User talk:Theknightswhosay

Image Tagging for Image:Image-AlexRodriguezInterference.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-AlexRodriguezInterference.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The image was already on Wikipedia.Theknightswhosay 19:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Brass.gif)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brass.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 04:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nick Saban may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<br />7 [[List of SEC conference champions#Divisional champions|SEC Championship appearances] (2001, 2003,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Saban[edit]

Theknightswhosay, I reverted your recent edit at Nick Saban. It was not formatted correctly and was causing the entire infobox display improperly. As for the content you aimed to introduce, it's not standard practice to list conference championship games appearances in the infoboxes for college football coach bio articles. You may want to start a discussion about this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring/using multiple accounts[edit]

[harmful posts containing possible libel removed by Theknightswhosay (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)][reply]

Safehaven86[edit]

Safehaven86, go away and leave me alone. I consider any more lectures from you to be harassment. I have never used another account in my life. You really think only one person in the world thinks you're wrong?

Thanks for your contribution though. See here for more. Theknightswhosay (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Theknightswhosay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Theknightswhosay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Theknightswhosay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Stefan Molyneux, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RT is never to be used as a source on Wikipedia, either. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 07:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected malicious lies Theknightswhosay (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 07:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at Stefan Molyneux, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. Grayfell (talk) 08:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stefan Molyneux; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 08:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn’t reverting my edits engaging in an edit war? Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don’t like the edits, you post a request for help. Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know most editors on this page are partisan hacks who want to smear anyone with whom they disagree. Being in the minority doesn’t make someone wrong. Isn’t that what you’re claiming Molyneux says? Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It isn’t censoring content when you don’t allow someone who has never espoused white nationalism to be called a white nationalist. Opinion pieces from political opponents presented as fact aren’t encyclopedic. Theknightswhosay (talk) 08:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72h for edit-warring with a clear disregard of our sourcing policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Stefan Molyneux for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]