User talk:Thoughtactivist

re: Guiatar[edit]

correct, my summary (while a bit cryptic) meant that I reverted back to the version you had edited, not that I changed .

And welcome to Wikipedia! If you'd like to learn more about editing the Wikipedia, see some of our helpful pages:

Contributing to Wikipedia, different things you can do to help and how to do them.
~~Policies and guidelines~~no, the most important one is ignore all rules, so read about the five pillars of Wikipedia instead.

Btw, please only mark edits as "minor" when they are really minor - new pages shouldn't be marked as such. Editors will see that it is relatively minor in your edit summary. -- DDerby-(talk) 02:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all that, and thanks for the welcome! Yes, i'm just feeling my way around at the moment, and have been trying to do "the right thing" as much as i can, so all advice is most appreciated! -- Thoughtactivist 03:25, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Penelope Swales for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penelope Swales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penelope Swales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]