User talk:Tobias382

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice article![edit]

Hey, nice article on WBS!

I was a bit too young to use it during its heyday, but both of my parents were exectives for the company. I remember a lot of corporate history details (such as the many name changes the company went through in its early years), and a few other things from hanging out at the office after school. Remember the breadcam?

I'll contribute to the article as soon as I have time. Thanks for starting it!

-Fadookie Talk 16:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WBS Article[edit]

In the time since the WBS article was speedy deleted and recreated I figured out that the proper way to take care of it should have been to have an admin restore the article to preserve all of its previous edits; since I recreated the article after it was deleted all of the previous edits are not accessible to non-admin users and it looks like I created the article. If you get in touch with an admin he or she should be able to advise the best way to take care of it and restore the previous edits and fix the problem. This might be helpful. There haven't been many edits since the article was restored so it shouldn't be difficult to take care of.

What actually happened to the article at the time was that one editor added a lot of content about one of the recreated WBS sites, making it look like a "true" successor or recreated WBS. Another editor took exception to it and in the ensuing argument one editor made a legal threat and was banned; the banning administrator put the article up for deletion here. During the deletion debate another admin found a site that had copied the Wikipedia article and incorrectly though the article was taken from the other website, deleting the article as a copyvio. When I asked the admin that deleted the article about it that admin suggested that I simply recreate the article[1]. Narthring (talkcontribs) 22:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contributing to Wikimedia tech[edit]

Hi, Tobias382. I noticed from your edits and user page that you're interested in programming. I thought you might want to know that the Wikimedia open source community welcomes you to get developer access so you can contribute code, critique others' commits, and generally get a better sense of how this place works on a technical level.

Also, the Wikimedia Foundation is hiring programmers, in case you know anyone who's looking. Remote work is often feasible.

Best, Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager (talk) 06:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tobias382. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wbs2.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wbs2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Manifestation (talk) 07:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WebChat Broadcasting System logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:WebChat Broadcasting System logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]