User talk:Thinkspank101
Welcome!
Hello, Thinkspank101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Nachna Onedei Naei, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hekerui (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nachna Onedei Naei[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nachna Onedei Naei, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- unsourced/dubious claim to notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hekerui (talk) 13:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Nachna Onedei Naei[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nachna Onedei Naei, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nachna Onedei Naei. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hekerui (talk) 10:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I listed a reason in the deletion discussion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 15:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Bizarre edit[edit]
You made a bizarre edit to Template talk:Citations missing. I reverted it because the page in question is not an India-related article on a living musician. Perhaps you intended a different page? --Thinboy00 @108, i.e. 01:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
With all due respects, your references are non-academic, non-governmental and unreliable, consisting of two blogs and a commercial site. I don't know how you figure those are "reliable references". Certainly, wikipedia considers them to be questionable sources (Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources). Your accusation of "original research" is also ludicrous, since I'm simply stating what my reliable sources plainly state. You should learn to get your facts straight. At present, I will not delete your additions just yet since as unsubstantiated as they are, there is a slim chance that they may have a grain of truth. However, once I can find sources to back my assertions I will add them and re-edit the article.
As for your reasoning on why there cannot be volcanic salts in the Himalayas, I think they are a bit flawed. While it is true that there are present no active volcanoes in the Himalayas, prior to the collision of the Indian subcontinent with Asia in geological history (Geology of India), the sea that was present there was volcanically active. This explains the presence of large salt deposits throughout the range including volcanic salts. These geologic forces are also the same ones that create these fold mountains, so there can be volcanically create salts from the regions of the Himalaya. And no, I am not confusing this with Himalayan salt. Sjschen (talk) 13:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I have already indicated to you several times already that blogs and commercial sites do not count as credible or reliable sources. This includes your so called "VERY reliable reference", which you have pushed as evidence to your position. As much as I am willing to accept that kala namak is not halite, I'm not ready to do so without sufficient evidence and I much less willing to take the word of a commercial site, especially when what is stated goes against more authoritative sources such as governmental lab documents and authored books. Since there appears to be conflicting evidence on the source of kala namak, this article should naturally state so in its present form. In short, both you and I will not remove anything until more information appear to justify making changes.
Finally, your quote by a Dr. S. K. Aggarwal is also unverifiable, if this is an actual quote please source it. As well, it would also be nice if you will stop adding more non reliable (blogs or commercial site) or unverifiable sources to the article. Sjschen (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
September 2010[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dabangg, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Managerarc[Talk] 07:11, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Sabar Koti for deletion[edit]
The article Sabar Koti is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabar Koti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:20, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Adding CN tag to well sourced info.[edit]
You have been repeatedly adding CN tag to a well referenced information over Anna Hazare article.kindly,don't repeat such edits,or i will have to ask Admins to interfere.Maverick.Mohit (talk) 18:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Kanika Kapoor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sesamevoila (talk) 18:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Chawanmushi[edit]
Hi! There is no hors d'oeuvre in Japanese cuisine. See [1]. It says "本来、日本料理には前菜というものはありません。フランス料理のように、メインになる料理が明確にある場合は、その前に食欲を増進する酒をすすめるための肴として前菜を出しますが、日本料理ではそのすべてが酒菜であり、あるいは総菜であって、いわば全部が前菜のようなものだからです。（凸版印刷株式会社 日本料理献立百科 参照）". No matter what Western books say, chawanmushi is not hors d'oeuvre. It is lol in Japan. You'd know it if you come to Japan. So please do not add the dish in the list. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 15:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Times Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bauer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dyn (company), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages EOL and Dyn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 17[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kedarnath Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 24[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Four-stroke engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuel economy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Kanika Kapoor for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kanika Kapoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanika Kapoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Thinkspank101. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Thinkspank101. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Thinkspank101. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Air pollution in Delhi[edit]
Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Air pollution in Delhi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.Dan Koehl (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Reported for vandalism[edit]
You have been reported for vandalism of pages, including my user page. Dan Koehl (talk) 20:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. November 2019[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Coconut oil, you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhDv2.0 23:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
March 2023[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Raghav Chadha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — hako9 (talk) 19:20, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, please refrain from adding new projects to the article unless they have specifically been called a part of Delhi's 9th transformation by reliable sources on Delhi's history. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source]] for saying Narendra Modi built the 9th city of Delhi; in fact, Wikipedia should not be used as a citation on Wikipedia itself in any situation. Accoring to the Wikipedia guildelines on reilable sources:
"Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Reputable tertiary sources, such as [...] encyclopedias, may be cited. However, although Wikipedia articles are tertiary sources, Wikipedia employs no systematic mechanism for fact-checking or accuracy. Thus, Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose"
For more information on why this is, please read this essay: Wikipedia is not a reliable source
As a growing city, Delhi gets a lot of infrastructure built that frequently changes its landscape (the Delhi Metro being the most prominent example) but not all such changes have been included in the traditional historiography of classifying Delhi's history into 8 separate eras. In any case, they are not relevant to the gates of Delhi themselves, since no new monumental gate is being built in the Central Vista Redevelopment Project. Kind reagrds, W. Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/c) 10:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)