User talk:Tide rolls/Archive 43

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Brian Haner

Listen here kid,

Brian Haner said we had permission to change his page. Stop changing it.

Sincerely,

Brian Haner Fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.253.70 (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

No. Tiderolls 01:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

History of psychology

Hey Tide rolls,

I see you have left me a warning template of level 1, here. Though I did not make any such edit, I think my internet provider has a dynamic I.P. address. I however, do have a Wikipedia account, i.e. Debastein and was wondering if there were any templates which denoted dynamic I.P. addresses. Regards, 14.96.164.188 (talk) 07:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

I almost forgot; if you did not make the edit, then the message was not meant for you. A technicality, but an important one. Tiderolls 11:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Harassment

Dear Tiderolls,

I wish someone were as much on the ball as you as per the constant downgrading of the Eringer page I put much time and effort into, which is regularly targeted and on which I no longer seem to be able to reverse or undo the edits from my harasser. Wiki refereed once in January and when I alerted them again this month, I was told nothing could be done. Hence right now the deletion of the butchery that has become my page. This Peppernox user also targeted another of my pages. I'm sick of it, personally. The error is not with you but in the absence of a mechanism to remove trolls. Your action of reversing my blanking only reinforces the bullying I'm receiving for stupidly contributing to Wikipedia.

Lozange — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lozange (talk • contribs) 19:44, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Lozange, please do not surrender to your frustration. I will be more than happy to add this article to my watchlist if that will help. I simply need you to understand that the policies and guidelines of this project are put in place to, ultimately, help the reader. A blank page does the reader no service. Hang around and help...we need it. Regards Tiderolls 19:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You're too quick at reverting vandalism, everytime I go to do it you beat me to it :) Ceradon talkcontribs 19:54, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Meh..I get there first, you get there first...as long as we get there:) Thanks for the recognition and your help on recent changes. See ya round Tiderolls 20:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me :P

Hello, Sorry, I forgot :P It's been a while since I've been back. Please can you tell "Rahmatgee" not to accuse everyone of conspiring against him. I was only giving a suggestion. Some people are just a bit rude... nevermind! Sorry for rambling! Thanks, FairHelp (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

In some circles editing the user page of a collegue is considered rude. I wouldn't have reverted you at all, but Rahmatgee had done so previously. Tiderolls 22:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

I completely understand, thank you for your help! Hope you have a great day,
FairHelp (talk) 17:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

reply

the genre of that page on the right side — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beggsie221 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

I want to change the genre of the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_Let_Me_Get_Me --Beggsie221 (talk) 23:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

OK. First, this conversation belongs on the article talk page. That's why I left you a talkback linking to that page. We can talk here or we can talk there; the way you dart about I have no idea where to answer. I'll try here first. I know where the "genre" field is; my question is what source do you want to use to support your change? Regards Tiderolls 23:57, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

dangerously in love

sorry about that

dangerously in love

sorry i've been ignoring i still a bit stuck 124.149.117.224 (talk) 04:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

You're also logged out. Tiderolls 04:37, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Reply

I am not editing frequently like I used to do, only once in a while. Recently, I only made like two new edits. So you're telling me that's against the rules too? 68.194.58.106 (talk) 19:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

I simply asked a question. You do understand that the block of User:NYCSlover applies you as an individual...right? Tiderolls 19:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Ummm...yeah, I know that. Which is why I only edit once at a time not frequently anymore like before! Do I look retarded to you?! 68.194.58.106 (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

As long as you know. You will understand, then, your next block if you continue to evade your block. Regards Tiderolls 19:49, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

The Jonathan Ross Show (Help!)

Hi, basically an ip you threatened to block on 6 March, has now come back and has completely ruined The Jonathan Ross Show page by making lots of edits, most if not all of which contain made up information. Due to the amount of edits I was wondering if you could do a roll back? Kind regards, Mythical Curse :(talk) 09:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC).

Hi, Mythical Curse. I've restored the article to its previous state. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Tiderolls 09:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

ANI

Mount Epperly edit

Hi Tide Rolls.

I made this edit in the Mount Epperly article, a edit you reverted. As I clearly stated in the Edit Summary, I corrected the elevation per reference (The same reference used in the article). Please, be careful when you revert the editions made by anonymous users, you can scare away people interest in helping Wikipedia. 190.25.108.104 (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Ups, I just saw your new message. 190.25.108.104 (talk) 19:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes, my revert was made in good faith; as was your initial edit. It appears we're both human. That's good news from my stand point. Tiderolls 19:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Again, I just saw the new message. Well, the more you know... thanks for the new references and the updated info, and sorry for the mess. 190.25.108.104 (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for all the work that you do to revert vandalism on Wikipedia! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for this recognition, Electriccatfish2. Anything you can do to help us would be appreciated. Tiderolls 22:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

sorry

this was by mistake sorry Soufray (talk) 00:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

