User talk:Timo313

Fair use rationale for File:Greg evans.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Greg evans.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Greg evans2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Greg evans2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:TTilford 240x320.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TTilford 240x320.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Oltl07170921.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Oltl07170921.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:SEdmonds 240x320.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SEdmonds 240x320.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SEdmonds 240x320.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SEdmonds 240x320.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oltl07170921.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oltl07170921.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Greg evans.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greg evans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Shenell Edmonds, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 17:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Talk:Shenell Edmonds constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 18:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator[edit]

Due to "certain reasons" by a "certain someone" I am unable to create a short bio for an actress. it would be wonderful if I could have some help, or at least a step in the right direction as to why it was deleted twice. thank youTimo313 (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only pages you have created were files that you uploaded -- all non-free images that were uploaded with invalid fair use rationale. I assume you must be referring to your edits at Shenell Edmonds? If so, that was deleted because if you read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenell Edmonds, you'll see it was decided to redirect the page. Your edits did not fix the problem that caused it to be redirects: lack of third party, reliable sources. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 22:07, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

first of all, let me just clear this up. I named every source I got my information from none more, none less. so......?

The article does not have enough reliable sources to show notability, however. It needs to be shown that this actress has significant coverage in outside sources. The sources you have added are roughly equivalent to the sources that existed on the page (here)when the decision was made to redirect the page. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 22:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had enough for one to go back see that every source on that page were directly from my sources. not a piece of info on that page exaggerated

That's not the concern here, I'm trying to be clear about that. You need more sources to show that the actress is notable. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 23:03, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well thats funny, because I took a look at the bio on kelley missal which fell through the cracks. now I have read the notification qualifications, and I copied the bio I create on to my computer and I'am looking at it now. that bio had just as many source as mine. that bio itself was also similar. with that said I'm sure you should have no problem explaining to me how this managed to happen.

Thank you for pointing it out, because that's exactly what it did: fall through the cracks. I've redirected that article as well. I'm not entirely sure why you were using an article with a template showing that it had questionable notability as your example, though. So no, I've had no problem explaining to you. I'm going to lay this out clearly one last time:

The article on Shenell Edmonds was redirected through a deletion discussion which can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenell Edmonds, if you would like to review it.
The article had three sources at the time of this discussion: an "official biography", an IMDb page, and an ABC bio.
The article you've written has three sources: the same official biography, a biography of the character she plays (not even the actress herself), and a two-sentence long biography.

So, to explain once again why this your article does not merit inclusion, it does not fit the notability criteria for entertainers. A breakdown of why not:

Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. From what I can glean from your article, she has had one significant role in this television show.
Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. No mention of this in the article, and no sources that can back this up.
Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Again, no mention of this in the article, nor any sources to back it up. I think if this were true there would be more sources around.

Furthermore, the article does not fit the basic rule: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."

If you still don't understand, you are more than welcome to post a request for deletion review.— GorillaWarfare ^talk 20:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sedmonds 240x320.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sedmonds 240x320.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:DestinyEvans.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:DestinyEvans.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]