User talk:Tnxman307/Archive 21
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Yes, the account was requested on #wikipedia-en-unblock and we were aware of the connection - he asked for an unblock first - it should be noted in the account creation log. User:MuZemike and I discussed it extensively and decided that we were in a bit of a pinch because User:Daniel Case told the user on-wiki to create a new account here while an autoblock (and an account creation block) was in effect and then User:GorillaWarfare told him to stop asking for unblocks that "you've been advised of how to proceed from here" with this edit, again suggesting the recourse was to create a new account. It was also problematic that GorillaWarfare included a warning that continued requests would result in talk page editing being revoked but it was then revoked in the next edit by Daniel Case. If the user really had a compromised account then a new account is the right thing to do. If he is crying wolf, then he will do so again and will get blocked - or he won't in which case it won't matter. He got a stern warning against any funny business this time around. It looks like MuZemike may not have lifted the autoblock though, which is going to pose a bit of a problem for the user. BTW, what was the "block evasion" cited as reason #2 in the original block? --Doug.(talk • contribs) 21:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. It does sound like there were some crossed wires there. This person has had accounts blocked before, mainly just childish vandalism stuff. I agree with the stern warning as well. This should really be their last chance. Thanks again for taking a look and if there are issues with the user, just let me know. TNXMan 22:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Block evasion by VKFP
I believe this may be a sockpuppet of the user VoteKlakForPresident (talk · contribs) according to what the former's user page suggests.--Tærkast (Communicate) 13:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Nice catch. I've cleaned up some other accounts, Acroterion nabbed VKFP. TNXMan 14:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- No probs. I started an SPI page, but feel sort of useless now since it's over. Plus it's my first SPI opened, I didn't really know what to expect or do. The SPI page. can probably be closed.--Tærkast (Communicate) 14:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Wonder if you could spare a moment to cast you eye over the contributions of Mrs Delyth Evans (talk · contribs). I have a suspicion that it may be another sock of Crouch, Swale (talk · contribs) but I'd appreciate a second opinion before blocking and I know you are familiar with the background. Thanks in advance, nancy 10:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- There have been a lot more edits this afternoon which have now completely convinced me that it is Crouch so I've blocked as a suspected sock. Best, nancy 16:03, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Sock
Hey, you've confirmed many socks here but none was blocked and now there are several new socks (Lastly n Fastly (talk · contribs), Antishsh (talk · contribs)) who keep vandalising, edit warring and harrassing me on my talk page. Can you help me please? Shahid • Talk2me 16:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, he is twisting the facts. He is a biased extremist Indian who is not leting names of Pakistani playback singers to be included in Playback singer wikipedia and giving false and unsourced height to Lata Mangeshkar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lastly n Fastly (talk • contribs) 16:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Blocked and tagged. Thanks for catching this. TNXMan 16:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- \\sigh// Dady iz here (talk · contribs)... Shahid • Talk2me 16:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
edits on BITS Goa page
Hi there. Before editing out material, please give the reasons for doing so on the talk page. Your feverish pace of editing during the last few days (when i was away from Wikipedia) has distorted the article completely. I appreciate your efforts to maintain the quality of wikipedia articles; but please list the edits that you want on the talk page, so that either I can undertake them, or can give the reasons why I consider them unnecessary. Please note that I put in a great amount of precious time in sourcing the material and naming the article look aesthetic etc. and if you do want to edit it yourself, please maintain the integrity of the article. Your actions, I am afraid to say, greatly discourages new editors like myself from contributing any further. PratikMallya Talk! 07:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but the material you've added hasn't been reliably sourced, that is, sourced to an independent third-party source. Wikipedia is not a place to promote the college or act as a brochure for the school. TNXMan 15:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- I understand you, and if you see my edits, you will know that I have wanted to do the same. However, please understand that this is India; coverage of University campuses is very low and hard to find; it took me a long time to nail down the description of the campus which you seem to edit out every time. It is actually a fact; the statistics are correct regarding the built areas and buildings. If you would like, i can edit out the parts which are overtly praise the campus. I again humbly request you to please not keep editing out material without discussing on the talk page; be polite enough to request the changes from editors who have worked on the article for long; I am sure that we can come to a common ground. PratikMallya Talk! 20:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
User talk:Summer Vacation
I had revolked talk page access, but hit an edit conflict with the decline reason where I was going to mention it. As you only gave a warning re: not continuing to abuse the unblock template while I was going to state it was revoked - I wanted to discuss with you. If you feel he should be given one more chance, feel free to restore talk page access. But, the prior two decline reasons had given the same warning, so I was feeling that it was time to enforce their stated intent to retire and to no longer edit Wikipedia. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:16, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Creating an alternate account