AJ Benza at Best Buy

Would a personnel roster from Best Buy constitute a valid source? Obviously his employment there is not published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.218.223 (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Obviously. Tiderolls 01:36, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Admin review comment

Hi Tide rolls, thank you for your comment on my admin review over a year ago. :) I have recently closed it and want to thank the participants. I am honored that I was an influence in your early days here...that's means a lot to me. Best. Acalamari 09:49, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

User:174.252.189.137

Just left this on my talk page "The World Tomorrow is a registered trademark and copyright of The World Tomorrow Evangelistic Association. By legal agreement, the producer's of the Julian Assange program of the same title, changed the title to "The Julian Assange Show" as of episode 2. (Please take a moment to properly educate yourself about articles you wish to edit prior to making future Wikipedia edits, or use the sandbox). Any cursory search, (YouTube) will verify the Assange program name change simply by viewing the intro to the show. The page needs corrected to reflect this updated and ACCURATE information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.189.137 (talk) 01:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)". I was going to say see your comments on his talk page. Do you think that it is enough explanation? Dan653 (talk) 01:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

The article may very well need to be changed. YouTube is not a reliable source. I am conerned with the IP's behavior not the validity of their position. Tiderolls 01:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

The World Tomorrow

WATCH the SHOW! It's called "The Julian Assange Show"

The World Tomorrow is a registered trademark and copyright of The World Tomorrow Evangelistic Association. By legal agreement, the producer's of the Julian Assange program of the same title, changed the title to "The Julian Assange Show" as of episode 2. (Please take a moment to properly educate yourself about articles you wish to edit prior to making future Wikipedia edits, or use the sandbox). Any cursory search, (YouTube) will verify the Assange program name change simply by viewing the intro to the show. The page needs corrected to reflect this updated and ACCURATE information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.189.137 (talk) 01:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.189.137 (talk)

Edit warring

Stop and understand you are guilty of edit warring and making changes to an article that you are unwilling to simply take a moment and educate yourself about. Have you ever even WATCHED the show? The program was changed from being called The World Tomorrow, to The Julian Assange Show, as of the SECOND episode. The Julian Assange Show is now in its SIXTH week! WATCH the show's intro. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.252.189.137 (talk) 01:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Irrelevant. Tiderolls 01:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Attorney for Assange and Russia Today Television

Peter D. Vogl Jones Day 222 E. 41st Street New York, New York 10017-6702 Telephone: (212) 326-3659 Facsimile: (212) 755-7306 E-Mail: pdvogl@jonesday.com

Please feel free to contact the aforementioned attorney, or be sure to tune in to Tuesday's episode of "The Julian Assange Show", (previously titled "The World Tomorrow" during it's inaugural episode).

Irrelevant, part 2. Tiderolls 02:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
The episode that I'm seeing still has the same title. ref discussion.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 02:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
He has left a link which lends some support for his position. There appear to be two different title versions. I'll leave a note on the article talk page.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 03:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Berean Hunter. Since I consider myself involved already, I'll most likely weigh in there as well. Nice celtic crosses, BTW. Tiderolls 03:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Cheers
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 03:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Help!

Can you help me sort out a mess? Per this discussion, Walter Hill (filmmaker) needs to be moved back to Walter Hill (director). Unfortunately, attempting to make that move, I inadvertently moved the page to Walter Hill (direct), a consequence of listening to loud music and typing faster than I was thinking. Meh. Can you help me sort this out? I either need more coffee or more whiskey, I am trying to find the correct balance for late-night editing. Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 02:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I suck at page moves. I'll message some smart folks, though. Tiderolls 02:02, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Well, apparently, that makes two of us. Thanks for calling in the cavalry. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 02:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Gentlemen, I think I took care of it--it wasn't as complicated as it could have been, though it is entirely possible that I misunderstood. Moved (direct) to (director), deleted (direct), redirected (filmmaker) to (director). Correct? Drmies (talk) 02:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
I've been promoted to "gentleman". My life's work is now complete. Tiderolls 02:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Jacobite, you owe me something distilled from a mash that uses one particular malted grain. Tide, it's never complete. Drmies (talk) 02:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Done and done. Glenfiddich or Glemnorangie? ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 02:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes, thanks! Drmies (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
No dram as a finder's fee? :^/ Tiderolls 02:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Drmies might give you a wee splash. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 03:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

continual harassment

You should remember me, putting warning messages in my page for signing posts, when I dd etc. Then I blocked an ip for deleting the education bit on horace Mann, week here's the proof of it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Horace_Mann&oldid=492246723. (FishingKing, fighting to keep Wikipedia factual. (talk) 08:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC))

