User talk:TullikaInode1

This is TullikaInode1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence Node (May 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NCOMPANY and indicate why this company is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence Node and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intelligence Node, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 10:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TullikaInode1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 10:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection[edit]

Hello TullikaInode1. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Intelligence Node, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TullikaInode1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TullikaInode1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I work for Intelligence Node and our company page was live from last 4 years. It got deleted due to some references. I am trying to create the page again following all wikipedia guidelines. Its not paid. Thank you for reviewing my request. What should I do next . Can I add my employer name without marking it as Paid.

TullikaInode1 (talk) 16:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia defines "paid" broadly in this context. Company employees whose job functions include any kind of publicity efforts or marketing, such as search engine optimization (SEO), are deemed to be paid editors, regardless of whether they have been ordered to edit Wikipedia or are being compensated specifically for editing Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I have added the required disclosure on my profile.

TullikaInode1 (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence Node (May 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence Node and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intelligence Node, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I have added three references, one from Vcccircle, 2nd from techcrunch, 3rd from techinasia. All are genuine sources.

TullikaInode1 (talk) 13:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence Node (May 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Highly promotional and, judging from the text, probably written by the company's own marketing department. Phrases such "....that empowers businesses to drive product level profitability and grow margins using data-driven competitive insights" and ".....SaaS-based delivery model and generates big data analytics for large and small retailers and brands" is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia and, more significantly, the exact phrases are to be found on several web sites raising serious questions about copyright violation. It also raises questions about how many of these references are actually based on press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence Node and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intelligence Node, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Intelligence Node has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Intelligence Node. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence Node (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Every ref that I could see was clearly direct marketing via press release or interview. One ref was blacklisted on my set-up so I was unable to check that out. No evidence of any independent and reliable sources discussing this company. Looks like all paid for content

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Hi : Hi, None of the reference is paid . Do you mean to say Economic times, Techcrunch, WWD which are leader in their segment will charge amount and promote companies like that. This is a very biased judgement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revionics , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceros . These companies have also added news references . How are they different then . Aren't they doing paid promotion? How are you so sure that these references are not paid. If wikipedia doesn't support news reference then why are they giving preference to add online news.

TullikaInode1 (talk) 17:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence Node and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intelligence Node, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:29, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your draft article Draft:Intelligence Node[edit]

Hi, TullikaInode1. I noticed your discussion at User talk:Velella. First of all, thank you for disclosing your connection with the company Intelligence Node on your userpage. As you allude to here, there was a previous article about the company, created in 2016, which was deleted after this deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligence Node. The reason for the deletion was lack of notability because of poor sourcing. The article had scarcely any independent secondary sources, but, in the main, only "press releases, opinion blogs or articles written by company founders". Such sources do not establish notability. Starting a new article a mere three months after the earlier one was deleted for lack of notability seems rather hasty; it just looks unlikely to me that the company would have attracted more notability and more serious sources in that space of time. And sure enough, the sources in your version are no better than the earlier ones. I considered deleting your draft as premature, and because you have been pushing so hard to get it accepted into mainspage; but as a show of good faith, I will leave it in draftspace so that — at least theoretically — you have a chance to improve it. However, since the problem is lack of notability, I'm not optimistic: if the reliable secondary sources simply don't exist, you can't very well conjure them up. Anyway, please stop pushing. Don't submit your draft for review over and over, and don't nag the reviewers. You realize that unlike you, they are not paid for their work here — they are volunteers — so please respect their time. Bishonen | tålk 17:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Intelligence Node (May 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Intelligence Node and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Intelligence Node, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Intelligence Node[edit]

Hello, TullikaInode1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intelligence Node, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Taking Out The Trash. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Intelligence Node[edit]

Hello, TullikaInode1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Intelligence Node".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]