User talk:Tony199

Welcome!

Hello, Tony199, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Riight.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Valley2city^‽ 23:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Riight.com[edit]

A tag has been placed on Riight.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Valley2city^‽ 23:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Riight.com[edit]

A tag has been placed on Riight.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 04:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

riight.com[edit]

I moved your question to my talk page from the archives, where I think you accidentally posted it. It was deleted, because Wikipedia has notability guidelines, which riight.com, as it stood, did not meet. Info.com, on the other hand, was covered in multiple reliable sources, as illustrated in its References section. I hope this clears up some confusion. Thanks, hmwith τ 18:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Copa Airlines, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Copa Airlines was changed by Tony199 (u) (t) deleting 15890 characters on 2010-04-27T22:57:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Riight[edit]

A tag has been placed on Riight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mark nutley (talk) 22:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Riight[edit]

A tag has been placed on Riight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mark nutley (talk) 22:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tony, this just isn't the place …[edit]

to promote a business (Riight) or complain about an airline( Copa Airlines).

I think maybe things are starting off awkwardly for you here.

Please take a few minutes to read the following:

What Wikipedia is Not, especially the "Not a Soapbox" section
Conflict of Interest Guideline
Notability Guideline for Organizations
Spam Guideline
Business FAQ

Regards, --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you about the above. I am not trying to blatantly promote Riight.com, but we are getting more traffic and users everyday, and have wanted to put a Wikipedia page up for over year. With our increase in users, we thought it was the right time to do that.

With regard to Copa Airlines, I am not trying to complain, but am trying to get the attention of someone at their company who can help me remedy the situation they have caused. It seems to be working, as I believe they are finally, after 3 months, going to refund what they have promised.

I do apologize for soapboxing my issue with Copa, but I felt it would help managers at the company respond to my emails and phone calls.

Tony199 (talk)Tony

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User:Shimeru. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Ojay123 ^{(Talk•E-Mail•Contribs•Sandbox)(Respond on my talk page!} 01:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from attacking other contributors, as you did with this edit to User:Shimeru. Continued personal attacks may lead to being blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Thank you. Ojay123 ^{(Talk•E-Mail•Contribs•Sandbox)(Respond on my talk page!} 01:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Riight.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Riight.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your question about Riight[edit]

In order to create an encyclopedic, non-advertisement article, there are a couple of Wikipedia policies and guidelines to consider -- but I'll boil it down to two principles for you.

First, it should be written in a neutral tone, with the intent to inform (and not to promote). This means refraining from marketing language and covering the subject in a balanced manner, including criticisms where they can be reliably documented. Neutral point of view describes most of the fundamentals.

Second, it must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject itself. This satisfies notability. Basically, things like newspaper or magazine articles about the site, television interviews regarding it, reviews in trade publications, mention in books -- anything not produced by the entity itself. (So press releases don't count -- those can still be used to help write an article if it already has outside sources, but on their own, they're not enough to sustain an article, because they're not independent. Likewise, many blogs and internet forums are not reliable.) Generally you'll want at least two solid independent reliable sources to support the article. Shimeru (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]