User talk:TruthfulTalk9
2020[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GirthSummit (blether) 20:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
TruthfulTalk9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all writing Jat word with Ahluwalia caste is not wrong, since it was started by Jats as written in many sources/books(Not only the books added as the sources, but there are many other sources on claiming Ahluwalia caste as Jat ancestry & only due to marriage alliance with kalal community, other Kalals had started using the title/surname "Ahluwalia". The same was everytime informed to Mr. Utcursch on talk page, but he never agrees & rather he is interested blocking everyone. Secondly as "Ahluwalia" was also a misl(consisting about 10000 soldiers) there were many other caste, rather than only kalals, as later people(Jats) from Singhpuria misl(Jat misl) also joined Ahluwalia misl & started using Ahluwalia as their title/caste. So stating that currently Ahluwalia's are only kalals is wrong, as there may be many people using Ahluwalia surname as caste who are not Kalals/outcaste. I'm just requesting that everything should be studied from sources before writing anything on Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 04:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TruthfulTalk9 (talk) 02:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Writting reality with help of sources, but Mr. Utcursch wants to block everyone who is mentioning truth, maybe because he cannot accept the truth. TruthfulTalk9 (talk) 07:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
TruthfulTalk9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Respected Utcurschraj Atmaram well known as Utcursch, will block everyone from Wikipedia who add sourced information from books.
This account was only created because respected Utcurschraj Atmaram had told me on talk page that he will block my account as he never wanted changes mentioned on Wikipedia pages Ahluwalia, Ahluwalia caste & Ahluwalia misl & always wanted to add sources/books of his own wish & defame the entire Ahluwalia community & my request to any admin or reader of my unblock reason is that please check these Wikipedia pages, that why so many people make daily efforts to edit the above mentioned Wikipedia pages.
🙏My kind request to Wikipedia is to allow activation of one of my accounts, so that continuation of added sources is continued on Wikipedia🙏 or let the false information continue to be displayed on these Wikipedia pages. TruthfulTalk9 (talk) 03:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia does not judge whether information is "true" or "false", it only makes sure that independent reliable sources are summarized accurately. This is because what is "true" depends on the person; only you can decide what is "true" for you. If sources are not summarized accurately, we want to know about it, but you are clearly here with a larger agenda and when you didn't get your way you created other accounts. I do not see a benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you and as such I am declining your request. I don't see a pathway to being unblocked unless you agree to a topic ban from Indian castes and tell us what you will edit about instead, although that will be up to the next administrator to review any request you make. 331dot (talk) 10:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TruthfulTalk9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Answer to 331dot: kindly be informed that I had only created 2 accounts that's it & nothing more to it, only because I was informed that one of account is going to be blocked on the talk page of Ahluwalia caste.
Secondly please understand that it's not only me whose editing, but other people also mentioning the same thing or the same words on those above mentioned Wikipedia pages. Kindly review my request of unblocking 1 out of 2 accounts in which I assure to use single account & add trusted information from reliable sources/books. TruthfulTalk9 (talk) 10:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Why are you requesting an unblock on this account, too? You don't need open requests on two different accounts at the same time. This is obviously the same person as GurSikh123. Appeal your block on that account and tell us if you're Nikhil448. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.