Hello, this is regarding an alternate account I want to create, as I edit from shared computers in College, and the computers are usually not secure. As I notice that you are a CU, I want to notify you before I create an account. I will create it once you give a go ahead. Regards, Yes Michael? •Talk 08:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) You don't need permission. Go ahead and create it. Just make sure the user page is clearly labelled as an alternate account of User:MikeLynch and there should be no problems! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thought it'd be better if I asked first. Don't want problems later :) Thanks! Yes Michael? •Talk 08:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Undue attempt to out user
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Babasalichai Pls read the part where they attempt to out a user and use very personal language and insults. Pls assist. Babasalichai (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see anything that resembles outing. Is there a specific statement with which you are concerned? TNXMan 17:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Review of blocked user
Hi Tnxman. Thanks for your help with the AbhisheksinghWIKI checkuser. If you have time, could you stop by User talk:AbhisheksinghWIKI#March 2011 and comment on the latest input from other users? Thanks. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 19:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing that out. I thought I had the page on my watchlist - I'll comment there. TNXMan 19:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oops. I can see that it was already taken care of. Sorry about that. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 19:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Holos Global System
What is wrong nel'articolo I quote "Holos Global System "? Because I was deleted? "Holos Global System is a program of concrete initiatives, not about a promotional or advertising activities, given its complexity, I thought it was right to publish it on wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romagu (talk • contribs) 16:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but the article did not indicate why the group was notable enough to warrant an article. I would encourage you to read our guide to writing your first article, as that may assist you. TNXMan 17:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Why my comment today has been canceled? Romagu 17:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, TNXMan. I had a look at this and some similar articles after seeing the EL added by User:Zonestash, whom you recently blocked. I'm out of my depth here, but it looks to me like some of the warez-related articles are full of ELs to sites with download links to pirated software. I think the article may be being used not merely to describe practices but to promulgate information about how and where to obtain illegal downloads. The article "sources" appear to be principally warez and warez-enthusiast sites themselves. Even where the links don't violate WP:ELNEVER, the sources are sub-RS, to put it mildly. But to be frank, I'm completely at sea on this topic, so I can't really judge what I'm seeing when I follow an EL like this. Would you have a second to have a look and confirm or allay my suspicions before I go off at half-cock? -- Rrburke (talk) 02:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would attack the article with a hacksaw (of course, I usually do that anyway). There's a lot of unsourced information, original research, and, as you point out, badly sourced information. I've cut the external links as well. Thanks for catching this. TNXMan 11:29, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Request to review an SPI
Hello. Per new information provided, I was inquiring if you would consider taking another look at the SPI against Bugapi? Thanks! Strikerforce (talk) 12:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, there's nothing more really that the checkuser tool can tell me beyond what I've posted already. You may want to ask DeltaQuad or HelloAnnyong (both SPI clerks) to review the case. TNXMan 13:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will do that. Strikerforce (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Signature
I have a question about your signature,how do you get it do have different colors,and links to your user page,talk page,and your contributions? DarkfireII13 (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- Never mind i copied your signature,fixed it to something I like.thanks. DarkFireII13 17:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Q. re. sleepers, please see [1]. Thanks, Chzz ► 17:54, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletions
--Vermapriya1986 (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)please help me one of user is deleting everything form the page Govind Kuamr Singh , he has deleted all contents , informations , formats , he has changed article .Please help me to solve this problem .--Vermapriya1986 (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of .. Music (Model for Urban Stormwater Improvement Conceptualisation)
Hi, When I put may page together I intentionally modelled it on ISIS Modelling Software as what I was writing about is a parallel piece of software. Presumably there is a subtle difference in the 'style' of the pages that makes mine not pass scrutiny. Is it possible to have my page moved back to my user-space, so I can edit it further and have it reviewed and approved before publishing again? Thanks, saintsixtus (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC) Derekhawley
- I've restored the page to User:Derekhawley/Sandbox. I would encourage you to read our guide to writing your first article and especially our information on reliable sourcing. TNXMan 12:47, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks saintsixtus (talk) 15:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Military Vehicle Trust
I have just added an article on "Military Vehicle Trust" and it has immiediately been deleted as a copyright infringement of the Background page of the MVT website.
