User talk:Throwerjasmine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Throwerjasmine, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Throwerjasmine! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Throwerjasmine, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Technology and society[edit]

Hi! Your additions to technology and society were reverted by Innisfree987 with the comment "NPOV violation; also not sufficiently clear how it's germane to topic at hand."

Looking at the addition, it looks to be written in a casual, essay-like style that doesn't really fit Wikipedia's NPOV guidelines. It's very passionately and persuasively written, but a Wikipedia article needs to be neutral in tone. The source is also a little problematic since it's an opinion piece written by a contributor to the Huffington Post rather than a staff member. The HuffPo is something that I typically avoid as a whole for sourcing because so much of it is written by contributors and as such, doesn't usually undergo the same type of editorial oversight that a regular new article written by a staff member might or like how an academic source would usually be.

I do like your writing style and your passion, so don't take this too badly - this is actually pretty common with new (and sometimes even seasoned) editors. I honestly did the same thing when I first started editing Wikipedia under my main account. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]