User talk:Tibikus
Welcome![edit]
Hi Tibikus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 23:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
O nota[edit]
Buna! Draga Tibi, o nota! Stadioanele la ora actuala nu se mai clasifica in stele, ci in 4 categorii [[UEFA stadium categories ]]. E usor de obtinut categoria de top. De aceea, daca spui despre un stadion ca are 1, 2 sau 3 stele, e ca si cum ai adauga o categorie din burta. Totusi, la cele 4/4 am lasat pentru ca oricum sunt arene de top, si la Viitorul am lasat 3/4 intrucat ei nu au minim 8,500 de locuri. Dar la restul am sters pentru ca sunt niste caracterizari proprii. Pur si simplu s-a schmbat. Rostadia2012 (talk) 16:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Salut! Multumesc de sugestie, am sters rating-ul de 3 stele si de la stadionul Dan Paltinisanu si de la cel al Viitorului. Am folosit aceasta notare pentru a marca faptul ca un stadion se afla in Categoria a 3-a UEFA. Stadioanele aveau diferite sisteme de notare si am vrut pur si simplu sa fac un sistem omogen. Dupa ce mi-ai scris mi-am dat seama ca am gresit, deoarece am vazut ca nici stadioanele mari ale europei de categoria a 3-a (de exemplu Anfield) nu au aceasta notare. Tibikus (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nu trebuie neaparat sa le stergi, oricum este clar ca stadionul din Ovidiu nu se poate incadra la categoria a 4-a, avand doar 4500 de locuri in loc de minimum 8500. Ce a fost de sters am sters eu, de exemplul Stadionul CFR nu stim sigur unde se incadreaza. La cele noi si peste 8500 de locuri le poti pune 4/4, cum este de exemplu Stadionul UTA sau cel din Targu Jiu. Celui din Ploiesti la fel. Pentru ca au toate facilitatile si sunt si acoperite. Rostadia2012 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
The article Wyverin Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Primarily advertising. Company has insufficient coverage to be notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elliot Talk to me 21:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Dear Elliot,
though I appreciate your concern and advice, I am going to try and defend my article that you proposed for deletion. I will address your points and express my point of view:
Firstly you labeled my article as advertising. As you know, Romanian software companies and game developers are pretty much under-represented on Wikipedia, which would make any contribution (especially about companies with news media coverage) pretty valuable. In the community guidelines it says that it is frowned upon to advertise your own business. I am not associated in any way with Wyverin Entertainment, other than the fact that I play their games. I am not trying to sell a product, I am just trying to write objectively about their games which I (a 3rd party) mostly played.
Regarding the notability, please note that there are 4 news articles listed in the references, from 3 different cities in Romania: Sibiu, Suceava and Arad. In my opinion, this shows that the company had nation-wide coverage in respective cities local news. Furthermore, independent international articles were written about their games. I also need not mention that this company occupies the first 2 pages when googling their name.
In conclusion, although this company is not Microsoft, they have had enough coverage and they have collaborated with enough well-known people (as stated in my wikipedia article) to earn them a place in the (already poorly represented) Romanian video game developers category of Wikipedia, hence I shall remove the proposed deletion notice.
Kind regards, Tibikus (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
I think that's a fair defense. I've created an RfD discussion as some other editors I've spoken to couldn't agree on whether this article meets notability guidelines. I didn't actually see your response on your talk page but I will give it a read when I wake up in the morning and re-review the sources. I would recommend moving some of the inline external links because they're not necessary. If it survives AfD, I'll try and spend some time helping you to clean up the article. Elliot Talk to me 00:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your understanding. I edited the external links and some of the text in order to make the article more objective. I might have gone overboard a bit, probably because I’m currently the 1st ranked players worldwide on one of their games, but I truly want to make this an objective article. I hope it survives AfD. Tibikus (talk) 07:17, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Wyverin Entertainment for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wyverin Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wyverin Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elliot Talk to me 00:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of football stadiums in Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadionul Steaua. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |