User talk:Ttonyb1/September2010 Archives

/* METRO Fuel Oil Corp */

Tony, again I have tried to change some stuff around, so it doesn't sound like an advertisement. This is the first page I have ever written, so I'm not experienced with this type of thing. Can you please point out some of the texts that makes it seem like such an advertisement so I can make changes? I would really like to be able to the fix the wording around that appears to be creating a problem. Thanks.

Jabrams5 (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2010 (UTC) Jason

Sunset Strip

Hi. I've protected the Sunset Strip article so you guys stop edit warring on it. Please use the talk page there to discuss your edits. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but if you are not concerned about a possible copyright violation and removal of the "Possible copyright infringement" without clarification, then I don't have an interest in the article. I always thought warring pertained to non-vandalism edits. ttonyb (talk) 15:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

I get the sense that that editor really didn't know that their text was a copyvio. Maybe that's assuming a lot of good faith, but whatever. And yes, they should have stopped editing like that - especially with the warnings - but now that the article is locked, they're more or less forced into discussion. Anyway, I've engaged them on the talk page, and your input would be appreciated. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 16:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Cyberwit press

I think including details about this publishing company is of use for reference by people. The article upon Cyberwit press should not be deleted as it is created with a neutral point of view.It is one of the publishing companies of India and needs to be listed in Wikipedia according to me.

The article fails to meet the criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. ttonyb (talk) 06:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Romina cohn

Hello Ttonyb1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Romina cohn, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: won several awards is an asserton of importance. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 18:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I had looked and could not find any indication of any awards being won by the film. Additionally, the article states the film won the awards, not the writer or director. ttonyb (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

If you've checked the claim and think its a hoax then I'd recommend a {{hoax}} tag. As for the awards I'm not convinced that the article has sufficient notability to pass AFD, but the test for speedy is whether importance or significance is asserted. ϢereSpielChequers 05:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Caroline shotton page

Please give a valid reason to put it the category where lack of sources. Please refer the sources I have put in there. It is more than enough to justify the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.46.222 (talk) 12:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Please read WP:RS AND WP:BIO, specifically the part that talks about "non-trivial" coverage. ttonyb (talk) 16:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hey tony, how come you didn't place a csd tag on Southway College of Technology even though you said you did? :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

I believe the notification referred to the copy that was deleted. It looks as if the article was recreated after that. ttonyb (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Perfume Genius

"Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)"

despite reviews about Perfume Genius on New York Times, The Guardian and BBC Music my contribution on the artist has been deleted;

as from wikipedia notification I would request that the article be "userfied" and a copy emailed to me.

mh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Memory hunter (talk • contribs) 13:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Please contact one of the Admins listed in that message. They can userfy it for you. ttonyb (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

amira

can we add the article later once filming starts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerin12 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Notability has to be established as defined in WP:NOTFILM using reliable sources. ttonyb (talk) 04:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Estimated Towels

Topic has been read. As I conformed to all standards set forth, there appears to still be a responsibility as an editing intern as yourself to provide guidance and help people rather than just click buttons. If you really want to make a difference than show someone or provide insight pulled from your experience. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Csdemp (talk • contribs) 06:27, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

All you had to do was ask for help instead of continuing to duplicate the edits that were reversed. Please note that the author of an article has the burden of showing notability using reliable sources. You talk about a responsibility to help others, unfortunately, there is not such responsibility; however, I did try to start a dialog by adding a Welcome Message on your talk page with a number of very helpful links. Did you read any of the Welcome Message I left on your talk page? Given that you failed to respond to that message, I would venture to guess you did not. If you would like some help, all you need to do is ask. ttonyb (talk) 06:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Given your continued vandalism and WP:UNCIVIL comments, I am disappointed your review of WP:UNCIVIL appears to have been in vain. ttonyb (talk) 06:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion?

Why did you request a speedy deletion for my article about Novella Carpenter? She is the author of a book that got reviewed in the New York Times and made several best of 2009 lists. Although short the article is very well sourced. How could this possibly be a candidate for deletion.Uwhoff (talk) 07:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Take a look at WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. Additionally, the references do not meet the requirements in reliable sources. If you have any specific questions after reading the sections let me know. ttonyb (talk) 07:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I have looked at the guidelines. They read

"The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."

