User talk:Two.25.45.251
Two.25.45.251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have never edited in any way except productively and well. I am truly fed up of the absurd attacks on me which started when I got blocked with a false accusation of vandalism. I. Have. Never. Vandalised. Anything. OK? Two.25.45.251 (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are not blocked because of vandalism. You are blocked because you are believed to be Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. You have not addressed this in your unblock request, so there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Note that I strongly recommend WP:UTRS if you wish to address those concerns. Your case is substantially complicated and an unblock request is beyond the capability of most adminstrators to thoroughly investigate. Yamla (talk) 13:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Two.25.45.251 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not that person. There are no grounds to believe I am. I have only ever made good edits. Right now, I am merely trying to defend myself against lies, but it seems you want to be free to lie about me as you please. It's unbelievably tiresome and ridiculous to see good editing treated in this way. Note that: I was blocked for vandalism; blocked for complaining about being blocked; blocked for redoing good edits; unblocked after an utterly absurd faff; blocked again by wheel warring administrators on spurious grounds. All for making good edits. You say try UTRS. I did that; I was unblocked as a result; I was reblocked on spurious grounds by someone else. Again: all for making good edits. Two.25.45.251 (talk) 13:11, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's quite obvious that you either are the "Best known for" IP editor or edit in exactly the same style that got that editor community-banned, so similarly that it makes no difference. Thus you will not be unblocked. Huon (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- This is the usual time-wasting succession of denials, accusations and useless appeals we go through with every instance of the "Best known for" IP editor. I have revoked talk page access. Huon (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
AN/I notification[edit]
I made an AN/I section regarding you: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Two.25.45.251. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- I have restored all of the mainspace edits on this account as I think they were all good, aside from two that had already been reverted or otherwise fixed. I have put forward a suggestion for unblocking on the ANI thread and hopefully something will happen. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)