User talk:Treunality

Welcome!

Hello, Treunality, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! →Journalist >>talk<< 20:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you.. -Splash^talk 22:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. You are reverting pretty blatant vandalism. Carry on. -Splash^talk 22:49, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Jacobs[edit]

I didn't want to get into a revert war, so I wanted to ask you first: You took away the heading "Wikipedians with articles" because you said that he's "not a wikipedian." I don't know how you're defining wikipedian, but he actually has contributed to wikipedia. Regardless, all I did was add a link to famous (or at least notable) people who have contributed to wikipedia (which some, like myself, may find interesting). Linking one article to another article is the one of trademarks of wikipedia and the link was relevant. So what is your justification for removing it?--Esprit15d 19:18, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know the IP is Jacobs? And if so, he still has not "contributed", he just has vandalized, adding gibberish from his supposed Indian assistant Honey K. Balani. Treunality 20:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm beginning to think you'll never write that Antioch daily Ledger article you're so sure will be come an article.BabuBhatt 21:30, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "rvv" means "revert vandalism". Edits you don't happens to agree with are not necessarily considered vandalism. BabuBhatt 21:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your inexplicable removal of the wikilink is vandalism. The newspaper is a relevant topic for an article, thus is properly wikified. The article doesn't have to exist already, nor do I have to write it. See Wikipedia:Red link. Treunality 21:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're a crazy cat, Treun! My suggestion is that seeing as you are so protective of it, why not go ahead and write it!BabuBhatt 21:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your only edits are to A.J, his book, this user page and mental floss. You must be A.J., his wife, friend, brother, something. What gives Treuna? BabuBhatt 04:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]