She created a well-known work that was reviewed by the New York Times and appeared on two independent Best of 2009 lists. All of these reviews are cited. Please explain to me how you came to the conclusion that this did not meet the criteria. Thanks. Uwhoff (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

The book that she has written is hardly "a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work." A "Best of Books" from an local book store nor a blogged entry does not really qualify as strong support for her. Please read reliable sources, with the exception of the NYTimes article, the other references do not fall into the criteria of reliable sources. ttonyb (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Which statement is poorly sourced? That she wrote the book or its contents? We have a NYT review for that. That it made some Best of 2009 lists? It is on one from the NYT and one from NPR plus some others. That she got a journalism degree and studied with Michael Pollan? We have her own words and her Barnes and Noble bio. That she is a contributing author at major publications? We have a page that links to her articles. Uwhoff (talk) 17:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Joyent

Hello Ttonyb1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Joyent, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: multiple references assert notability. Thank you. Kimchi.sg (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. ttonyb (talk) 17:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

34pin6

I see you've had interactions with 34pin6 (talk · contribs) and other socks of Smkovalinsky (talk · contribs) and Petrosianii (talk · contribs) on articles including Malizia_Clinic and David_Benowitz. He apparently owns a PR firm. Anyway, FYI, I blocked 34pin6 as a returning banned user. He's promising "war".[1] Judging from a recent blog entry, he was already mad at Wikipedia admins.   Will Beback  talk  03:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Wonderful 8-(

Thanks for the heads-up. Hopefully he/she will not cause too much disruption. My best to you and I wish you calm seas ahead. ttonyb (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Henderson (novelist)

I spotted a major blunder: omission of ==Writing== section, which I will correct within a few hours, also adding many more references. Would appreciate if article were not deleted before I can do this. Lizmall (talk) 11:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Have done that. I believe I've improved it, trying to keep on improving. Gathering references to support author notability. Thanks for your patience. Lizmall (talk) 01:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Forgive me for continuing a monologue, but I have another progress report re: Bill Henderson (novelist). An all new edit is up, much improved. There is no sign anyone has seen it. This is my first article and it's been quite an education. I hope to do more. I'm posting here because you (i.e. Ttonyb1) are the editor who lodged the notability complaint and posted the deletion warning. I've read everything I can find about this process but it is still confusing. Two editors objected to deletion (I'm guessing that's what "keep" means), but is this a process whereby I should actively round up more support from other editors? Or will you and the other two come to a prompt decision (taking into consideration current improvements)? The new edit addresses notability and sourcing concerns. It's a process, of course: I'm continuing to discover new sources about the author. If anyone can help me find more, I would be grateful. As for the orphan tag, could that possibly be a bit premature, given that the page is only several days old, and under threat of deletion? In any case, I'm trying to address that too, by suggesting links from other pages where it is appropriate for me to do so. Again, excuse the verbiage. I will not make a habit of this; if you think back to your own earliest days as one who wanted to begin comprehending the ways of Wikipedia, you might understand what is prompting me. I do want to learn as I go (and already have). Thanks.Lizmall (talk) 22:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

First of all, no need to apologize. You are doing the right thing by trying to improve the article. You are right, the "keep" notation in the AfD is a objection to the deletion of the article – they disagree with my nomination. Canvassing/shopping for "votes!" is not acceptable in AfD's. AfD's are listed in WP:AFD and the list is reviewed by numerous editors on a regular basis. I would not worry about the orphan tag – it will not dilute the article.