I am the Military Vehicle Trust webmaster. How do we put an article on which will say almost the same as the website if we are trying to say what the MVT is about?
Regards
Nigel Hubert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12mvt8611 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello
I have just read WP:WWMPD and have asked for a second opinion. I'm think that ShoutWiki deserves an article, but I'm new here and my previous Wiki experience was only Uncyclopedia, so I fail to write a proper article that's actually about something. All I'm saying is that you should put ShoutWiki as a requested article, if you have some sort of "Wikipedia:Requested Articles" thing, or similar. （・∀・） - Another n00b (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC).
- I'm sorry, but the article did not indicate why the website was notable enough to warrant inclusion. I would encourage you to read our guide to writing your first article or possibly this page, where you can request articles. TNXMan 17:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh, ok Thanks. ( ﾟдﾟ) - Another n00b (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Abandoned Toys
I don't think the page for Abandoned Toys article should have been deleted. I get A7 but they are artists of interest and have conributed new ideas to Neoclassical music that users should be able to learn about.
89.243.239.222 (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Dyslexic Speedreaders
````is there anyway in wikipedia those who want to see what was in it can even though we hadnt contributed in it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.191.123.67 (talk) 00:48, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Have you tried clicking on the history tab at the top of articles? That may show you what you want. TNXMan 14:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
A Comedy of Terrors
Thank you kindly for reifying Firelion's Diagnostic Model of WMF as a Baletocratic Ochlocracy. That was very helpful. —Caprice 15:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
A Comedy of Terrors
Thank you kindly for reifying Firelion's Diagnostic Model of WMF as a Baletocratic Ochlocracy. That was most helpful. —Caprice 15:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caprice Barry (talk • contribs)
Vandalism
Many thanks! Ian Cairns (talk) 20:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm inclined to grant Tugboat123's unblock request; do you mind? Nyttend (talk) 14:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- If Tugboat123 is unblocked, I would think Paganchristmas would need to be blocked. Basically, the person needs to settle on which account they would like to use. I warned Paganchristmas to limit themselves to one account - if they would like to use Tugboat123, that's fine with me. Let me know if there's anything else with which I can help. TNXMan 15:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Dude
Why dude, I worked really hard at spreading the message of Wet Scrotitus and you now probably have it. you need some peanut Butter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwazwas (talk • contribs) 17:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Blocking the sandwich guy
Thanks for getting around to that one. The block was in purest good faith, but I can see how the appearance might suggest otherwise. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:26, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- I trust your motives. :) I did, however, go with the softerblock instead of the spamublock. Let me know if more issues come up. TNXMan 18:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- He's got a very long history of COI, pro-company edits; so I'd say that the spamblock was more
inappropriate. I'm keeping away from the article he edits, so let me know how it turns out. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)- I'll give you 16:1 odds that new user User:Shazaam25 is 1983 under a new name. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- I've asked the million dollar question. TNXMan 18:51, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'll give you 16:1 odds that new user User:Shazaam25 is 1983 under a new name. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- He's got a very long history of COI, pro-company edits; so I'd say that the spamblock was more
Hi
Hi:Sorry for the omission. This was my first try, so was caught unaware of the set-up. Will keep in mind next time. Thnx:Rafi188.222.7.234 (talk) 14:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Undoing My Autoblock
