User talk:Tobiasi0

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tobiasi0! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Zai talk 18:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletions[edit]

I have declined several of your speedy deletion requests for redirects because they did not specify a valid speedy deletion criteria. Please read and understand those criteria before making adding any more speedy deletion tags. If you feel the redirects need to be deleted, you should nominate them at WP:RFD. -- Whpq (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Immune system[edit]

Hi, I have reverted the tag you put on the article. Please see MOS:LEADCITE. Graham Beards (talk) 21:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham Beards got it, thank you for the information. Tobiasi0 (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parkinson’s disease[edit]

I noticed that you have edited the page Parkinson’s disease recently; however, it looks like most of those edits do not comply to our sourcing guidelines (e.g. Review articles published in 5-10 years) for biomedical content. Please slow down your edit and discuss on the article’s talk page first. Thanks. --Dustfreeworld (talk) 20:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice, I will keep an eye on the source dates. –Tobias (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding to the biomedical context, I made sure that the information I inserted were up to date. That doesn't account for all signs and symptoms, as basic understanding hasn't changed in the near past which I made sure as well before rewriting the section. So there shouldn't be any sources explaining biomechanical mechanisms that are older than five years, let alone "most of those edits". –Tobias (talk) 20:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Angelman syndrome[edit]

Hello, thanks for your edit there; I've had to fix it to more closely line up with the sources. Please be careful with this. Graham87 (talk) 03:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might be worth doing something like that in the cause section of that article too, so that the lead summarises the article, not the other way around. Graham87 (talk) 03:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually maybe not ... Graham87 (talk) 03:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham87 that are quite a lot of changed decisions not to mention your edit history there, so what exactly is your plan? :D –Tobias (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah :-) ... I'm removing the microdeletion bit because it can be more than 5Mb, but keeping your removal of the alternative name. Graham87 (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham87 to get this right: do you mean 5 MBit? –Tobias (talk) 07:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just got this ... yep, that's what I meant. Graham87 (talk) 12:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm drawing a blank - how do 5MBit correlate with my edit? –Tobias (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]