As it stands it looks as if the article will survive. Keep up the good work and if you have any further questions, please let me know. ttonyb (talk) 22:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. That is good news, and very helpful. I will continue working on it. No more questions for now, but I do look forward to the day those tags are gone. Lizmall (talk) 23:13, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help with the refs on Billy Coyle. I'm still learning... Arbor832466 (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure. You can use the tool at [2]. It is easy and fast to use. My best to you. ttonyb (talk) 22:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Luke

As the only other editor to edit the article I thought I should notify that I have nominated Brad Luke for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Luke. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Marty and Doug's New Religion

Please refer to the three independent third party sources in the references section before nominating a page for speedy deletion for being "insignificant". —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomMcComery (talk • contribs) 02:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

What makes you so sure I did not? I suggest you read the specifics of WP:WEB - the criteria section talks about needing "non-trivial" coverage. I also suggest you read reliable sources concerning what is considered to be good sourcing practices. ttonyb (talk) 02:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Evangelist Shyju Mathew

what do i need to do for the improvement of the article.. :( pls help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elina14 (talk • contribs) 08:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

The article is a copyright violation. It needs to be rewritten in your own words. ttonyb (talk) 12:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princeton Holt

Could you comment on my and Michael Schmidt's comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princeton Holt, please? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Nazril Idrus

good afternoon , can you help me .. why my page deleted?? ref to : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazril_Idrus .. i created this article myself ..—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nurshahlan.nasrun (talk • contribs) 08:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Please read the deletion notice on the page for more information. ttonyb (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princeton Holt

It seems obvious that new editors User:Pujashastri and User:Justaperson in ny do not understand format and style. And yes... the WP:BURDEN is (usually) on the article author, newbie editors simply do not know how to meet or carry that burden. So, and while still not perfect, I have performed some cleanup to the article... fixing refs, removing improper ELs and doing a general copyedit, to turn what you first sent to AFD[3] into THIS. Perhaps you might concur that when removed from mainspace it is far more suitable now if either userfied or incubated? Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree that userfied or incubated is a viable alternative. I'll post my concurrence in the AfD. ttonyb (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I much appreciate your gracious words at the AFD. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Jeff Burkholder

Why did you delete my page on Jeff Burkholder? I was trying to come by more reliable information and add it later. Jeff Burkholder is a real person that I know to have political promince to the reader of my article. I would like to hear back from you, for more information--in any case thank you for reading this.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. A. Hobbs (talk • contribs) 23:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I did not delete your page, I only nominated for deletion. The article was deleted by an Admin because it failed to meet the criteria in WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 23:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion of Abnormality (band)

Hello. I've declined your speedy deletion nomination of Abnormality (band) because it claims notability -- see #10 of WP:BAND. Also the article is very new and being worked on. Please do not tag articles quite so hastily, as it can put off new editors. I notice that this is your fourth declined speedy this month. I strongly suggest you review the criteria for speedy deletion and consider being less hasty. Thank you! — GorillaWarfare ^talk 02:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. ttonyb (talk) 03:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Ohlly

I've reported them for vandalism. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...that was to be my next step. ttonyb (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

For this "http://www.kbsworldi.com/vshow_eng.aspx?vshow=195" you did but not for the second summary. Ohlly (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

The point is that you were aware of the copyright violation and yet you continued to add the text. ttonyb (talk) 05:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Anyway, it's over now. Let it go. Ohlly (talk) 05:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Let what go? You seem to continue to add comments to my talk page. ttonyb (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I am the article's creator- first time using Wikipedia. I thought I was adding appropriately based upon looking at how it was done within other articles. I am out of time and have to go. Feel free to correct the format, and sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.12.188.245 (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Unikkatil article

Greetings, Ttonyb1 i am fairly new to Wiki, but i was wondering why you removed the Family category from the Unikkatil article? i had actually worked on that for a while and went through a lot to get that picture of his great-grandfather. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeTBA (talk • contribs) 02:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

It had very little relevance to the article. notability is not inherited. The text would have been appropriated if the article was about the familty. ttonyb (talk)

I was just trying to be informative about his family, was not trying to prove his notability with that section, he is notable on his own, but i guess an article about the family might be better. Thanks, JoeTBA (talk) 03:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Steve White (Sailor) deletion

Tony, now that you've done a rapid delete of the Steve White (Sailor) article, how do I find it to put a "Hangon" notice at the top? White Ocean Racing (talk) C. Mark White - White_Ocean_Racing —Preceding undated comment added 15:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC).

