User talk:Triggerrabbit

Welcome[edit]

Hello Triggerrabbit and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! ◦ Trey Maturin 18:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wayne Mardle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Wayne Mardle[edit]

Hello, I'm Keith D. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wayne Mardle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.

Keith D (talk) 20:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding the same text to Wayne Mardle article. The text is unreferenced and is of little use as there are several things that he could not have done. I have requested others to comment on the talk page. If you continue I will have to block-you for disruptive editing and violating the tree revert rule. Keith D (talk) 20:51, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keith D (talk) 20:51, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Atkinson, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 19:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wayne Mardle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wayne Mardle was changed by Triggerrabbit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884659 on 2020-12-22T16:01:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wayne Mardle have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wayne Mardle was changed by Triggerrabbit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890515 on 2021-01-21T21:36:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Royal Navy Police have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Royal Navy Police was changed by Triggerrabbit (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853084 on 2021-04-28T20:15:55+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for years of disruption and vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone sees this i would like to apologise sincerely for my actions and would like to request being unblocked please thank you

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Triggerrabbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If anyone sees this i would like to apologise sincerely for my actions and would like to request being unblocked please thank you i will not vandalize any pages again sorry Triggerrabbit (talk) 16:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 17:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Triggerrabbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please i am really sorry and i have read all the information to refamialiarise myself with the rules. I was trying to be funny and i am so sorry i will never do it again. At this moment in time i have no information to update any source, however you have my word i will never vandalise a page on wikipedia again.

Triggerrabbit (talk) 17:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You started vandalizing in 2015; I don't know why you weren't blocked long ago. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just to be clear, after deliberately spending years attacking Wikipedia, you are now unwilling to follow the path you were offered to unblocking? Fair enough, I oppose any current and future unblock request you make. Other admins aren't obligated to take that into account, of course. --Yamla (talk) 19:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Triggerrabbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again i apologise unreservedly for vandalism. Clearly i have done nothing for months and i am pleading to be given a chance. I will never again vandalise anything you have my assurance on this matter. If i could make amends by changing an article factually then i would but i have nothing add to any article. Please i ask again lift my ban i will not abuse wikipedia again thank you. Triggerrabbit (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were offered a pathway to being unblocked above; you seem to be declining to take it. If you "have nothing to add to any article" then there is no need to remove the block, since blocks only prevent editing. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.