User talk:Ttt74

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Solid-state drive has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Solid-state drive was changed by Ttt74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883014 on 2016-02-10T00:26:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Ttt74, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ttt74! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 17:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions apply to articles about Muhammad, broadly construed

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Muhammad, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

—C.Fred (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

@C.Fred: Sorry for the late reply. I was aware of what you said, so I left the Muhammad article as it is and instead used to discuss on the talk page. However, I didn't understand why I got banned from editing Muhammad articles, after Jeppiz accused me of disrupting the Depictions of Muhammad article, which I didn't, on the noticeboard [1]. Ttt74 (talk) 22:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm going to suggest that you confine that discussion to the noticeboard thread you linked, on account of your topic ban. —C.Fred (talk) 22:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Ttt74 (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 18:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been topic banned for six months from all editing related to Muhammad.

You have been sanctioned for repeated disruption of Muhammad-related articles as well as intemperate attacks on other users and a complete failure to listen to good advice.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 19:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

• For more details of the reasons for the ban, see this ANI thread. Bishonen | talk 21:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC).

Blocked for 48 hours

You have been blocked for disruptive editing on articles relating to Mohamed. Please note this is not an Arbitration related block, but a standard one. You are welcome to read the advice at WP:GAB if you choose to appeal this block. I've chosen a short duration block because it is my hope this will get your attention and stop the disruption now, while giving you a chance to understand why your actions are not acceptable. Your constant reverting is the problem, as is your attitude when dealing with those that disagree with you. You will fare better if you learn the system here instead of correcting everyone that disagrees with you, particularly when they seem to be correct on the procedure and decorum we expect around here. If you continue to take a battleground approach after you are unblocked, you shouldn't be surprised if you get longer or indef blocks in the future. As always, any admin is free to act on this block without my being contacted. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

• I see that Bishonen has issued a topic ban under the above Sanction. This is independent of this block, and how it is handled, I'm happy to leave to her. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

He doesn't need both, IMO. And I had even invited him to continue to post in the ANI thread despite the topic ban. I've unblocked. Bishonen | talk 20:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC).

Warning: topic ban violation

You have already violated your topic ban by editing Muhammad. One more violation and you will be blocked. It looks like you don't understand what a topic ban is. Please read my ban notice, and click on the links. WP:TBAN explains what it means to be topic banned. Try to take it in. Bishonen | talk 13:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC).

I just wanted to add a template message; Sorry for not being aware of such violation. Ttt74 (talk) 14:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

You also violated the topic ban here. Bishonen already gave you the link to WP:TBAN but to explain it again, simply: you cannot do anything related to Muhammad in any way. And I'm sorry, but if you cannot understand what the ban means, the only alternative will unfortunately be to block you from the site altogether. You have received an enormous amount of explanations, yet no sign of understanding them. Jeppiz (talk) 20:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

The topic ban would even include discussing the topic of Mohammad here on your talk page, or anywhere at Wikipedia. No templates, no edits, no discuss, no images, no anything. Any single future breach will result in a block. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Notice of discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at the NPOV noticeboard regarding an issue in which you have been involved. Thank you. Jeh (talk) 00:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Since you say you're taking a long break, I'll let it ride, but this WP:POINTy edit was pretty bad, and an illustration of your tendency to accuse a particular person of "assuming bad faith" on all occasions, however farfetched. See also my revert. I hope it was merely a sign that you were temporarily upset. I hope you'll come back refreshed in the summer, and better prepared to edit collaboratively. Bishonen | talk 08:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC).

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ttt74. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)