User talk:Tinylittlecomet

May 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm XRENEGADEx. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Suzi Gardner, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! xRENEGADEx 02:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 02:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And here's the kicker; even if you could find high-quality reliable sources that verified the gossip you're looking to add, it would still be trivial gossip and inappropriate to include in a encyclopedic biography.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 02:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It’s verifiable via publicly available sources and it’s a fact. Where’s the gossip? Tinylittlecomet (talk) 02:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no way that you carefully read all of the information in the links to our policies linked above between when they were provided to you and when you replied. And if you did read them and that's your reponse, you didn't comprehend them.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 02:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatevs, dude. Censorship is alive and well. I’ve offered a way for you to verify the information, which is a FACT, for yourself, but you choose not to. Nothing in the k formation I added is untrue or unverifiable as the source I used comes directly from the parties mentioned. Tinylittlecomet (talk) 04:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]