User talk:Tito4000

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome!

Hello Tito4000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Cleared as filed. 17:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hi again. I noticed your addition to the Johns Hopkins University article, about the med school. Unfortunately, we can't just add copyrighted text to Wikipedia articles, and your submission comes right out of http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/som/mission.html. I'm going to have to remove it from the article as a copyright violation. You might also want to read our policy on copyrights here: Wikipedia:Copyrights. However, feel free to add a section on the medical school that uses the Hopkins web page as a source without copying it verbatim. Thanks! —Cleared as filed. 17:41, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Hi Cleared as filed. Thank you for the warm welcome. I apologize for the inclusion of copyrighted material. I'm glad you deleted it. I have since updated my contribution to that article using my own description.--Tito4000 13:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. No problem about the copyright material; you'll find that other editors will fix up any mistakes you make quickly, so keep on editing, and don't worry about breaking anything! —Cleared as filed. 13:44, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

glycolysis[edit]

Those edits look OK. I'll check out the reference that you posted to read about the overexpressed hexokinase. If we have both views there will definitely be no POV preference. David D. (Talk) 06:26, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edits on the page. One edit I do question is whether fermentation can produce energy. I thought fermentation referred to the reactions from pyruvate to lactate, for example. Are you using the term to include glucose to lactate? I'm not actually sure which is correct.

The more I look at the article I realise that it really needs to be reorganised. It does not flow to well at the moment. It seems the followup section should be later in the article. David D. (Talk) 16:39, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I should have done my research before I posted. It is clear that fermentation includes glycolysis. Thats what happens when you edit off the top of your head. thanks for catching that error. David D. (Talk) 16:42, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Date formatting[edit]

Hi Tito4000! I have noticed that some of your recent edits to dates at the War of the Pacific article remove the existing formatting and links. Please keep in mind that, according to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style,

Adding square brackets "[[DATE]]" to full dates allows date preferences to work. Editors are not required to link full dates, but most full dates in Wikipedia are linked so that each user's date-formatting preference appears in the text.

Likewise, if the formatting is removed, individual user preferences will no longer work on that text. Additionally, other Wikipedia guidelines recommend that full dates (i.e. at least day, month) be linked. Perhaps you can help us track and link the full dates, while de-linking plain years as suggested? Cheers, and welcome, TopQuark 09:47, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TopQuark, Thank you for the welcome, and for the advice on date formatting. I'll keep it in mind. For the record, in certain parts of the article the format 2005-11-17 was being used, and my intention was just to change the format into 17 November 2005. However, I inadvertently ended up destroying the links. I'll watch my fingers next time. --Tito4000 15:33, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tito4000. I see why you would want to change these, I personally prefer the format you describe. However, the dates were already displaying on my screen in that format, which leads me to believe that your preferences settings may be involved. Note that the following code:

[[2005-11-17]] - [[17 November]] [[2005]] - [[November 17]], [[2005]]

results in:

2005-11-17 - 17 November 2005 - November 17, 2005

and what I see is:

17 November 2005 - 17 November 2005 - 17 November 2005

What do you see? That format is defined by your date and time preferences setting.

Cheers! TopQuark 16:02, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TopQuark. Well, what I see is

   2005-11-17 - 2005-11-17 - 2005-11-17

which is what prompted me to do the edits. The funny thing is that these were only two dates (out of many) showing under that format. At any rate, I thank you for your explanation and I'll play around with my computer's date and time preferences setting. --Tito4000 00:23, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dickens[edit]

Please refrain from making any further edits like this one: [1]. UK English is perfectly ok in an article about a British writer. Thanks. --Guinnog 05:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Guinnog, OK, we can leave it in the U.K. English form, if it so disturbs you otherwise. However, it's my humble understanding that U.S. English is the standard for this version of Wikipedia. --Tito4000 23:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If this were the case, then a lot of us users of British English would move out! === Vernon White (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC

As Dave Souza pointed out on my talk page, your humble understanding is wrong. The relevant policy page is Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. Edits like the one you made are specifically forbidden. Best wishes, --Guinnog 04:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Guinnog, Vernon, and Dave: Touché! I yield to your well referenced explanation. I'm sorry for the humble misunderstanding on my part. As Guinnog correctly pointed out, my editing was in fact specifically out of line. And Vernon, please don't move out! I promise I won't let my hand do that again when I'm on edition mode. Sorry folks, no harm meant. Happy holidays! --Tito4000 19:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tito for your understanding. We all make mistakes; I still make 'em after 25k edits! Best wishes, --Guinnog 21:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal Peru and Wikiproject Peru[edit]

Hello, I've seen your contributions to Peruvian-related articles and thought you might be interested in seeing Portal:Peru and Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru. Anyway, bye and happy editting.--Jersey Devil 20:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Devil. Thank you for the info. I've just added my name to the list of contributors to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru. --Tito4000 03:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ColegioBiologosPeru.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ColegioBiologosPeru.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BetacommandBot. I inserted the required information. Please let me know if I can be of further help. --Tito4000 (talk) 03:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Logoupch.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logoupch.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ErnestoBustamante1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:ErnestoBustamante1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 03:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC) Hi MBisanz: I emailed the required information as per your instructions, and WP acknowledged receipt. Please let me know if I can be of further help. Thanks.[reply]

File source problem with File:Marianobustam.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Marianobustam.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Tito4000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logoupch.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logoupch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 20:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ErnestoBustamante.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ErnestoBustamante.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ErnestoBustamante20070130-2b.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ErnestoBustamante20070130-2b.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ErnestoBustamante20070130-2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ErnestoBustamante20070130-2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]