User talk:TimySmidge

Hello, everyone. Welcome to my talk page. To leave a comment, click here

Hello, self[edit]

Hi, myself. How are you doing? I have just told everyone that we are fans of Harry Potter. Good-bye. --TimySmidge

{{Original version}}[edit]

I've nominated template {{Original version}} for deletion. It isn't used anywhere, and the previous version said, 'This article has been edited so much, it is advised that is returns to its previous and/or original version.' This isn't really a good precedent to set -- article changes like this should be discussed on a talk page, not with a template at the top of an article. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 21:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's alright. I was new when I made that anyway. No one needs it. --TimySmidge 21:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)TimySmidge[reply]

Your recent RfA[edit]

I'm sorry, but I've closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you've only got 215 edits on Wikipedia; while edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards that they judge RfA candidates by, there was no chance that the RfA was going to pass.

I'm sorry about this, and hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I'm confident that you could possibly run a successful RfA in the future. You may want to consider submitting yourself to Wikipedia:Editor review for feedback on where to get some good experience, and when you're ready for RfA again, there's a great Wikipedia:Admin coaching program for you to use, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname[edit]

Indeed I do recognise you. You can call me Requiem, Bell or a combination of the two. Happy editing! Therequiembellishere 21:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I much prefer "there". Call him "there". He'll love it. As his sister, I know.

Minervamoon 16:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah, shut up! Therequiembellishere 18:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made went on Disney's Haunted Mansion ride a little before I made my account, and they have a line in the song along the lines of, "Do you hear the ring of the requiem bell?" (A requiem mass is a funeral mass and the church bell is heavily used), and I was in a huge emo phase, liked it and it stuck. I really like the edits you make, and rarely are they wrong. And no, I'm not an admin, but I cause a lot of controversy, idk if people would like me ;-). Therequiembellishere 00:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol, I like those too. Therequiembellishere 20:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use, categories, and inter wiki-links[edit]

I have removed all fair use images on your user sub pages, see WP:F. Note that you may use user sub pages to work on an article but bear in mind that non-free images, non-related categories, and non-related inter wiki-links are not allowed on user related pages. Thanks, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article archives[edit]

Just to let you know, Wikipedia:User page#Copies of other pages shows that you're not allowed to create those for personal use. You should probably use {{db-author}} to delete them. If not, I'll place them up on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion in a few days. TTN 21:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of notes[edit]

Do not remove the link to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TimySmidge from Wikipedia:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies/T again. I'm sorry if you're disappointed in the outcome of the RfA, but that's not a valid reason to remove it from an archival page like that (the fact that it was restored after the first time you removed it should have been the necessary notification that you shouldn't remove it; since that didn't work out, I'm telling you directly).
You've currently got several Dragon Ball Z articles in your userspace. If you're working on them to make substantial improvements to the main namespace articles, that's great, but you can't have non-free content in the user namespace. Just leave them commented out, please. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pages deleted[edit]

I've deleted all the Dragon Ball Z subpages in your userspace. You didn't appear to actually be working on them much at all, and only had them there to keep a "personal preference" version around, which isn't something you're allowed to do with your userspace. If I have deleted the pages in error, just let me know and I can restore them. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pages restored[edit]

I have restored the following pages:

Remember, the terms of the undeletion are that you wouldn't restore the Fair Use images and that you'll actually work on them for the exclusive purpose to then improve the main articles, and that you'd actually work on them, rather than letting them sit around. Ideally, you'd coordinate your efforts with members of the Dragon Ball task force. EVula // talk // ☯ // 19:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exuse me but I am part of the Dragon Ball task force and I have to say that you cannot have fair use images on your user name related pages. Simply changing the name to "Extended" does not let you use fair use images. Those characters already have articles. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 12:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More on Fair Use images[edit]

I've already told you that you can't use Fair Use images anywhere other than the main article namespace. This includes pages in the Wikipedia namespace, such as Wikipedia:Wikiproject Cartoons/Userbox/User VeggieTales fan. I've removed the image from the userbox. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two notes[edit]

1. You recently moved several of the articles discussed above into the main article namespace. Sorry, but that's not allowed; you can't copy and paste content into a new article, as it is a violation of the GFDL policy about all edits being attributable to their authors. You can copy and paste your versions back into the original articles, where the edits will be considered by their merits. (I don't know enough about the topic to make sound judgement calls on the content).

2. As per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/TimySmidge, I've blocked all your socks. Please don't use multiple accounts just for fun. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gakusha 21:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts as its apparent in you logs [1]. - Caribbean~H.Q. 03:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've extended the block to indefinite. I'm tired of dealing with this, and I (and everyone else) have better things to do than appease your appetite for attention. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay[edit]

PEOPLE OF WIKIPEDIA! I'M SORRY FOR MY ANNOYANCE! PLEASE UNBLOCK ME! I'LL NEVER DO IT AGAIN! PLEASE! --TimySmidge 20:59, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TimySmidge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I learned my lesson! Please unblock me

Decline reason:

Clearly not, see User talk:TimmySmidge. — Yamla 20:41, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I promise that if I am unblocked, I will go back to my old ways of just editing artiles, and not talking to users. --TimySmidge 20:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TimySmidge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise that if I am unblocked, I will go back to my old ways of just editing artiles, and not talking to users.

Decline reason:

No, we've had enough nonsense from this and other accounts of yours. Please follow the instruction, "Do not replace this message with another unblock request or add another unblock request." If there are more, we'll just protect your talk page so you can't edit it.— chaser - t 22:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How about this[edit]

Kinda like how in Dragon Ball Goku got one day out of heaven, can I have one day out of being blocked? Tomorrow's good.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TimySmidge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

see above

Decline reason:

Sigh. Do not replace this message with another unblock request or add another unblock request. Declined, and talk page protected. WODUP ^(?) 23:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"The Delinquent Road Hazzards" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Delinquent Road Hazzards and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 14#The Delinquent Road Hazzards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 19:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]