Thanks for the quick turn around; at first I kept staring at the page "wait, is Corbin Bernsen a protected article? That doesn't make sense!" Cheers. mordicai. (talk) 18:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. You may want to let whomever controls the Macmillan account that Wikipedia does not accept advertising in that fashion. TNXMan 19:11, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
My user talk page
After an 18 month hiatus I have now returned (and you're thinking, "er, and who exactly are you?" - I know I know, noone noticed :P). As per this I think it's probably safe to unprotect my talk page - at least I should certainly hope so! I'm going to be editing a bit more regularly so I'd like anons to be able to get in touch :) C.U.T.K.D T | C 22:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Range block extension
Hi,
On Feb 15, sockmaster sinsen was indef blocked after creating a sockfarm and you blocked two /20 ip ranges for a month. After the blocks expired he came back, started yet another sock Konguproud (talk · contribs). SpacemanSpiff blocked the account and now he is editing logged out as an IP. Today he left me this message saying he wont stop. Can you reblock the ranges? (Spiff adviced me to ask you as you are the original blocking admin)--Sodabottle (talk) 16:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- That appears to be their only account at the moment. I didn't see enough activity to re-implement the original blocks, but I've taken a less drastic step to discourage him. If more activity does occur, please let me know or re-file the SPI case. TNXMan 17:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- thanks!. will keep an eye on the range --Sodabottle (talk) 06:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
He has created another id Transnivas (talk · contribs) and has started editing again. --Sodabottle (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Blocked and tagged. TNXMan 15:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks!--Sodabottle (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Removing JlHawkins blacklist entry
Seems like this filter is hitting often for an old sock, I'm gonna remove it. -- DQ (t) (e) 15:36, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Green dragon98
Hey. Over on there, you listed User:Facts facts facts, which isn't an account. And are you positive about Bjorn Martiz on there? Seems like a false positive to me. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Just to let you know that this blocked editor is denying that he used the same computer as the IP vandal, and is contesting the evidence that he was, over at User talk:Swe41 - don't know if you might want to add anything -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Replied there, thanks. TNXMan 17:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Great, thanks -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of "Eve's Fund for Native American Health Initiatives"
Hi!
I just noticed today that the page "Eve's Fund for Native American Health Initiatives" was deleted by you on March 31 at 14:25.
This was my first attempt at writing a Wikipedia page, and I tried to model it after other non-profit pages that are currently on Wikipedia.
I made sure to include several media references that backed up the information I wrote on the page. I also thought I used very neutral language.
Can you please let me know if there is a possibility of getting this page re-instated with some edits on my part?
I am very much confused by the "Wikipedia World" and spent many hours reading and learning before attempting my first page.
I want to learn if you can just tell me in layman's terms what part of my article was not written correctly.
Please let me know if there's any way I can get my page back up.
Thank you, RIPublisher (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Just following up on my note above...any chance I can get my page back? I'm happy to make changes...I didn't think I wrote the page in a "promotional" way....let me know--thanks!
RIPublisher (talk) 13:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) From an outside perspective, I would suggest that one of the biggest concerns is WP:COI - a userid called "RIPublisher" and another one called "Eves Fund" both edited this page - as such, the promotional nature of the article was well-established. Please note that although noble, very few non-profit entities meet the notability requirements of Wikipedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Bwilkins (talkpage stalker). Thank you for your comment. I understand that a userid "Eves Fund" tried to edit my page, but I don't understand why it had to be deleted because of that. Couldn't they just inform "EvesFund" that they aren't allowed to edit a page with the same name as their userid? Also, I did not write my page in a promotional way (in my opinion) and used outside sources to meet the "notability" requirements.