What harassment? You do not have the ability to block users on this site. Tiderolls 13:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I think the user may mean that they reported the IP and the the IP was blocked by an admin. --Chip123456 (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Chip. Actually, FishingKing thought they blocked the IP. Tiderolls 18:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Well, I've never seen that before! Obviously they don't know how the blocking system works and who can block who. --Chip123456 (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tide Rolls, I have left a note on FishingKings talk page about their 'blocking'. Also, I was shocked that they had been granted rollback rights after only starting on the 7th if May....this year! Kind Regards --Chip123456 (talk) 19:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out, Chip. I was surprised as well, but rollback can be removed as easily as it's handed out so there's not much real danger with that permission. FishingKing's contributions have been helpful for the most part; I'm just wanting to see more clue exhibited. That may come with time. Tiderolls 19:36, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
No problem. It all takes time. I have also seen your posting on my talk page, obviously the user didn't acknowledge your comment and just removed it. And as for the RB rights, again its baffling. When I was given them after 4 months, an admin told me I took them thirteen and were shocked, just wait until I tell them that this editor was given them after 6 days! Although, as you said, to be fair to the editor has mostly made constructive contributions! Also, I know I haven't had too many encounters with you, I was wondering if you could comment on My editor review, if it's not too much trouble? Thanks, --Chip123456 (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. (FishingKing, fighting to keep Wikipedia factual. (talk) 08:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)) FishingKing, fighting to keep Wikipedia factual. (talk) 08:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

What attack? Tiderolls 13:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Sorry FishingKing, but have to agree with TR here. I think maybe he/she was only trying to give you advice. --Chip123456 (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Fishing King

OK I get you, just leave me alone — Preceding unsigned comment added by FishingKing (talk • contribs) 13:47, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't think you do get me, but time will tell. You should read Wiki. You'll see that we are a community; so leaving someone alone doesn't really dovetail with our philosophy. Tiderolls 13:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for watching out for my talk page :D Dan653 (talk) 00:33, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

My Walter Mitty Page Edit

Hey Tide rolls,

Sorry about the confusion, Mike Myers was replaced by Ben Stiller to star in the upcoming Walter Mitty film and that's why I made the change. I probably should have explained the edit but I was in a hurry. My fault. 69.134.110.165 (talk) 01:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Cedar Point: island or peninsula

Conventional wisdom is that Cedar Point is located on a peninsula rather than an island, but if you look closely at satellite images you will see that the two thin strips of land connecting the "peninsula" to the mainland are each broken by a short bridge. If a bridge prevents an island from being an island, I suggest we rename Long Island as Long Peninsula.

Go to Google Maps to see what I mean. I don't mean to be combative, I would actually like a second opinion, haha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.57.6.128 (talk) 01:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

No worries, I don't take your message as being combative. There may be sources that support a move of the page as you suggest. If you want to take a look for the sources and post to the article's talk page, I'll watchlist the page and help any way I can. Thanks for coming here to discuss the situation. Tiderolls 02:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

User:188.116.243.214 and User:Joyson Prabhu

Yesterday night/eariler tonight you reverted an edit by User:188.116.243.214 after they blanked a redirect at Ciro Cirillo. They re-blanked and then about 15 minutes later User:Joyson Prabhu requested speedy deletion (via A3) for the page. Normally this wouldn't be a huge issue, but they are the same person (as per the note on the IP's userpage). I didn't see the note and asked Joyson Prabhu why he deleted a note I left on the IP's talk page. Immediately after he replyed to me, Joyson Prabhu retired (or at least posted the templates for it).

This is making me question if we caught a sockpuppet account, if this was the straw to break the camels back, or something else entirely and if this is something that should be looked into further. Any thoughts you may have would be appreciated. Thanks, Michael Greiner 06:03, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Need some assistance

Can you or another admin way in here? This guy (scroll down to the bottom of the page) will not stop reverting sourced content edits for a band named Behemoth wherein sources cite them as a blackened death metal band, but instead he keeps reverting everyone that reverts his edit to the original version of where it said "blackened death metal" to his revisions over and over for the band's discography. So technically he's not only edit warring with users, but also removing sourced content from the site. He's been on Wikipedia for quite a while, so I can't template him or be suggestive on other things that I would normally do if this was a new user doing this, but keep in mind these actions are not right. • GunMetal Angel 06:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, GunMetal Angel. Strictly speaking, at this I would only be able to involve myself in this situation editorially. No administrative action is required...yet. Going to TheSickBehemoth's user talk is not a bad idea, but you two should begin a discussion on the article talk so the issue will be more visible to other interested editors. One thing, you say you are reverting to sourced content. I don't see the genre directly sourced; it may be and I'm missing it. Neither of you has techically broken 3RR yet, but if the genre reversions continue without some type of consensus being determined there could be problems. I'll post a message on the article talk. Thanks for your message. Tiderolls 07:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Look at his talk page, negotiating with this person is impossible. I have already 1) stated what he's doing in not right 2) just now directly listed sources stating the band is of that genre 3) told him months ago not to do this and yet he still does it 4) he will always revert this sourced content and call it "incorrect information" which is some pretty big bullshit. • GunMetal Angel 07:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
That's the importance of consensus. Once there is consensus then changes cannot be made without sources (which would alter consensus). There are other processes in existance for dispute resolution, but talk page discussion must be attempted before the others can be pursued. Tiderolls 07:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Please help clarify an issue

