User talk:Thqldpxm

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Green Giant. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Third Republic of South Korea without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Green Giant (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I didn't realise there was a content dispute going on. Green Giant (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Thqldpxm! Thank you for your contributions. I am Green Giant and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Green Giant (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Salvadoran Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PKM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Campaignboxes[edit]

Would you mind explaining your reasons for removing campaign boxes? I don't assume that they are all necessary but some of your deletions seem to me to be retrograde. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Battle of Kraśnik, Mongol conquests, Battle of Komarów (1914), Soviet invasion of Poland, etc. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Could you please explain why you are adding and removing infoboxes at your own discretion? You don't appear to have discussed any of this with anyone on article talk pages or user talk pages, and have not provided a single edit summary for any of your contributions. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I'd like to know why too, when some of the edits remove context.Keith-264 (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is some overlapping of the campaignboxes because they don't always keep up with new pages but suppressing them unilaterally is bound to be contradicted. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history I've added a comment here to ask for opinion.Keith-264 (talk) 11:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please check here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CAMPAIGN#CAMPAIGN regards.Keith-264 (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Campaignbox_deletions Keith-264 (talk) 22:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please talk to me about your content changes[edit]

Hello, Thqldpxm! I've been told that your English is very poor. Could you please tell me which language/s you speak so that I can find someone to translate for you? I see by your global accounts that your home page is on Korean Wikipedia, although you've also contributed to Chinese and French Wikipedia.

Please let me know as soon as possible because we, at English Wikipedia, need you to communicate with us before you continue making changes. Thank you! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will you stop removing campaign boxes from great War articles please or at least offer your reasons on the talk page. Keith-264 (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thqldpxm, your contributions to English Wikipedia have become too problematic for us to deal with. Obviously, you have reasons for your content changes (as per your response to me here), but I couldn't really understand it. For a start, every one of your changes should have an edit summary. Where the edit summary is too difficult for you to provide, you must add a comment on the article's talk page explaining what you are changing and why.

I don't doubt that you have an interest and knowledge of military history, but making major changes to articles in a language you can barely communicate in is not conducive to a project which is based on collaboration, discussion and consensus.

Please let me know what your native language is, and I'll see whether I can find an English-speaking Wikipedian who can communicate with you. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:36, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Thqldpxm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]