I am hoping that I will here from the administrator who deleted the page without any warning. Isn't there a way to get it reinstated and then ask editors for help fixing it to make it better? RIPublisher (talk) 14:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Some things, such as notability, must be established from the very beginning. I think I left you a whack of links on your talkpage. You would do well to understand them. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:15, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
"Wonderland (Natalia Kills Song)"
Hello Tnxman307, Why was the page "Wonderland (Natalia Kills Song)" deleted? I contributed a great deal to it. I was just wondering. Thanks! scout661 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scout661 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- It was deleted as part of a purge of articles created by a banned user. If you'd like, I can restore the article to a sandbox for you and you can move it back to the mainspace. Just let me know! TNXMan 11:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
User:DEPEDRX.ph and User:보통의 are socks/meats of User:Jonasorg. They have been sleepers for several weeks, and I've been just waiting for this to crop up again when they thought the coast was clear. Identical edits to Puerto National High School. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jonasorg/Archive. I'll leave you to block please because I only got the mop recently and I'm new at this. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Eve's Fund for Native American Health Initiatives
I am Eve's mom, in whose memory Eve's Fund is named. I have just found the notes written by other editors and can clearly understand now, how it must have seemed like my attempted edit on the page was "promotional." It certainly was not intended to be however. Although I use Wikipedia almost everyday, I had never tried to post a comment and quite frankly didn't realize "anyone could do it". When I saw that anyone could add content to the page, I attempted to add a link to a "notable" event that we had supported. As soon as I got the message, after the fact, that anyone representing an organization should not be adding comments, I logged off. I respectfully ask for your reconsideration of your decision to remove the Eve's Fund page. Why? It was a honest mistake, by a 65 year old mother, who is doing " "noble" and notable" things everyday for Native American children, who have often been neglected and forgotten. What could be more worthy of attention, then the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation having recognized a, yes, small non-profit organization by giving us a "Quality of Life" grant for our efforts in prevention education. If we have saved one life because a young Navajo child will no longer get in a car without using a seat belt, or won't ride a bicycle without a helmet, we will have accomplished something noteworthy. I apologize for my ignorance and my mistake–it will not happen again. I ask again for a reversal of the decision to remove the Eve's Fund page from this fine resource page. Thank you for the great "volunteer" work you do everyday. --Eves Mom (talk) 12:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)--Eves Mom (talk) 12:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Superbly back?
I noticed that you did the check on Superbly here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SuperblySpiffingPerson/Archive
There is a user on the 2011 Libyan civil war article, Transitionrenewal, who seems to make very much the same points and has the same behavior. Just notifying.
-- Avanu (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Well, coincidentally right after I notified you, Alison blocked that user. So its confirmed already. -- Avanu (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I was late getting back to you. If more issues arise, please let me know. TNXMan 15:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
unblock of 69.228.199.187 (talk · contribs) on hold
You're usually a pretty solid admin in the blocking department, so this one has me puzzled. Their last edits before being blocked haven't been reverted and do not appear to have been vandalism. They received no warnings whatsoever and no notification of the block. Is there something else going on here? Beeblebrox (talk) 03:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- It took me a moment to investigate, but I figured it out. That IP is one used by a serial vandal, so I put the kibosh on them for a couple of weeks. I rechecked just now and it's pretty certain it's the same person. I freaked out for a second, I couldn't remember this one! Thanks for looking into it and if there is more I can do, please let me know. TNXMan 15:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- I figured it must be something like that. Thanks for the response. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:59, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Checkuser's Barnstar | |
| I guess we have one of these now, so you're the first to get it. Thank you for all the hard work you do - it's seriously appreciated. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks
Thanks for lifting my autoblock :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crossfire101 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. You seem to have the misfortune of sharing an IP with a vandal. TNXMan 16:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sent you an e-mail. Courcelles 18:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Cupertino
Regarding this block, in your opinion is a month the right duration? Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- It could even be longer, but I think a month is a good start. Cheers! TNXMan 18:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Blocking of Eve's Fund for Native American Health Initiatives
Haven't heard anything from you regarding my request to unblock Eve's Fund for Native American Health Initiatives page. There are thousands and thousands of non-profits and individuals working with non-profits, being written about here and I don't understand why we are being penalized because I tried to add a new link for my first time ever contribution. Hope you will reconsider. Thank you. --Eves Mom (talk) 11:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but your article was deleted because it was advertising for the company. If you'd like, I can restore the article to a sandbox for you where you can improve it before moving it to the mainspace. I would also encourage you to read our information on writing your first article and writing from a neutral point of view. TNXMan 11:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, that sounds like a good resolution. Would appreciate you doing that.--Eves Mom (talk) 06:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)