User talk:Tm266

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tm266, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adam Dahlberg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tm266[edit]

Hello Tm266,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged User:Tm266 for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 00:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carl Azuz[edit]

The article Carl Azuz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. McGeddon (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue[edit]

Hello, I'm sorry but the Carl Azuz article isn't right for Wikipedia. This is because it copies Mr. Azuz's biography on CNN, which we can't use. For the article to be kept, you need to replace it with your own text, just simply summarising Mr. Azuz's career. (You don't need to include every fact in the article, most of which aren't that important.) In addition, you need to cite sources (perhaps both his profile and things like interviews) using the cite tool. Any questions let me know, but this has to be done soon or the article will just get removed. Blythwood (talk) 21:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carl Azuz[edit]

Hello Tm266,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carl Azuz for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: McJuggerNuggets (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralizationsAreBad was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:McJuggerNuggets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GAB^gab 22:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tm266, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GAB^gab 22:50, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Totten Intermediate School 34[edit]

The article Totten Intermediate School 34 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Elementary and Junior High schools are rarely notable enough to be included into Wikipedia. Something bad happened, school is old or an other outside influence are generally the reasons for inclusion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:McJuggerNuggets[edit]

Draft:McJuggerNuggets, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:McJuggerNuggets and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:McJuggerNuggets during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Hello, Tm266! I just wanted to give you a friendly caution: do not insert political commentary into Wikipedia, as you recently did at Hillary Clinton [1] and as you did earlier at Chuck Schumer.[2] This kind of activity is regarded as vandalism, and people who make a habit of it can wind up getting blocked from editing. I can see that most of your contributions here are constructive, so please keep doing the good stuff, and don't get yourself into trouble by vandalizing articles. Thanks. MelanieN (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Los Angeles Lakers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 02:51, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Academic titles[edit]

Please read MOS:DOCTOR and follow the guidelines there. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:49, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this alert notice carefully[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 09:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Miami Marlins. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EricEnfermero (Talk) 15:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hillary Clinton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 23:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page Matt Harvey appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]