of the San Jose Mercury News. Emmons states that "Northcutt considers herself a potential Darwin Award candidate. She describes herself as a klutz."

When interviewed by Salon she said "If there are multiple stupidity genes, then having one or two might make someone creative, while having a dozen would make her a dangerous idiot."

In an interview with a blogger at UK hosting company 123-reg[7], Wendy confirmed that running the Darwin Awards website now takes up all of her time. She said, “I always feel like I’m neglecting my audience, even though I work more than full time.” She also talked about how the Darwin Awards successfully made the transition from being an online publication to being an offline one. The interview mentions that publishers asked her to "remove the stories from the internet. But Wendy was adamant: 'It was a community! I could not do that. Even though it might have cost me a lot of money, I kept saying no.'”

In 2001, Northcutt was interviewed by Jamie Allen of CNN[1]. Northcutt stated, "Before (the awards became popular), we were an insular community and we could make fun of people and those people (or their families) would never find out. But as it got bigger, I realized there was more and more danger of really hurting people." Therefore she treats the subjects of her stories with compassion, and suggests that those who read her books are likely to become more careful with explosives.

Northcutt has been interviewed by CNN[1], Salon.com[2], Jeep van Carr[3], the j.ello report[4], the Spokane Spokesman-Review[5], the SJ Mercury News[6], and the 123-reg blog [7].

Re: Not Vandalizing, Please Eyeball Edits

Hello there. I have since reverted my latest reversion, and removed the warnings from your talk page. It just seemed like vandalism because of the quote "She describes herself as a klutz." Wikipedia has a policy against inserting dubious or harmful materials in biographies, but I have reviewed your sources and have now deemed the edits to be correct. Thank you for contacting me on this matter. Until It Sleeps 21:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Why did you revert? 78.147.42.94 (talk) 22:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed you recently added yourself to the list of users interested in a Utah Meetup. We're currently discussing a location to meet, so any input would be great. Useight (talk) 05:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


John Angelos

My post is not vandalism. I am putting together an entry about John Angelos, the executive VP of the Baltimore Orioles baseball team. I tried to report a false positive to cluebot, but the wiki server kept timing out. Cimat1984 (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Daryl N/Cimat1984


Hi. Please can you retract your warning here, User talk:72.40.13.101. The edit in question, this one, was actually a partial fix of the vandalism done in the previous edit by a different IP. Cheers--Jac16888 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Citations

I've added the citations. Please let me know if this is what is expected on wikipedia. ThanksSmallman12q (talk) 02:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Reverts

all i did was remove some apostrophes that shouldn't have been there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.206.231 (talk) 15:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC) thanks

hello, I think you may be just a little bit over zealous don't you, so I pushed the publish button instead of the preview button.. get a grip boy.

Warning or welcoming

Hiya, I notice you do quite a bit of RC patrole, and though I don't do that myself, I realise it's a lot like drinking from the firehose. I would like to ask you to try to see the best of faith in new editors. As an example I'd like to point you to Special:Contributions/90.219.200.237 who you reverted several times, and give vandalism warnings with every edit. The edits were not in bad faith, and therefor not vandalism. If you would have templated him/her with a welcome template, and a suggestion to take it to talk, or take the time (and I know RC patrole is fast and furious) to explain to the user what exactly is wrong with the specific edit, you could well get a better response from the user in question.

Hope this is something you can do something with. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of DiskCryptor

An article that you have been involved in editing, DiskCryptor, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DiskCryptor_(2nd_nomination). Thank you. BenFranske (talk) 05:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikimedia cloak

User page

Did you change your picture on your userpage? I thought I remembered there being a different one. Useight (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

He did. The old one is here. Cheers, — Jake Wartenberg 03:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Reddit troll

  • Someone has posted a Reddit topic making fun of you. Reddit troll. As you do not know, I am a Wiki-dissident who has experienced Wiki-edit disasters. I both laughed and felt you have the right to defend yourself. If you think the person submitting the reddit link is a clueless waste of oxygen, please submit them to hipsters. I hope I did these wiki-format links correctly. death metal maniac (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please to be forcing edit summaries in your preferences as part of your admin coaching. Kthxbai. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

LOL yes forcing edit summaries is vital to being a good administrator -- Gurch (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
They already are enabled... Why it's not forcing them I have no idea. Until It Sleeps 16:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps because you're using Huggle, which pays no attention to such silly preferences -- Gurch (talk) 16:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
No, iirc, the edit that was without a summary was done using a normal browser. Look and see. Until It Sleeps 16:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Here, have this.

Sh-weeet!

21655 ταλκ/01ҁ 20:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

ACC tool

Hi there. Just wondering as you have the account creator flag would you like to help out on the Account Creating Tool? If you already have an account then please tell me as your on wiki user name may be set incorrectly. The reason you received this message is because your name is listed here. Please get back to me on my talk page. -·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 17:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: DiageoLiam

Maybe I was a bit heavy handed, however the page is like a big fat advert for himself, and his following of awe-filled sexually confused teenagers isn't as big as he says. It's a known fact that he's gay, and I doubt Wikipedia users need a link to his agency. There are no sources for anything in the page!

79.66.6.35 (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I reviewed you.--Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 03:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Your RFA has been withdrawn

Hello, Until It Sleeps. I have withdrawn your RFA, as it has become apparent that it will not succeed and there is little more productive value in keeping it open. Please address the concerns that were raised and feel free to reapply in the future. Good luck. --Deskana (talk) 13:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User talk:MomJeans, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User talk:MomJeans is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User talk:MomJeans, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:41, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Gastrulation edit?

I know my edit was not done correctly, as I don't know how to add the box to the top to state no references are cited. If you are going to correct what I have done wrong, could you please add the box stating that there are actually no citations rather than just leaving it in the state it was before. It still needs citations! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.37.99 (talk) 13:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC) who are you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.78.179.30 (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Multiple warnings?

Hi
How come you leave editors both a level 1 and a level 2 warning for the same edit? See e.g. User talk:201.150.75.243, User talk:24.206.231.192, User talk:68.174.25.247, User talk:68.22.199.125, User talk:96.237.237.139. With User talk:24.206.231.192 there were 54 seconds between the two warnings, so it looks like a manual thing and no Huggle trouble.
Cheers, Amalthea 21:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Not stalking... just experimenting with AWB

Hey, in case you were wondering why I've been making a whole bunch of edits to stuff that may be on your watchlist, I started experimenting with the features of AWB, one of them being "User contribs (user defined number)" which I just typed your username and typed 5000. So yeah, don't get creeped out. By the way, hi! :) - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 07:19, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

My edits

My edit to the Adrian Peterson article is correct. If you click the source you will see this. It is not vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.151.245 (talk) 22:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)