User talk:Tvcine46

This is Tvcine46's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not present as a usable Wikipedia item. Please review WP:YFA and WP:MOS. A look at some existing articles, on similar topics, may assist.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tvcine46/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tvcine46/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 23:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tvcine46! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 23:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eviolite were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Has not changed since the last decline; entirely unsourced and practically incomprehensible.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tvcine46/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tvcine46/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

eviolite (talk) 02:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP: ANYBIO / WP:NACTOR / WP:NCREATIVE, lacks any references or sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tvcine46/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tvcine46/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 21:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cual es el problema ustedes no explican las razones bien que clases de bibliotecarios son digamen cual es el problema Tvcine46 (talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Ruy (talk) 19:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

quiten el dichoso blokeo por favor Tvcine46 (talk) 20:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Subpágina de documentación[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Subpágina de documentación, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is English wikipedia. You must write and communicate in English only here. Not doing so has proven disruptive, and your edits appear to be intended to promote one person. I recognise you have already been indefinitely blocked from Spanish Wikipedia, and you may soon find that happens to you here. Once your block expires, please explain (in English) precisely what it is you want to achieve here, and do not create nonsense templates in other languages again.Further disruptive edits or vandalism will see your block extended. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I note that earlier today on Spanish Wikipedia (before they blocked you) that you threatened to sue the editors there. Be aware of our policy on English Wikipedia of No Legal Threats. Any user that makes them is immediately blocked. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Viviana Conde, a reporter from Tampa Bay TV 46, we have a complaint of abuse by her librarians, actor Kaly Cordova, who can search for it on Google, hired a professional librarian and her people blocked him, they don't help at all, the only thing you know is blocking and abuses like we can solve this problem for actor kaly cordova su user name is tvcine 46

You do not have permission to modify this page, for the following reason: Your username or IP address has been blocked. The reason is: There are several blocks against your account or IP address. Block start: 19:16 13 Aug 2022 Longest block expiration: infinity Relevant block identifiers: #4212094, #4212065 (your IP address may also be found on some block lists) Your current IP address is 72.185.54.252. Please include all of the above details in any queries you make. Tvcine46 (talk) 20:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jimmy wales is urgent read the note

VIVIANA CONDE <>

4:01 PM (6 minutes ago)

to jwales

Hi, I'm Viviana Conde, a reporter from Tampa Bay TV 46, we have a complaint of abuse by her librarians, actor Kaly Cordova, who can search for it on Google, hired a professional librarian and her people blocked him, they don't help at all, the only thing you know is blocking and abuses like we can solve this problem for actor kaly cordova su user name is tvcine 46

You do not have permission to modify this page, for the following reason: Your username or IP address has been blocked. The reason is: There are several blocks against your account or IP address. Block start: 19:16 13 Aug 2022 Longest block expiration: infinity Relevant block identifiers: #4212094, #4212065 (your IP address may also be found on some block lists) Your current IP address is 72.185.54.252. Please include all of the above details in any queries you make. Tvcine46 (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not following your message. You state that Kaly Cordova "hired a professional librarian". You also attempted to create content about Cordova. Are you indicating that you were paid by Cordova to create an article for them? —C.Fred (talk) 20:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If so, and they blocked the content, they never allowed the photo to be uploaded. Viviana Conde, the reporter, sent an email to Mr. Jimmy Wale. He lived in Florida. If she has to take me to her house, she will do it because of abuse. The librarian is very upset by the bad treatment. that they have given the actor one the actor does not know a computer and you do not help him what they do is block it we have seen blocking from different months do not you think it is a little abusive we are waiting for the notification from Mr Jimmy Wales what he has to tell us about it look for it in google who is actor kaly cordova Tvcine46 (talk) 20:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the actor is being submissive if the other members of the reporter like telemundo and univision find out they will go to jimmy wale's house so he can say why so much abuse even insulted the actor we have the evidence Tvcine46 (talk) 20:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that threatening to bring in press organizations does fall into the same category as legal threats. Anything that causes a chilling effect in discussion requires editors to have their editing privileges revoked while the threats are in force. —C.Fred (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The question is about you. You should know if you were hired by Cordova or not. And you identified yourself in an earlier edit as Viviana Conde. So I repeat the question: Viviana, were you hired by Kaly Cordova to create an article about her? —C.Fred (talk) 20:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.kinorium.com/name/2883536/

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm5342811/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0380201/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm

evidence the actor kaly cordova Tvcine46 (talk) 20:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of that addresses my question. —C.Fred (talk) 20:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you were told that the actor hired a professional and that he does not know a computer Tvcine46 (talk) 22:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Cordova paid him to create the article with another account of the person and with everything they blocked it, so months passed and the librarian did it this month and they also blocked it, everything was perfect Tvcine46 (talk) 22:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you blocked the page immediately, not allowing him to post a photo, they even insulted and mocked the television media to talk to Mr. Jimmy Wales, look when they burling the actor kaly cordova Tvcine46 (talk) 22:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The actor is telling me that they told him he was going through himself and it was the librarian and another person made fun of it I think that is in bad taste he sent all the information to the press and journalists Tvcine46 (talk) 22:17, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Resetting the question. The first thing I'm trying to establish is whether you are a paid editor or not.

