User talk:Tjmccrae

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tjmccrae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 18:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Motion (Calvin Harris album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| title1 =[[Composite Objects]"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 15:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ultraviolence (album), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Littlecarmen (talk) 15:51, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Pinkprint. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Listen (David Guetta album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 26 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Listen (David Guetta album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| note18 = featuring Sam Martin) ([[Robin Schulz]] Remix

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tjmccrae, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Tjmccrae! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1989 (Taylor Swift album). IPadPerson (talk) 16:48, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruption by adding material that is not backed up by a reliable source. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to While(1 Is Less Than 2) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 17:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Pinkprint. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.Jacona (talk) 17:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Listen[edit]

Hello,

I actually can't see this tracklist on iTunes, could you give me a link or a screenshot? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperStitchieux (talk • contribs) 15:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Turgan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Listen (David Guetta album), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Turgan ^Talk 17:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, do you have a source for your full tracklisting or reciepts of some sort to confirm the Nicki Minaj and John Legend feature, you seem to have given it a time aswell, thank you 95.175.150.39 (talk) 05:34, 11 October 2014 (UTC) surfbortx[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Listen (David Guetta album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Tjmccrae. You have new messages at Talk:Listen (David Guetta album).
Message added 16:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Richard Yin (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would appreciate if you would respond to the concerns raised at that talk page. --Richard Yin (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to explain your edits to the Listen article[edit]

Your recent editing history at Listen (David Guetta album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 18:58, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even though it's been more than 24 hours, you still appear to be reverting without discussion. Please provide an explanation for this edit so we can understand your motives. If you don't explain it, and if you re-add the material after any other user removes it, you may find yourself blocked for edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Pinkprint may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 3 "[]"s and 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued edit-warring and insertion of unsourced information. Any admin can unblock when this editor agrees to provide reliable sources for added information and acknowledges that he must not edit-war such information into articles.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 18:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you to ban me anyway? What exactly did I do to deserve this..? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjmccrae (talk • contribs)

What did you do? You repeatedly ([1] [2] [3]) added a disputed and unsourced tracklist to The Pinkprint and refused to discuss the edits. —C.Fred (talk) 22:35, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dude I didn't do anything.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjmccrae (talk • contribs)

You added unsourced material as indicated in the diffs above. Please explain why you added the material if you want any hope of being unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 00:09, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I will no longer post any unsourced material nor will post nonsense on pages. Please unblock me.

Unblock[edit]

I didn't do anything somebody unblock me please?.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjmccrae (talk • contribs)

Yes, you did. See the section above. —C.Fred (talk) 00:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please