User talk:Thylacinus cynocephalus

Hello, Thylacinus cynocephalus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lafcadio- The Lion Who Shot Back.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lafcadio- The Lion Who Shot Back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Lafcadio-The Lion Who Shot Back.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Lafcadio-The Lion Who Shot Back.jpg, by Staeckerbot (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Lafcadio-The Lion Who Shot Back.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Lafcadio-The Lion Who Shot Back.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom and Jerry: Blast off to Mars[edit]

I deleted the article because it had very little information about the movie. Ideally it should be more like the Tom and Jerry: The Magic Ring article, and have cast and crew information, a summary, etc. If you want to re-create the article, but with some more information, that would be fine.

If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. —tregoweth (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know candidate?[edit]

Thanks for starting Vancouver Island Wolf. Have you considered proposing it as a Did you know (rules/nominations)? I would propose it myself but thought it best to leave it to you in case there is anything more you are planning to add to it within the next few days. If you prefer not to nominate it yourself, let me know and I would be pleased to do so myself. They do want articles to be around 1500 words so it would need additional content before it can be proposed. Are any of these photos or anything in this category of use? --KenWalker | Talk 04:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bionicboogerboy1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bionicboogerboy1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bionicboogerboy2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bionicboogerboy2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Naughtycafeterialadies.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Naughtycafeterialadies.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VancouverZooLogo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:VancouverZooLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Purplepottypeople.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Purplepottypeople.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Silly Book[edit]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article The Silly Book, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The_Silly_Book.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_Silly_Book.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 02:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Cephalopholis Boenak.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cephalopholis Boenak.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:OregonSpottedFrog.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:OregonSpottedFrog.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll[edit]

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pianist may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

A '''pianist''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|p|iː|ə|n|ɨ|s|t}} {{respell|PEE|ə-nist}}, ({{IPAc-en|'|p|j|æ|n|ɨ|s|t}} {{respell|PYAN|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Younis Edwan[edit]

The article Younis Edwan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 10:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll[edit]

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Purplepottypeople.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Purplepottypeople.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Thylacinus cynocephalus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sherwoodparkwithtiger copy.jpg[edit]

The file File:Sherwoodparkwithtiger copy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rana pretiosa.jpg[edit]

The file File:Rana pretiosa.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roadrunner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lesser roadrunner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Santa Ana

Maned wolf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Regurgitation

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Tallest man ever" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tallest man ever. Since you had some involvement with the Tallest man ever redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horned puffin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crevice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pint[edit]

Mind, fire, dice, thrice, bite. I agree there may not be a word ending in "-int" that rhymes with "pint"; but that's not so strange - english pronunciation is dead weird. MrDemeanour (talk) 14:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Straight-tusked elephant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Woolly rhinoceros, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Undercoat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Woolly rhinoceros[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Woolly rhinoceros you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Woolly rhinoceros[edit]

The article Woolly rhinoceros you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Woolly rhinoceros for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Woolly rhinoceros[edit]

The article Woolly rhinoceros you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Woolly rhinoceros for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 02:22, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Hobbit (2003 video game)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Hobbit (2003 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Danielyng -- Danielyng (talk) 20:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Hobbit (2003 video game)[edit]

The article The Hobbit (2003 video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Hobbit (2003 video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thylacinus cynocephalus: Hi, this is a reminder about this GAN. Alexandra IDV tried to do some of the points I raised in the review, but they've say they can't do any more due to lack of knowledge. Can you get to this? --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:19, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Hobbit (2003 video game)[edit]

The article The Hobbit (2003 video game) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Hobbit (2003 video game) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"- -" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect - - has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 14 § - - until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]