You have attempted to create content about Kaly Cordova. What is your relationship with Cordova? Are you being paid by Cordova or any entity representing Cordova? —C.Fred (talk) 02:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am vivian conde journalist and editor "Tampa Tv 46 Mr. Cordova hired us to do his biography since you delete it believing that he is not the public figure is the original actor do you understand or not he does not know computers they just called me today to come to your residence...let's see what you told him I can't be coming this account belongs to the actor kaly cordova I'm just his writer...Mr. vivian Conde Tvcine46 (talk) 16:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tvcine46: I am afraid Kaly Cordova might have made a mistake in hiring you to write about him. Because this is English Wikipedia, not Spanish Wikipedia, a certain level of skill in writing and communicating in English is required here. I do not mean to be rude, but I simply do not feel you have those skills (just as I could not create an article on Spanish Wikipedia). I am sorry to have to say that to you. Be aware that we do not accept IMDB as a suitable source. IMDB is not seen as 'Reliable' because any person can edit IMDB. As a journalist, you should know that editorial oversight (supervisión editorial) is an essential part of any newspaper. IMBD does not have any editorial oversight! And, looking at the IMDB entry for Kaly Cordova, they seem to have paid someone with the same English-writing skills as yourself to create it. I am afraid this IMDB entry that you linked to above makes no sense whatsoever. It is just nonsense. Based on those sources (and my own Google search for the name "Kaly Coldova", I do not believe there are sufficient sources out there to create a Wikipedia article about him.

Kaly Cordova does not yet meet our criteria for an article here on Wikipedia (see WP:NACTOR for details of those criteria.)
I advise you not to continue trying to create an article about Kaly Cordova, and to give back any money he has already paid you.

Spanish translation by Google:

Kaly Cordova no cumple con nuestros criterios para un artículo aquí en Wikipedia (ver WP:NACTOR para obtener detalles de esos criterios).
Te aconsejo que no sigas intentando crear un artículo sobre Kaly Cordova y que le devuelvas el dinero que ya te ha pagado.

Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 19:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, an IMDB can be done by anyone, but you cannot name actors or cast because they will be investigated, so if you do not know anything about social networks, stay in your area and do not say what is not true for this in a cast of hollywood there is an IMDB investigation one thing is the collaborators another is the IMDB actors they are specialists if you are an actor or contributor there are two things so leave the arrogance Tvcine46 (talk) 21:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for affirming that you are a paid editor. Now, where is this biography that you say we deleted? The only page I see that you created and was deleted is Template:Subpágina de documentación, which was not written in English. I do not see any attempt to create an English-language article about Cordova. —C.Fred (talk) 11:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello c fred what it says about the imdb that anyone can do can make a record that is true but if the person is not an actor nor did he participate in the movie that goes to an evaluation mr cordova is a hollywood actor you can know about wiki pedia but searched by google is lost here I sent you what they commented I don't know if it was you or your collaborators who are lost in space with all the respect you deserve leave the arrogance Mr. Cordova is going to sue wikipedia he already has his lawyers for infringing you "_______________________ I am afraid Kaly Cordova might have made a mistake in hiring you to write about him. Because this is English Wikipedia, not Spanish Wikipedia, a certain level of skill in writing and communicating in English is required here. I do not mean to be rude, but I simply do not feel you have those skills (just as I could not create an article on Spanish Wikipedia). I am sorry to have to say that to you. Be aware that we do not accept IMDB as a suitable source. IMDB is not seen as 'Reliable' because any person can edit IMDB. As a journalist, you should know that editorial oversight (supervisión editorial) is an essential part of any newspaper. IMBD does not have any editorial oversight! And, looking at the IMDB entry for Kaly Cordova, they seem to have paid someone with the same English-writing skills as yourself to create it. I am afraid this IMDB entry that you linked to above makes no sense whatsoever. It is just nonsense. Based on those sources (and my own Google search for the name "Kaly Coldova", I do not believe there are sufficient sources out there to create a Wikipedia article about him.

Kaly Cordova does not yet meet our criteria for an article here on Wikipedia (see WP:NACTOR for details of those criteria.)

I advise you not to continue trying to create an article about Kaly Cordova, and to give back any money he has already paid you.

Spanish translation by Google:

Kaly Cordova no cumple con nuestros criterios para un artículo aquí en Wikipedia (ver WP:NACTOR para obtener detalles de esos criterios).

Te aconsejo que no sigas intentando crear un artículo sobre Kaly Cordova y que le devuelvas el dinero que ya te ha pagado.

Many thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 19:47, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply] Tvcine46 (talk) 20:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 02:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]