User talk:Trenton444

Reported[edit]

You have been reported at [1]

Better.They will see your misleading.Trenton444 (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

If you revert at Great power again without obtaining consensus for your changes I will block your account. Please see WP:Edit warring, WP:Identifying reliable sources and WP:Consensus Tiderolls 15:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tide rolls: I appologize to intervene, but it was Light Millennia who pushed its POV against consensus of other editors (me included). He was bold [2], then I reverted [3] and started discussion on the talk page [4]. Edit war madness followed... Pavlor (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if you bothered to read WP:RS (as I've advised multiple times), you'd know that my sources are more suitable for the lede seeing as they're more than 10 years newer. But that's irrelevant to the question or edit warring. I was objectively NOT the first editor who broke the WP:3RR. Light Millennia (talk) 15:35, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote on the article talk page, your sources are weak. You should gain consensus for your change first and not participate in edit warring. Pavlor (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we should not discuss this at someone else's talk page. But for the record, you never explained HOW they're weak and why the >10-year-old sources are more suitable for the lede. Light Millennia (talk) 15:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your post on my user talk, Trenton; irrelevant. You were edit warring and I could've blocked you without warning because your edit warring was unrelenting. You still may be blocked. I've stepped away from the situation because an edit warring report has been filed. Being right, and I'm not saying you are because I don't know, is no license to continue to revert. And actually, @Light Millennia:, you are also in danger of being blocked. Unless you have some way to show that Trenton is vandalizing, violating WP:BLP, WP:COPYVIO or violating a ban, you are in just as much danger. Tiderolls 15:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tide rolls: I am sorry to intervene,but seems that user Millennia Have changed the lead of the page great Power with a poor and POV sources. and "without consensus" ,pushing Israel and Iran at the same level of France or the UK with again poor and "lack" of reliable sources,there an image in the section Aftermath of the Cold War which can be debatable, but delete the old image and pushing a POV source is not fair. as well seems that user Millenia have a nice way of talk with other users,[5] sad for this Arbitrarily decisions without see a real consensus talked on Talk page.LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 16:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LuigiPortaro29 (talk)Now article it's really a disaster.He vandalized by pseudosources and ven without conmsensus. He should be banned. Article should be reverted to your good version.Trenton444 (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- - @LuigiPortaro29: @Pavlor:, Like Trenton and Light Millennia you all are discussing content. There's no need; at present I do not care about the article content. I am concerned with editor behavior. You all need to read WP:Edit warring; there are narrow, well defined instances where continued reverting is allowed. Even if consensus has been determined, edit warring is the wrong course to take. Tiderolls 16:52, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About content Trenton444 is right. Light Millenia is vandalizing with not sufficient sources the former good article. Light Millennia hasn't my consensus at all. I'll revert article too after 10/11.87.26.34.48 (talk) 17:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Stop accusing editors of vandalism that have not done so. Continuing to do so may construed as a personal attack. Besides falling short of a valid argument, this will jeopardize your editing privilege. Please read WP:NOTVAND to acquaint yourself with the Wikipedia policy that covers this situation. Tiderolls 15:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He deleted my and other people iin Great Power talk page.Incredible.Trenton444 (talk) 15:42, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning #2[edit]

I'm preparing to block you for sock puppetry at Talk:Great power. I will hold off the block if you go back to that page and strike the posts that you have made while logged out. Please attend to this sooner rather than later. Tiderolls 17:55, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here logged out because light were off.So i had to log in again.I write from fix computer.I didn't do that.Good feith is valid towards me too.Thank you for your attention.Trenton444 (talk) 09:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstand. I wasn't asking for an explanation, I am telling you I know what you have done. Now, you can make it right or I will have to proceed. Tiderolls 10:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't realize your english.I agree anyway with you because i trust you as administrator.Trenton444 (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, competency in English is important. Did you read the sock puppet policy I linked to above? You cannot post from multiple IPs in one discussion. I do not want to block you but the only way to avoid that is for you be honest about what you've done. Tiderolls 15:48, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now i realize you .You are correct.Trenton444 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you understand. You are still editing elsewhere without resolving the present situation. Again, please do not edit without addressing your previous actions. Tiderolls 16:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean i can't modify edit after i set my signature. I think i realized.Trenton444 (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tiderolls 17:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I am convinced that your lack of ability to communicate in English is contributing to your problems. Tiderolls 17:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]