User talk:Twinkle in the eye

Welcome!

Hello, Twinkle in the eye, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The orphan killer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Acroterion (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The orphan killer[edit]

The article The orphan killer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable [production

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Acroterion (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Hello! I'm a bot created by another Wikipedia editor. I wanted to let you know that I removed a link that you recently added to the page The orphan killer here. I did this because http://hertzoggslideshowreviews.blogspot.com/2011/09/orphan-killer-review.html, http://hayeshudsonshouseofhorror.blogspot.com/2011/09/blu-ray-review-orphan-killer-2011.html is probably inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We usually avoid linking to blogs, forums, and social media sites.

We appreciate your help in making Wikipedia better for everyone. If I made a mistake, feel free to undo my edit. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Help desk.

Thank you! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to delete the article, I can blank it and put up a template to have it deleted at the request of the original author. But please don't just remove the entire thing except for links to non-notable websites, that's vandalism. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 06:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The orphan killer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The orphan killer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The orphan killer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potential conflict of interest[edit]

I'm writing to let you know that I'm a little worried that you might be someone related to the production of The Orphan Killer. Your edits have made me believe that you are extremely new to Wikipedia and wiki editing as a whole, so I wanted to let you know that this would be a conflict of interest if you were. There's nothing against COI editing, but it's generally something to be avoided if at all possible. Please read WP:COI. I think that you're just very new and very green, so you are probably not aware of this. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Aw, it's no problem. I figured that it was something like this. If you ever need any help with anything, give me a buzz on my talk page. BTW, I love horror movies, so this was actually pretty fun to work on. My current favs are anything by Stuart Gordon (man is a genius!) and Trick R Treat.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
They usually only last a week unless for some reason they need to extend it to get a better consensus one way or the other. I don't see this happening since everyone has agreed that the new layout is good, so they should close the discussion on this Saturday, the 24th.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Matt Farnsworth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 03:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matt Farnsworth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

url=http://www.monstersandcritics.com/movies/reviews/article_1151477.php/Movie_Review_Iowa|work=[[Monsters and Critics]|accessdate=11 October 2013|date=Mar 31, 2006}}</ref>''[[Slant Magazine]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matt Farnsworth for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Farnsworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Farnsworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Natg 19 (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]