User talk:The velociraptor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SIGN YOUR FUCKING POSTS![edit]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, The velociraptor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Johntex\talk 05:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Memes[edit]

I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean where is it listed on the article? I don't know anything about this. Wavy G 02:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must not have seen that. The other ones were already on the list and deleted before, but that's a new one. I didn't notice it I guess. Added it back. Wavy G 02:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:8whxf6.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:8whxf6.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:I-8549.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:I-8549.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Raptorjesus-36752.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Raptorjesus-36752.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fail. The velociraptor 06:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dawkins[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Richard Dawkins page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Michael Johnson 00:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aww Richard Dawkins is just cool man, cept for wanting to save apes, I don't get that. They're our prime guinea pigs. Tyciol 20:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super Waha Game[edit]

http://www.4chan.org/flash/superwahagame.html I got 1362 so far man. Tyciol 20:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Username[edit]

I would like to make a request that you change your username display from "Raptor Jesus" to something less offensive. Please see Wikipeida's username policy, particularly the part about using the names of religious figures as usernames, which may be offensive to some people's beliefs. Thank you. --BenC7 12:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are aware that the "Raptor Jesus" thing was meant as a joke from 4Chan's /b/ section. Personally, I think "God is dead" is more offensive than Raptor Jesus.
Until I looked at the website above, I had no idea what 4Chan even was, and the same could probably be said for most people. If I see a username that says "God is dead" then I will obviously say something about that. Jokes can be offensive too. BenC7 01:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I think 'Raptor Jesus' is funny as heck, especially in light of the Jurassic Park movies. I might have used the name myself if I had thought of it in time. Lots42 07:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AWarn.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AWarn.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 talk 05:03, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please be sure to adhere to our civility and no personal attacks policies in your edits and especially in edit summaries, which become part of the permanent record of the page. Thank you. Newyorkbrad 01:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New note[edit]

Don't leave my any bullshit when I remove the stupid "no trivia" dipshittery. Kthx. Mr. Raptor 17:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Civility and Edit Summaries[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please be sure to adhere to our civility and no personal attacks policies in your edits and especially in edit summaries, which become part of the permanent record of the page. Thank you. Snowfire51 06:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Carol Never Wore Her Safety Goggles are thoroughly unconstructive and incivil. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. We're not here to document everything in the world. That's why there are notability guidelines. —Remember the dot (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guess what, ass-face? The Carol Never Wore Her Safety Goggles poster is really important to a lot of people. You're right though, we're not here to document everything in the world, just the number of objects rammed up your forever-stuck-up ass. We're also here to document your mom. LONG LIVE CAROL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.240.92 (talk) 00:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sceptre has started to unilaterally merge the episodes together, not waiting until the poll has closed. As there is a 3:1 opinion out there that this should not occur and I do not wish to break the 3R rule I was wondering if you could help me with reverting his edits? Thanks. -- UKPhoenix79 23:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Hi,

I see that you've been asked about this before, and I'm asking you again nicely. Please keep the tone of your edits and edit summaries civil. Specifically, this was completely unacceptable.

Thank you! kmccoy (talk) 08:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The content of your edit was not the problem. The content of your edit summary was. Edit summaries like that are completely unacceptable and will result in a block, regardless of the content of the edit. Just keep things civil and there's no problem. :) Thanks! kmccoy (talk) 07:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]