User talk:Tik tok tik tok

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm JNW. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JNW (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aidan Chippendale with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 16:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Saratoga, New York with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli ^Talk 16:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JNW (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tik tok tik tok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Are you sure? Please check again at Paul Blart: Mall Cop and see whether it was I vandalising or the reverting party

Decline reason:

As below. Kuru (talk) 16:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This edit was vandalism after the final warning. —C.Fred (talk) 16:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org.

AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]