User talk:TruthCross

Welcome!

Hello, TruthCross, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --GunnarRene 17:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RahXephon[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Rahxephon, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --GunnarRene 17:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response moved to Talk:RahXephon#RahXephon_on_the_Nature_of_Reality by User:GunnarRene

I'm am responding to the {{helpme}}. I think the best place to bring up the issue is at Talk:RahXephon. Otherwise, if you have antoher question use {{helpme}} again after your question and we will check back.--Commander Keane 00:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am moving your response here: Talk:RahXephon#RahXephon_on_the_Nature_of_Reality. Let's continue it there. --GunnarRene 09:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contribution was moved here: Talk:RahXephon#RahXephon_on_the_Nature_of_Reality --GunnarRene 11:22, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RahXephon again[edit]

Hi. In case you come back to Wikipedia and haven't noticed, some of your text on Buddhism has now been included in RahXephon, rewritten and abridged by me. Now, how about Buddhist ontology and “Through the Looking Glass”? Is the essence of Buddhist ontology (more specifically its epistemology) that you can't really be certain about what is real, but that it doesn't matter? --GunnarRene 16:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]