User talk:Tomsmith81727
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. El_C 06:50, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019[edit]
Somebody wants to hide some history very much.... But no way!
Your recent editing history at Jewish Ghetto Police shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019 again[edit]
You need to engage on the talk page of the article rather than continually reverting. You can find it at Talk:Jewish Ghetto Police. Not discussing does not help your situation - you need to gain consensus for your edits rather than WP:Edit warring. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jewish Ghetto Police shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Tomsmith81727 - an account solely for reverting?. Jayjg (talk) 12:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Indefinite block[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 17:12, 30 May 2019 (UTC)