You can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. After the article is recreated, you need to use the tag {{hangon}}. Please note that since the article was deleted as a copyright violation a recreation without some additional work on your part will see the article again deleted.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. ttonyb (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Bill Henderson (novelist) afD discussion

Question for you, Tony: as you graciously predicted above, result of the afD discussion was keep and the Bill Henderson (novelist) page has survived; I've worked hard in the past week to supply richer material and new references - there are over twice as many now, with some added support for notability, specific dates cleaned up. I acknowledge my first version came up woefully short in both areas, but I can't help but believe my work (which is continuing, mind you) has been in a good part responsible for the keep result, and that the page is now ready to sail forth unencumbered with "war wounds." So, my question: when can those tags, which (to me) no longer seem to apply to the article's present state, be removed? What is the procedure for that--i.e. who may or may not, etc. How does it happen, and when?

Again, this article (my first) has been quite an education, to say the least, and I imagine that will continue, won't it? Thanks for your patience and understanding. Lizmall (talk) 19:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

2000

Dear Tony, I do not understand why you have declared my edits as vandalism. Princess Salma bint Al Abdullah is a princess of Jordan, the daughter of King Abdullah II and Queen Rania. She already has her own wikipedia article page. I was just stating a fact that she was born in 2000, a notable birth and a member of the Royal Hashemite family of Jordan. Wikipedia has members of royal families listed even younger than that. Why is Princess Salma not considered "constructive" enough to be mentioned as a birth in 2000? I have tried listing her 3 or 4 times no avail. If you think this information is bogus, then I suggest you read King Abdullah's and Queen Rania's offical websites. Her siblings are already referenced in 1994, 1996 and 2005. Why not Salma in 2000? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.178.194 (talk) 02:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

The criteria for inclusion into the 2000 article is defined by WP:RY. This person does not meet the criteria for inclusion. I indicated the reason for the deletion in the edit summary, yet you continued to add it back to the article. ttonyb (talk) 02:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

My apologies Ttonyb1. I did not know that Princess Salma had to have at least 10 articles in other languages to be included in the list. I assumed the royal birth of a reigning head of state, who already has her own Wikipedia article Princess Salma bint Al Abdullah, would be notable enough. I will refrain from posting Princess Salma's entry in 2000, eventhough her siblings Prince Hussein (1994), Princess Iman (1996) and Prince Hashem (2005) have already been granted this honor in their own birth years. I would think vandalism is defacing an article with slurs, profanity or pornographic references. Stating that the daughter of a reigning monarch was born in the year 2000 is not vandalism. When I saw my entries "disappear" I thought it was a system issue, not over-zealous editing... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.211.178.194 (talk) 03:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

The criteria in WP:RY was decided upon by consensus, not by any one individual, so you are correct the article is not ready for inclusion. I am not sure how you would characterize an attempt to follow Wikipedia guideline as over-zealous editing. By best to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Soccorso Clown article

Dear Administrator,

Thank you for your information. As the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the article Soccorso CLown, I have sent the following e-mail

free license (att.OTRS) subject: Soccorso Clown Date: 24 settembre 2010 15:45:09 GMT+02:00 To: permissions-en@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the article('s) published in the web site www.soccorsoclown.it, and in particular at the following

URL http://www.soccorsoclown.it/page10/page10.html

as well, as the legal representative of Soccorso Clown s.c.s. ONLUS organization, to which the www.soccorsoclown.it belongs. I agree to : publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

signed

legal representative of Soccorso Clown s.c.s. ONLUS The creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the site DATE 24 September 2010

I hope that it would solve the present problem.

However, if you would read the article Soccorso Clown, proposed for Wikipedia with more attention you would find, that although both articles, (the one, which is for Wikipedia and the one which is in our web site) are naturally operate with the same facts, but not identical, and had been written in a different way, as well. as contain slightly different information. Thank you again for your attention. (Yuryo (talk) 14:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC))Yuryo (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I did not closely read the article. The article was a slight reformulation of the original text. If you were familiar with Wikipedia guidelines and U.S. copyright laws you would be aware that slight reformulation of the original text is still a violation of the original copyright. ttonyb (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your Vandalism on Adam Hochfelder Article