When you deleted Henley High School, South Australia last year, the disambiguation page for Henley High School became more or less a one item page. A new user has attempted to request Henley High School (Klamath Falls, Oregon) be moved to the title without disambiguation and frankly it seems to have merit. Please advise me of your regards to this matter, and if you concur, effect the move on behalf of User:DU2010OR. Thank you for considering this and I look forward to seeing your counsel. My76Strat (talk) 09:06, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Now the dab page is needed. I suck at moves so I chose to create the article instead. I also find article creation a challenge, but it's easier than article moves. Anyway, User:DU2010OR can now move on to more pressing concnerns. Thanks for the heads up Tiderolls 17:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Because you surprised me with an outstanding answer, I felt compelled to design a barnstar for you, that may rightfully remain a "one of" award. If there is ever another of Crimson class, It requires your designation; for you own the realm. AFAIAC.

This barnstar distinguishes
a Wikipedia administrator of Crimson class.
Hearken these and know; User:Tide rolls is one
Observe his deeds of May 20, 2012
when the full measure was shown.

for far exceeding my high expectations! - My76Strat (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
A purely biased opinion; that's phreaking beautiful. I dunno, though...an award for basically being too lazy to learn how to move pages?:) Thanks, My76Strat, for the challenge and the recognition. See ya 'round Tiderolls 20:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Class Avesta should be blocked

I think he should be blocked by one of us on the basis of his edits today at House of Wisdom, both because of the restriction on his editing without a mentor and because he insists that it is the same as the Academy of Gondishapur despite the fact that it clearly isn't, eg our article on Gondishapur, [1] and [2]. Dougweller (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm not opposed to a block. I sometimes overcompensate in the AGF department to overcome a certian amount of cynicism that comes with advancing age. The user did show a bit of resistance to my suggestion but did not decline directly. Maybe more input from those involved would be a good idea? Tiderolls 18:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Gotta go, back in 2 hours. Dougweller (talk) 18:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm watching, take your time. Tiderolls 18:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
You beat me to it. Good call. Dougweller (talk) 20:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for blocking Madara66666. It was vandalism only, and I have come in contact with several vandalism-only accounts that end with repeating numbers. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Hi, Electriccatish2. Thanks for the recognition. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:08, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Help with Colonia del Valle article

Hello, I'm sorry to bother, but I would like to request some assistance with Colonia del Valle neighborhood article. I accidentally violated the 3 revert rule in one of my last edits, and had to revert back to the previous edition of the article. An editor has removed cited material. Thank you. -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Talk  00:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Marco. I've left a message on the user's talk page. Thank you for your self revert and exhibiting restraint in your attempts at article maintenance. I know it can be frustrating at times, but remember that you can always seek help. I apologize for my late response, but when I'm watching recent changes I may be overly distracted by other tasks. See ya 'round. Tiderolls 02:12, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the response, and I apologize for the late reply. The editor is very passionate about the subject, and I hope that in a matter of time (s)he will become acquainted with the project's policies. Thank you and regards. -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Talk  17:31, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
I've posted a message on the article's talk page. Regards Tiderolls 17:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
I replied to your comment in Colonia del Valle's talk page to draw the editor's attention. Yet once again, he/she made a revert to the article by removing four maintenance tags and seven cited references, and adding a mixture of poorly-written peacock claims and pictures of buildings that are not located within the neighborhood. It's truly getting tiring to put up with this, and I think the editor is using proxies to change his/her IPs based on the pattern of contribution to the page by IPs per my reply. Thank you and regards. -- Marco Guzman, Jr  Talk  21:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Curious

A cretin with nothing better to do than create sock accounts, disrupt WP:CRIC, attack its members, vandalise its articles, and evade his permanent ban. Thats my deal with that individual. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Huggle

Hey, haven't noticed you on huggle in a while, good to see a familiar face... Busy day! Petiatil »Talk 19:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Petiatil. Yes, the older I get the more breaks I require. Alas. See ya Tiderolls 19:54, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hello!

Just logging in quickly to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Guess that's what I get for all the admining trying to keep the encyclopedia clean!--5 albert square (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, 5 albert square. You just keep on paying attention to the important stuff; leave the routine maintenance to us grunts :) See ya 'round Tiderolls 21:30, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Mr Smith Bot

Thanks for you message on my talk page. I've replied there. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tide_rolls/Archive_43&oldid=1147948340"