User talk:Thisismyusername V

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm McGeddon. Your recent edit to the page KerPlunk (game) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 16:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, fair enough, it looks like some versions do, it just seemed a bit odd to say "yellow, red and blue predominantly" when the picture next to the paragraph clearly just showed red and yellow. --McGeddon (talk) 16:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I revert your edit then? Thisismyusername V (talk) 16:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I'd actually be tempted to cut the bit about straw colours because neither "they're red and yellow in this picture" nor "I checked Google and saw some blue straws" are reliable sources. Unless there's a review or nostalgia book that records the colours, they don't really matter. (The site being used as a reference in the article doesn't seem to actually mention the colours.) --McGeddon (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Widr (talk) 16:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pub. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Tiptoety ^talk 17:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 17:19, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]