User talk:Thedued

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_rule

WAZZ UP I'M THEDUED

This aggression will not stand, man.

EVERYONE PLAY NICE! IF YOU ARE MAD OR ANGRY PLEASE BE CIVIL YAH KNOW!

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See below for exemptions.

Yeah,well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Singing

first singed

Thedued (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Thedued, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thedued! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Video. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 01:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

How is adding the prounciaton unconstructive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_ruleThedued (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

I have already explained it three times to you. Once on my talk page, and twice in my edit summaries. The most important issue here is this: If you want to continue editing Wikipedia, do not ignore what others are telling you. Ignoring other editors, ignoring Wikipedia guidelines and edit warring will surely get you blocked from editing.

Now, as for the pronunciation: again, Wikipedia is not a dictionary (please read it and learn the difference) and articles should not include pronunciation of common words. That's why the pronunciation does not belong there. You are still confusing Wikipedia with Wiktionary. Two different projects with different goals. In general, when you edit an article that was created nearly 20 years ago and has been edited countless times by countless experienced Wikipedia editors, it is extremely unlikely that the article, the very first sentence, is missing something so basic that you have to add it, especially when you are clearly unfamiliar with the Wikipedia guidelines or even the purpose of Wikipedia. The most likely scenario is that the thing you want to add is not included in the article for a good reason.

Furthermore, as I already said, I strongly encourage you to read the introduction to understand how to contribute to Wikipedia. Judging from your contributions, you do not seem to have an idea how to contribute constructively. Please read the Wikipedia policies and guidelines (and cut down on the number of exclamation marks) before you continue editing. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 01:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

And one more thing. The See also section should only include links to Wikipedia articles. Again, please read at least the introduction and the relevant guidelines before you continue editing. You really do not have the slightest idea about the most basic things on Wikipedia, how to contribute anything meaningful. Continuing like this adds nothing positive to the project, it is just disruptive editing. Thanks.—J. M. (talk) 02:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Small text

Well dang... I'ma just say "v ai dey oh" then! §Thedued (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)