User talk:Toug ma Tojer

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toug ma Tojer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like my account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all.

To continue editing, I made a new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some child then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Bullshit. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden.

Look, you guys seem to think that there is something so mystically difficult about your website that folks cannot work out how to edit it. Bullshit to that too. Any coder or sysadmin with half a brain could.

So there are these Irish guys like HighKing, Rashers and Cailil on a campaign to remove the term British Isles from the Wikipedia. It is all over the internet. One of them, tries to stick me with the names of a whole load of others he has rubbed up and fails ... why? Because I am not any of them.

Therefore I want the same right as "anyone" to edit the Wikipedia. Remember that? The Encyclopedia anyone can edit" not "anyone that agrees with the Irish".

Decline reason:

Unblock requests containing personal attacks will not be considered. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toug ma Tojer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Where is the personal attack? I have just stated the facts of the events. If there is anyone that ought to be offended, or has been "attacked", it is me. There is no attack in that statement. Can you please just look at the facts of the case instead of looking for some reason to avoid doing so?

Thank you. Toug ma Tojer (talk) 13:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you cannot lay out your case without personal attacks, I see no reason to even review this. Please note that repeated use of this template can result in your talk page being locked.Kuru (talk) 13:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toug ma Tojer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like my account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all.

To continue editing, I made this new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some one then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden.Toug ma Tojer (talk)

Decline reason:

Both this and the sock account are only used to pursue "British Isles" related conflicts rather than make productive edits. We do not need this. I see no reason to unblock either account. Sandstein 08:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note

Please observe that according to WP:BLANKING, declined unblock requests may not be removed as long as the block is active. Favonian (talk) 13:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toug ma Tojer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You force me to start a new account and then when I do, you accuse me of "sockpuppeting". Does that sound right to you?

I would like one account unblocked. I want one account that I can fairly edit from. There is nothing improper about the name Tojer. It is a perfectly common Swedish name just as, say, Anil is for Indians. I edited 3 topic and then had this name banned without being asked. That is all.

To continue editing, I made this new "acceptable" account called 'Sven the Big Viking'. Some one then banned it because it was meant to be a "sockpuppet" of the first one. Look at the creation dates and the reason for blocking. Only the name was forbidden.

Decline reason:

So a group of ski-masked ninjas broke into your house, held Glocks to your head with cocked hammers, and told you they'd pull the triggers unless you opened a new account? I didn't think so either, and otherwise you can't claim you were "forced" to open a new account. And, even allowing for your full control over your own actions in doing so, there is a procedure for abandoning old accounts in favor of a new one, which you didn't follow. Talk page access revoked; we've had enough of this and we need to be able to review requests from people who might actually have a valid reason to be unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

After just three edits across a variety of subjects, it is impossible for Sandstein to assert that I only wish to pursue "British Isles" related conflicts. Not only is the choice of the word "conflict" display prejudice. If that is the REAL reason you guys are blocking, you are blocking me because you don't like a valid point of view.

Therefore, let's scotch this "sockpuppet" crap for once and for all and remove it. I did NOT sockpuppet. I was not blocked, as "John" writes. Another fallacy. YOU PEOPLE forced me to register a new account. It was not MY choice. Therefore it is a little paradoxical for you to them accuse me of having multiple accounts.

Simple, just unblock one. I will be perfectly happy. Blocking because you do not like someone's point of view is against the rules as I read them. Toug ma Tojer (talk) 13:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing[edit]

Additional point, how can I defend my self hier if I cannot edit it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Toug_ma_Tojer Toug ma Tojer (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just for information, and without prejudice to the issue, on which I make no comment, the "child" who blocked the Sven account is a senior admin in wikipedia. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:03, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, also purely for openness, let us note that the English slang word "todger", which is not dissimilar from the word in your username, is slang in Anglo-American fo "penis", and "toug" is fairly similar to "tug". But you probably knew that. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We tend to see in life what we want to see. It is called "confirmational bias". Tug on your "todger" all you want Anthony, but keep it off my pages. Toug ma Tojer (talk) 13:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you are more highly qualified in psychiatry than I am I neither know nor care. But I suggest that pseudo-psychiatric suggestions are not helpful to your request, should you make a further one. And, for the record, anyone can edit any page here (unless it is protected), including what you inexactly refer to as "your" pages. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]