User talk:TruthfulCooper

Welcome[edit]

Hello TruthfulCooper and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Map, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 05:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Halo Wars 2[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Halo Wars 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! AvalerionV 06:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at McAllen Memorial High School, you may be blocked from editing. EricEnfermero (Talk) 15:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to move your Miss Beazley infobox to the Draft namespace[edit]

See WP:DRAFTS. XYZt (talk) 00:56, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I'm stupid. XYZt (talk) 01:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

??? TruthfulCooper (talk) 01:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

The McAllen logo is not your own work, so please don't mark it as such. The Hudl picture is also not your own work. I have taken the pictures off already because of the violations. I am not an expert in Commons files, you'd have to ask for help in that project. My gut says there is a way to get the logo in under some kind of non-free fair use rationale but the Hudl picture is probably not OK due to copyrights. If you have questions, reply below or see my talk page. Regards, Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 18:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bull Terrier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Copyright violations and posting meme pictures in place of quality images is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Waggie (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravioli, you may be blocked from editing. Deliberating introducing factual errors such as this is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Waggie (talk) 19:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hamster. Waggie (talk) 19:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

page:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TruthfulCooper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edits I made were accurate representations of the page I edited. I don’t understand why I was banned for accurately portraying the article

Decline reason:

Even putting aside the repeated addition of non-free images from KnowYourMeme, this and this are clear instances of vandalism. clpo13_(talk) 19:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Jim Darling[edit]

The article Jim Darling has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 08:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Your recent editing history at Twitter shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sam Kuru (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 02:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 02:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]