User talk:Twile

Late Welcome[edit]

Hi, Twile, Late welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm sure you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.

Happy Wiki-ing, and sorry for the late welcome ;)

Hi[edit]

I removed the Homeworld Reference because there was no link or where it leads to there was no information in *Homeworld Historical and Technical Briefing (Manual). Go ahead and explain what is it use for. Then i will undo the delete. --SkyWalker 21:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me what the reference is for?. There is no need for it. --SkyWalker 21:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Do you think it is needed?. I will be glad to assist you in Homeworld Series --SkyWalker 21:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added your reference have fun. --SkyWalker 22:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ships[edit]

Rather than create a separate article for each ship, can't this information be combined into a single ship-list article that includes a table of attributes? Not only with this reduce the number of individual articles, but it will also provide the user with a quick comparison list that allows them to instantly evaluate two (or more) ships together. Rklawton 17:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impressed[edit]

Regarding the Homeworld ships AFD - I just wanted to say that I'm impressed with your ability to compromise and willingness to revise your ideas based on the input of others. There can never be enough of that on Wikipedia. Best of luck with future endeavours! Wickethewok 05:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I wish I had more kind words to say, but I must say I'm rather put off and disgusted at how much delight you and others seem to extract from the deletion of articles, especially "cruft". Speaking from personal experience, it doesn't feel nice when you dedicate 5 or 6 hours a day for a week or two to a handful of articles, trying to get them to conform to the manual of style, spell and grammar check, make sure information is accurate, and try to make the information readable, understandable, and professional sounding... only to have some people mass-nominate your stuff for deletion on the basis of it being cruft or otherwise unsuitable for Wikipedia. It seems like people who are keen on deleting it should be appologetic ("I'm sorry, but I'm just following the rules, just doing my job") to those who donated time and effort to Wikipedia, and try to revise and improve the articles in question before trying to delete them. Quite the opposite, people seem to delight in calling things cruft and trying to get them deleted. You got a barnstar for helping to delete an article? I'm a decent person so I'll follow the rules on here. Maybe next time you want to "clean up" Wikipedia and scrub the cruft off of the internet, you should browse through WP:Assume good faith first and pretend you don't enjoy it as much as you do. --Twile 16:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Naggarok.jpg)[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Naggarok.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This message also applies to each of the following images.

—Bkell (talk) 23:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hiigara[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Hiigara, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiigara. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kiith Somtaaw[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kiith Somtaaw, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiith Somtaaw. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 06:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ships of Homeworld[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ships of Homeworld, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ships of Homeworld (2nd nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 10:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kharak.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kharak.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Homeworld Ship[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Homeworld Ship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HomeworldC Box.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HomeworldC Box.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Homeworld[edit]

Template:Homeworld has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fleet Command (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Homeworld[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Homeworld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]