Thanks for your vandalism on the Adam C. Hochfelder article. I am not sure what triggered the synaptic attack but you literally removed several references & all of the descriptions accompanying the references, leading someone else to post a {{bareurls}} template. This is not the first time this has happened on Wikipedia from your "supposed" efforts, so I am not sure what possesses you to undo what someone else has properly done. But thanks for destroying the article. You are exceptionally talented... Stevenmitchell (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Just to note: I've left Stevenmitchell a warning on his talk regarding this personal attack. Your edit certainly wasn't vandalism, although I would advise you to be careful to check the output of the Reflinks tool before saving in future. Looks like some of the NYTimes archive doesn't like being unable to set cookies, which breaks Reflinks. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 18:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 18:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir Trehan????

Why did you request a speedy deletion for the article about Sudhir Trehan? He is the one of the repute personality , alumni of Birla Institute of Technology-Ranchi.How could this possibly be a candidate for deletion. As stated by you, this is not a copyright problem. Article has been written in own word with citations. Samyo (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

This was hardly written in your own words. This was a copyright issue as it closely resembled the text in [4]. ttonyb (talk) 17:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

The link being shown by you in your comment is mere the reference page of the website which was added by me in the aforesaid article. Please be constructive at WIKIPEDIA.Samyo (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

The page contained the original text that you copied. Nominating a page that violates copyright guidelines for deletion is being constructive - adding copyrighted text to Wikipedia is not. For your information, I did not delete the page, I only nominated it. The nomination was reviewed by someone else and they agreed it was a copyright violation and they deleted it. ttonyb (talk) 17:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Tom_Cole_cowboy_singer

hi tony, i reverted that user also but then reremoved the db template as the author had changed the article, was going to replace it with db-a7. but reverting is fine with me, i'm indifferent. cheers WookieInHeat (talk) 04:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I saw that. The article is still a close copy of the second paragraph. ttonyb (talk) 04:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I Will Follow

Hi Tony, I have started and written the "i Will Follow" film page in the same way that others are written. Usually reference links are enough. Can you tell me why you need inline citations for a festival-award winning film when I've already added reference links? I've checked many other film pages for correct format and they do not have or have not been required to have inline citations to be cleared. I don't know how to do them and am not sure why I need them when so many other film pages do not. Please advise me and thank you for your time. MM P.S. Checked back for your answer but still none. Pls kindly respond and guide me here, thx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariemaye (talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Fifteensquared.net

As the article states it's a valuable resource for the small in number but dedicated followers of cryptic crosswords. But delete if you must I won't argue. SmokeyTheCat 07:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Venom vicious

This article should seriously not be deleted because the artist is notable. He already has an album out in stores right now. There are also two reviews out right now on him. You can even look him up on google. Don't worry, he will be doing major things later on. This is a music artist that is blowing up right now. I get the sense that you are trying to stop people from writing about artist who have became successful period. Let me know what you think. From Afro55 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.8.200 (talk) 03:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

The article appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. ttonyb (talk) 03:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Articles for Creation submission

Hi Ttonyb1, according to the edit history you tagged a article , Subir Sarkar, for deletion. This article was also tagged with: {{AFC submission}}

Articles tagged with this tag are Article for Creation submissions. If the article is in mainspace it should be moved to

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Articlename and the redirect should be tagged for deletion. The article tagged for deletion has been moved to the Article for Creation space and the deletion tag has been removed.Misplaced submissions are automatically tagged with with a misplaced Articles for Creation template. This template will appear at the top of the page. Before deleting articles please check for this template. Thank you. --Alpha Quadrant ^talk 03:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I am not sure it was tagged as such when I originally saw it. Perhaps I missed it. ttonyb (talk) 03:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Bob Baldock

Hello Ttonyb1. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Bob Baldock to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Kimchi.sg (talk) 08:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Flea Circus

Hi Tony, just a quick note to say thanks for all the tidying up and fixing of references you've done on the Flea Circus page. I do like to think I'm one of the World's experts on Flea Circuses but will leave it to people like yourself to be experts in Wikipedia. Cheers, Andy Flea Circus Director (talk) 16:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure. ttonyb (talk) 20:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)